You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

200 lines
23 KiB

/* @generated */
digraph cfg {
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_1" [label="1: Start binary_conditional::binaryConditional\nFormals: \nLocals: x:binary_conditional::X 0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X 0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X a:binary_conditional::X \n " color=yellow style=filled]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_1" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_14" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_2" [label="2: Exit binary_conditional::binaryConditional \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_3" [label="3: Destruction(Scope) \n _=*&x:binary_conditional::X [line 23, column 1]\n n$1=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&x:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 23, column 1]\n _=*&a:binary_conditional::X [line 23, column 1]\n n$3=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&a:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 23, column 1]\n " shape="box"]
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_3" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_2" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_4" [label="4: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X); [line 22, column 9]\n n$8=_fun_binary_conditional::getX(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X*) assign_last [line 22, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_4" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_6" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_5" [label="5: + \n " ]
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_5" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_12" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_6" [label="6: Call _fun_binary_conditional::X::operator_bool \n _=*&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X [line 22, column 9]\n n$10=_fun_binary_conditional::X::operator_bool(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X&) [line 22, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_6" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_7" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_6" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_8" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_7" [label="7: Prune (true branch, boolean exp) \n PRUNE(n$10, true); [line 22, column 9]\n " shape="invhouse"]
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_7" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_9" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_8" [label="8: Prune (false branch, boolean exp) \n PRUNE(!n$10, false); [line 22, column 9]\n " shape="invhouse"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_8" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_10" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_9" [label="9: ConditionalStmt Branch \n n$11=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X*,&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X&) [line 22, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_9" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_5" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_10" [label="10: ConditionalStmt Branch \n n$12=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X*,&a:binary_conditional::X&) [line 22, column 19]\n " shape="box"]
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_10" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_5" ;
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_11" [label="11: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X); [line 22, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_11" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_4" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_12" [label="12: Destruction(temporaries cleanup) \n n$13=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&x:binary_conditional::X*,&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X&) [line 22, column 9]\n _=*&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X [line 22, column 19]\n n$17=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 22, column 19]\n _=*&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X [line 22, column 19]\n n$15=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 22, column 19]\n " shape="box"]
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_12" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_3" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_13" [label="13: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(x:binary_conditional::X); [line 22, column 3]\n " shape="box"]
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_13" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_11" ;
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_14" [label="14: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(a:binary_conditional::X); [line 21, column 3]\n n$18=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&a:binary_conditional::X*) [line 21, column 5]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_14" -> "binaryConditional#binary_conditional#15641211300815748363.a0f7e256e24b7117cb94c66e5aa27a30_13" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_1" [label="1: Start binary_conditional::conditional\nFormals: \nLocals: x:binary_conditional::X 0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X 0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$7:binary_conditional::X 0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X 0$?%__sil_tmp_temp_marker_n$8:_Bool a:binary_conditional::X \n " color=yellow style=filled]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_1" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_21" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_2" [label="2: Exit binary_conditional::conditional \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_3" [label="3: Destruction(Scope) \n _=*&x:binary_conditional::X [line 28, column 1]\n n$1=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&x:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 28, column 1]\n _=*&a:binary_conditional::X [line 28, column 1]\n n$3=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&a:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 28, column 1]\n " shape="box"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_3" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_2" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_4" [label="4: + \n " ]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_4" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_14" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_5" [label="5: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X); [line 27, column 9]\n n$10=_fun_binary_conditional::getX(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X*) assign_last [line 27, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_5" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_6" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_6" [label="6: Call _fun_binary_conditional::X::operator_bool \n _=*&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X [line 27, column 9]\n n$12=_fun_binary_conditional::X::operator_bool(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X&) [line 27, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_6" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_7" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_6" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_8" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_7" [label="7: Prune (true branch, boolean exp) \n PRUNE(n$12, true); [line 27, column 9]\n " shape="invhouse"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_7" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_9" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_8" [label="8: Prune (false branch, boolean exp) \n PRUNE(!n$12, false); [line 27, column 9]\n " shape="invhouse"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_8" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_11" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_9" [label="9: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$7:binary_conditional::X); [line 27, column 18]\n n$14=_fun_binary_conditional::getX(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$7:binary_conditional::X*) assign_last [line 27, column 18]\n *&0$?%__sil_tmp_temp_marker_n$8:_Bool=1 [line 27, column 18]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_9" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_10" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_10" [label="10: ConditionalStmt Branch \n n$15=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X*,&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$7:binary_conditional::X&) [line 27, column 18]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_10" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_4" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_11" [label="11: ConditionalStmt Branch \n n$16=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X*,&a:binary_conditional::X&) [line 27, column 27]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_11" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_4" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_12" [label="12: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X); [line 27, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_12" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_5" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_13" [label="13: ExprWithCleanups \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(0$?%__sil_tmp_temp_marker_n$8:_Bool); [line 27, column 9]\n *&0$?%__sil_tmp_temp_marker_n$8:_Bool=0 [line 27, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
[clang] fix bad interaction between ConditionalOperator and initializers Summary: This is several inter-connected changes together to keep the tests happy. The ConditionalOperator `b?t:e` is translated by first creating a placeholder variable to temporarily store the result of the evaluation in each branch, then the real thing we want to assign to reads that variable. But, there are situations where that changes the semantics of the expression, namely when the value created is a struct on the stack (eg, a C++ temporary). This is because in SIL we cannot assign the *address* of a program variable, only its contents, so by the time we're out of the conditional operator we cannot set the struct value correctly anymore: we can only set its content, which we did, but that results in a "shifted" struct value that is one dereference away from where it should be. So a batch of changes concern `conditionalOperator_trans`: - instead of systematically creating a temporary for the conditional, use the `trans_state.var_exp_typ` provided from above if available when translating `ConditionalOperator` - don't even set anything if that variable was already initialized by merely translating the branch expression, eg when it's a constructor - fix long-standing TODO to propagate these initialization facts accurately for ConditionalOperator (used by `init_expr_trans` to also figure out if it should insert a store to the variable being initialised or not) The rest of the changes adapt some relevant other constructs to deal with conditionalOperator properly now that it can set the current variable itself, instead of storing stuff inside a temp variable. This change was a problem because some constructs, eg a variable declaration, will insert nodes that set up the variable before calling its initialization, and now the initialization happens *before* that setup, in the translation of the inner conditional operator, which naturally creates nodes above the current one. - add a generic helper to force a sequential order between two translation results, forcing node creation if necessary - use that in `init_expr_trans` and `cxxNewExpr_trans` - adjust many places where `var_exp_typ` was incorrectly not reset when translating sub-expressions The sequentiality business creates more nodes when used, and the conditionalOperator business uses fewer temporary variables, so the frontend results change quite a bit. Note that biabduction tests were invaluable in debugging this. There could be other constructs to adjust similarly to cxxNewExpr that were not covered by the tests though. Added tests in pulse that exercises the previous bug. Reviewed By: da319 Differential Revision: D24796282 fbshipit-source-id: 0790c8d17
4 years ago
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_13" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_12" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_14" [label="14: ExprWithCleanups \n n$17=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&x:binary_conditional::X*,&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X&) [line 27, column 9]\n " shape="box"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_14" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_17" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_14" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_18" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_15" [label="15: + \n " ]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_15" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_19" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_16" [label="16: Destruction(temporaries cleanup) \n _=*&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$7:binary_conditional::X [line 27, column 27]\n n$23=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$7:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 27, column 27]\n " shape="box"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_16" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_15" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_17" [label="17: Prune (true branch, if) \n n$24=*&0$?%__sil_tmp_temp_marker_n$8:_Bool [line 27, column 27]\n PRUNE(n$24, true); [line 27, column 27]\n " shape="invhouse"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_17" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_16" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_18" [label="18: Prune (false branch, if) \n n$24=*&0$?%__sil_tmp_temp_marker_n$8:_Bool [line 27, column 27]\n PRUNE(!n$24, false); [line 27, column 27]\n " shape="invhouse"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_18" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_15" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_19" [label="19: Destruction(temporaries cleanup) \n _=*&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X [line 27, column 27]\n n$21=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$6:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 27, column 27]\n _=*&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X [line 27, column 27]\n n$19=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&0$?%__sil_tmpSIL_materialize_temp__n$5:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 27, column 27]\n " shape="box"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_19" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_3" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_20" [label="20: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(x:binary_conditional::X); [line 27, column 3]\n " shape="box"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_20" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_13" ;
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_21" [label="21: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(a:binary_conditional::X); [line 26, column 3]\n n$25=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&a:binary_conditional::X*) [line 26, column 5]\n " shape="box"]
"conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_21" -> "conditional#binary_conditional#4777209206611953450.41decaebdce6325bd31c1d47d4647c45_20" ;
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_1" [label="1: Start binary_conditional::getX\nFormals: __return_param:binary_conditional::X*\nLocals: x:binary_conditional::X \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_1" -> "getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_6" ;
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_2" [label="2: Exit binary_conditional::getX \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_3" [label="3: Return Stmt \n n$0=*&__return_param:binary_conditional::X* [line 16, column 3]\n " shape="box"]
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_3" -> "getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_4" ;
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_4" [label="4: Return Stmt \n n$1=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(n$0:binary_conditional::X*,&x:binary_conditional::X&) [line 16, column 10]\n " shape="box"]
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_4" -> "getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_5" ;
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_5" [label="5: Return Stmt \n _=*&x:binary_conditional::X [line 16, column 10]\n n$3=_fun_binary_conditional::X::~X(&x:binary_conditional::X*) injected [line 16, column 10]\n " shape="box"]
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_5" -> "getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_2" ;
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_6" [label="6: DeclStmt \n VARIABLE_DECLARED(x:binary_conditional::X); [line 15, column 3]\n n$5=_fun_binary_conditional::X::X(&x:binary_conditional::X*) [line 15, column 5]\n " shape="box"]
"getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_6" -> "getX#binary_conditional(class binary_conditional::X)#7708042186122353096.8825a5a3afa327848f6dcf77ec0e3f60_3" ;
"operator_bool#X#binary_conditional#(663222161121279878).1074e20ff76c2575638dad4d7c1539a7_1" [label="1: Start binary_conditional::X::operator_bool\nFormals: this:binary_conditional::X*\nLocals: \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"operator_bool#X#binary_conditional#(663222161121279878).1074e20ff76c2575638dad4d7c1539a7_1" -> "operator_bool#X#binary_conditional#(663222161121279878).1074e20ff76c2575638dad4d7c1539a7_3" ;
"operator_bool#X#binary_conditional#(663222161121279878).1074e20ff76c2575638dad4d7c1539a7_2" [label="2: Exit binary_conditional::X::operator_bool \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"operator_bool#X#binary_conditional#(663222161121279878).1074e20ff76c2575638dad4d7c1539a7_3" [label="3: Return Stmt \n *&return:_Bool=1 [line 11, column 21]\n " shape="box"]
"operator_bool#X#binary_conditional#(663222161121279878).1074e20ff76c2575638dad4d7c1539a7_3" -> "operator_bool#X#binary_conditional#(663222161121279878).1074e20ff76c2575638dad4d7c1539a7_2" ;
"X#X#binary_conditional#{14983956545993097243|constexpr}.13a5ec9d8c7205dc22870cc8a7cef45e_1" [label="1: Start binary_conditional::X::X\nFormals: this:binary_conditional::X* __param_0:binary_conditional::X&\nLocals: \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"X#X#binary_conditional#{14983956545993097243|constexpr}.13a5ec9d8c7205dc22870cc8a7cef45e_1" -> "X#X#binary_conditional#{14983956545993097243|constexpr}.13a5ec9d8c7205dc22870cc8a7cef45e_2" ;
"X#X#binary_conditional#{14983956545993097243|constexpr}.13a5ec9d8c7205dc22870cc8a7cef45e_2" [label="2: Exit binary_conditional::X::X \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"X#X#binary_conditional#{16256882625138630442|constexpr}.48629076530eab10af9149c015b04938_1" [label="1: Start binary_conditional::X::X\nFormals: this:binary_conditional::X*\nLocals: \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"X#X#binary_conditional#{16256882625138630442|constexpr}.48629076530eab10af9149c015b04938_1" -> "X#X#binary_conditional#{16256882625138630442|constexpr}.48629076530eab10af9149c015b04938_2" ;
"X#X#binary_conditional#{16256882625138630442|constexpr}.48629076530eab10af9149c015b04938_2" [label="2: Exit binary_conditional::X::X \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"X#X#binary_conditional#{9078254210141761193|constexpr}.75e8dfb872b829fb1a0edca3193e1301_1" [label="1: Start binary_conditional::X::X\nFormals: this:binary_conditional::X* __param_0:binary_conditional::X const &\nLocals: \n " color=yellow style=filled]
"X#X#binary_conditional#{9078254210141761193|constexpr}.75e8dfb872b829fb1a0edca3193e1301_1" -> "X#X#binary_conditional#{9078254210141761193|constexpr}.75e8dfb872b829fb1a0edca3193e1301_2" ;
"X#X#binary_conditional#{9078254210141761193|constexpr}.75e8dfb872b829fb1a0edca3193e1301_2" [label="2: Exit binary_conditional::X::X \n " color=yellow style=filled]
}