infer_clone/infer/tests/codetoanalyze/java/performance/issues.exp

codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_overrun_bad():void, 4, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L2, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Offset trace>,Assignment,<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: [2, 8] Size: 8]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 15 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 15 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 15 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.ArrayCost(int[]):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ mag.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.ArrayCost(int[]):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ mag.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 883, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 884, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 883, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 890, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add3_overrun_bad():void, 5, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset added: 4 Size: 3]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_addAll_bad():void, 10, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset added: 5 Size: 4]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_FP():void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_FP():void, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_ok():void, 19, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 202, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_ok():void, 19, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 201, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_empty_overrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset added: 1 Size: 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_empty_underrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset added: -1 Size: 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_get_overrun_bad():void, 3, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 2 Size: 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_get_underrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 0 Size: 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_bad():void, 5, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 1 Size: 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_in_loop_Good_FP():void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_in_loop_Good_FP():void, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_in_loop_Good_FP():void, 6, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Offset trace>,Assignment,<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: [0, +oo] Size: [0, +oo]]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_overrun_bad():void, 3, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 1 Size: 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_set_overrun_bad():void, 3, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 1 Size: 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_set_underrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 0 Size: 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 13 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 13 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_U5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Unknown value from: __cast,Assignment,Array access: Offset: [-oo, +oo] Size: [0, +oo]]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 13 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 13 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_with_inner(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 13 ⋅ (list1.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list1.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_with_inner(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 13 ⋅ (list1.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list1.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_local_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_local_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 12 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 12 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 12 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_with_iterator(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 9 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_with_iterator(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 9 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_constant(int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 7 ⋅ p.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_loop(int,int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 7 ⋅ p.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_loop(int,int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 7 ⋅ p.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 4 ⋅ maxI.ub + 3 ⋅ maxI.ub × (min(12, maxJ.ub)) + 5 ⋅ maxI.ub × (12-max(0, maxJ.lb)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI.ub)) × (min(11, maxJ.ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI.ub + 3 ⋅ maxI.ub × (min(12, maxJ.ub)) + 5 ⋅ maxI.ub × (12-max(0, maxJ.lb)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI.ub)) × (min(11, maxJ.ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI.ub + 3 ⋅ maxI.ub × (min(12, maxJ.ub)) + 5 ⋅ maxI.ub × (12-max(0, maxJ.lb)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI.ub)) × (min(11, maxJ.ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI.ub + 3 ⋅ maxI.ub × (min(12, maxJ.ub)) + 5 ⋅ maxI.ub × (12-max(0, maxJ.lb)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI.ub)) × (min(11, maxJ.ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection(CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection(CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection_quad_FP(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection_quad_FP(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_U5, no_bucket, ERROR, [Unknown value from: __cast,Assignment,Call,<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32 by call to `void CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection(CollectionTest$MyCollection)` ]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_some_java_collection(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 9 ⋅ (mSubscribers.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ mSubscribers.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_some_java_collection(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 9 ⋅ (mSubscribers.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ mSubscribers.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 5 ⋅ m.ub + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m.ub)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 5 ⋅ m.ub + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m.ub)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963050, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.FN_loop2(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 13 ⋅ k.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.FN_loop2(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 13 ⋅ k.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop0_bad():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1202, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop0_bad():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1203, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop1_bad():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop1_bad():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1304, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop3(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 238, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop3(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 237, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 205, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 265, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 229, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 271, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int):void, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 608, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int):void, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 609, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 201, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad_loop():int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1304, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 606, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 605, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 611, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 610, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2544, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2543, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2543, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 215, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Assignment,<RHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + [0, 29]):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 545, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 546, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/EvilCfg.java, EvilCfg.foo(int,int,boolean):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/FieldAccess.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess.iterate_upto_field_size(codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess$Test):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ test.a.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/FieldAccess.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess.iterate_upto_field_size(codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess$Test):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 6 ⋅ test.a.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 3 ⋅ (k.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k.ub)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 3 ⋅ (k.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k.ub)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 3 ⋅ (k.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k.ub)), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 2, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Parameter `size`,<RHS trace>,Parameter `x`,Binary operation: (size + [-oo, +oo]):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 6, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.list_size_invariant(java.util.List):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 5 ⋅ items.length.ub + 4 ⋅ (items.length.ub + 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.list_size_invariant(java.util.List):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ items.length.ub + 4 ⋅ (items.length.ub + 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 12 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) × (5+min(1, size.ub)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size.ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 12 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) × (5+min(1, size.ub)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size.ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 12 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) × (5+min(1, size.ub)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size.ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.x_is_invariant_ok(int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ (size.ub + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.x_is_invariant_ok(int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 6 ⋅ (size.ub + 20), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 11 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 250, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 251, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 250, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 29 ⋅ (length.ub - 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 29 ⋅ (length.ub - 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 29 ⋅ (length.ub - 1), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Parameter `a[*]`,<RHS trace>,Parameter `b[*]`,Binary operation: (a[*] × b[*]):signed64]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.nested_do_while_FP(int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.nested_do_while_FP(int):void, 8, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 14 + 33 ⋅ x.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 13 + 33 ⋅ x.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 14 + 33 ⋅ x.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 13 + 33 ⋅ x.length.ub, degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 13, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.vanilla_switch(int):void, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_linear(org.json.JSONArray):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ (int JSONArray.length().ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_linear(org.json.JSONArray):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ (int JSONArray.length().ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_quadratic(org.json.JSONArray):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 5 ⋅ (int JSONArray.length().ub)² + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, int JSONArray.length().ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_quadratic(org.json.JSONArray):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ (int JSONArray.length().ub)² + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, int JSONArray.length().ub)), degree = 2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.loop_over_charArray(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 11 + 13 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.loop_over_charArray(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 13 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_max_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_max_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 9, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_sum_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 16 + 6 ⋅ (int InputStream.read(byte[],int,int).ub + int Math.min(int,int).ub), degree = 1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_sum_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 17 + 6 ⋅ (int InputStream.read(byte[],int,int).ub + int Math.min(int,int).ub), degree = 1]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_overrun_bad():void, 4, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L2, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Offset trace>,Assignment,<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: [2, 8] Size: 8]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 15 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 15 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Array.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Array.array_access_weird_ok(long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 15 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.ArrayCost(int[]):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ mag.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.ArrayCost(int[]):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ mag.length.ub, degree = 1]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 883, degree = 0]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 884, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 883, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int):boolean, 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 890, degree = 0]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add3_overrun_bad():void, 5, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset added: 4 Size: 3]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_addAll_bad():void, 10, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset added: 5 Size: 4]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_FP():void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_FP():void, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_ok():void, 19, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 202, degree = 0]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_add_in_loop_ok():void, 19, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 201, degree = 0]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_empty_overrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset added: 1 Size: 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_empty_underrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset added: -1 Size: 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_get_overrun_bad():void, 3, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 2 Size: 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_get_underrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 0 Size: 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_bad():void, 5, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 1 Size: 1]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_in_loop_Good_FP():void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_in_loop_Good_FP():void, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_in_loop_Good_FP():void, 6, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Offset trace>,Assignment,<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: [0, +oo] Size: [0, +oo]]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_remove_overrun_bad():void, 3, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 1 Size: 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_set_overrun_bad():void, 3, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 1 Size: 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.arraylist_set_underrun_bad():void, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_L1, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Array declaration,Assignment,Array access: Offset: 0 Size: 0]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
-												[inferbo,cost] Add symbols for unknown function calls

Reviewed By: mbouaziz, skcho

Differential Revision: D13239712

fbshipit-source-id: 1bf24e394

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 13 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 13 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, BUFFER_OVERRUN_U5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<Length trace>,Unknown value from: __cast,Assignment,Array access: Offset: [-oo, +oo] Size: [0, +oo]]
-												[inferbo,cost] Add symbols for unknown function calls

Reviewed By: mbouaziz, skcho

Differential Revision: D13239712

fbshipit-source-id: 1bf24e394

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 13 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_shortcut_FP(java.util.ArrayList):boolean, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 13 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 2 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub × (-int Integer.intValue().lb + 11), degree = 2]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_with_inner(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 13 ⋅ (list1.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list1.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_arraylist_with_inner(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 13 ⋅ (list1.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list1.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_local_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_over_local_arraylist(java.util.ArrayList):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
-												[purity, hoisting] Add more purity models for fblite and instagram

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D13082201

fbshipit-source-id: e2b3f3e18

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 12 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 12 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_while_has_next(java.util.ArrayList):void, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 12 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_with_iterator(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 9 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayListTest.java, ArrayListTest.iterate_with_iterator(java.util.ArrayList):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 9 ⋅ (list.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_constant(int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 7 ⋅ p.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_loop(int,int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 7 ⋅ p.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_loop(int,int):int, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 7 ⋅ p.ub, degree = 1]
-												[inferbo] Prune more for "(x + e1) < e2" cases

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D13095472

fbshipit-source-id: 21aef560a

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 4 ⋅ maxI.ub + 3 ⋅ maxI.ub × (min(12, maxJ.ub)) + 5 ⋅ maxI.ub × (12-max(0, maxJ.lb)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI.ub)) × (min(11, maxJ.ub)), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI.ub + 3 ⋅ maxI.ub × (min(12, maxJ.ub)) + 5 ⋅ maxI.ub × (12-max(0, maxJ.lb)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI.ub)) × (min(11, maxJ.ub)), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI.ub + 3 ⋅ maxI.ub × (min(12, maxJ.ub)) + 5 ⋅ maxI.ub × (12-max(0, maxJ.lb)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI.ub)) × (min(11, maxJ.ub)), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Break.break_outer_loop_MaybeInfinite(int,int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 4 ⋅ maxI.ub + 3 ⋅ maxI.ub × (min(12, maxJ.ub)) + 5 ⋅ maxI.ub × (12-max(0, maxJ.lb)) + 5 ⋅ (min(11, maxI.ub)) × (min(11, maxJ.ub)), degree = 2]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection(CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection(CollectionTest$MyCollection):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ list.length.ub, degree = 1]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection_quad_FP(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection_quad_FP(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_U5, no_bucket, ERROR, [Unknown value from: __cast,Assignment,Call,<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32 by call to `void CollectionTest.iterate_over_mycollection(CollectionTest$MyCollection)` ]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_some_java_collection(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 9 ⋅ (mSubscribers.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ mSubscribers.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/CollectionTest.java, CollectionTest.iterate_over_some_java_collection(java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentLinkedQueue):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 9 ⋅ (mSubscribers.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ mSubscribers.length.ub, degree = 1]
-												[inferbo] Add traces to Conditions always true/false and Unreachable code

Reviewed By: ezgicicek

Differential Revision: D13082665

fbshipit-source-id: bb0e4cbf3

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 5 ⋅ m.ub + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m.ub)), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.compound_while(int):int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 5 ⋅ m.ub + 2 ⋅ (1+max(0, m.ub)), degree = 1]
-												[inferbo] Add traces to Conditions always true/false and Unreachable code

Reviewed By: ezgicicek

Differential Revision: D13082665

fbshipit-source-id: bb0e4cbf3

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int):int, 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
-												[inferbo] Add traces to Conditions always true/false and Unreachable code

Reviewed By: ezgicicek

Differential Revision: D13082665

fbshipit-source-id: bb0e4cbf3

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Compound_loop.while_and_or(int):void, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
-												[inferbo] Use WTO abstract interpreter

Reviewed By: jvillard

Differential Revision: D10072723

fbshipit-source-id: aabf3605e

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963050, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Continue.continue_outer_loop():int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7963049, degree = 0]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.FN_loop2(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 13 ⋅ k.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.FN_loop2(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 13 ⋅ k.ub, degree = 1]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop0_bad():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1202, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop0_bad():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1203, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop1_bad():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop1_bad():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1304, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop3(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 238, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.loop3(int):int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 237, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 205, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 265, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 229, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test.main_bad():int, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 271, degree = 0]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int):void, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 608, degree = 0]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int):void, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 609, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 201, degree = 0]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.if_bad_loop():int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1304, degree = 0]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int):int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 606, degree = 0]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 605, degree = 0]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int):int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 611, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 610, degree = 0]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int):int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
-												[inferbo] Use WTO abstract interpreter

Reviewed By: jvillard

Differential Revision: D10072723

fbshipit-source-id: aabf3605e

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2544, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2543, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.nested_loop():int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2543, degree = 0]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 215, degree = 0]
-												[RFC] Format all java files

Reviewed By: jeremydubreil

Differential Revision: D10067033

fbshipit-source-id: 73975664e

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214, degree = 0]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 4, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Assignment,<RHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + [0, 29]):signed32]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.real_while():int, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214, degree = 0]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 5, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([3, +oo] + 1):signed32]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 545, degree = 0]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Cost_test_deps.two_loops():int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 546, degree = 0]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/EvilCfg.java, EvilCfg.foo(int,int,boolean):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/FieldAccess.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess.iterate_upto_field_size(codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess$Test):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 6 ⋅ test.a.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/FieldAccess.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess.iterate_upto_field_size(codetoanalyze.java.performance.FieldAccess$Test):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 6 ⋅ test.a.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 3 ⋅ (k.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k.ub)), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 3 ⋅ (k.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k.ub)), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.do_while_invariant(int,int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 3 ⋅ (k.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ (max(1, k.ub)), degree = 1]
-												[Cost] Fix invariant variable analysis to be based on all reaching defns

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9337572

fbshipit-source-id: f7f5f7572

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 2, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Parameter `size`,<RHS trace>,Parameter `x`,Binary operation: (size + [-oo, +oo]):signed32]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.formal_not_invariant_FP(int,int):void, 6, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.list_size_invariant(java.util.List):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 5 ⋅ items.length.ub + 4 ⋅ (items.length.ub + 1), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.list_size_invariant(java.util.List):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ items.length.ub + 4 ⋅ (items.length.ub + 1), degree = 1]
-												[inferbo] Prune more for "(x + e1) < e2" cases

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D13095472

fbshipit-source-id: 21aef560a

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 12 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) × (5+min(1, size.ub)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size.ub)), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 12 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) × (5+min(1, size.ub)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size.ub)), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.local_not_invariant_FP(int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 12 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) + 7 ⋅ (size.ub + 5) × (5+min(1, size.ub)) + 4 ⋅ (5+min(0, size.ub)), degree = 2]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.x_is_invariant_ok(int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 9 + 6 ⋅ (size.ub + 20), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Invariant.java, Invariant.x_is_invariant_ok(int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 6 ⋅ (size.ub + 20), degree = 1]
-												[purity, hoisting] Add more purity models for fblite and instagram

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D13082201

fbshipit-source-id: e2b3f3e18

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/IteratorTest.java, IteratorTest.appendTo(java.util.Iterator):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1 + 12 ⋅ (parts.length.ub - 1) + 4 ⋅ parts.length.ub, degree = 1]
-												[inferbo,cost] Add symbols for unknown function calls

Reviewed By: mbouaziz, skcho

Differential Revision: D13239712

fbshipit-source-id: 1bf24e394

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 11 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, libraries.marauder.analytics.utils.json.JsonUtils.escape(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 74 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 250, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 251, degree = 0]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.do_while_independent_of_p(int):int, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 250, degree = 0]
-												[Inferbo/cost] Improve pretty-printing

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13045247

fbshipit-source-id: 5485b58c8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 29 ⋅ (length.ub - 1), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 29 ⋅ (length.ub - 1), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumb0(long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 29 ⋅ (length.ub - 1), degree = 1]
-												[cost] Pretty-printing exponents

Reviewed By: ezgicicek

Differential Revision: D13050241

fbshipit-source-id: dbac027b7

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 4 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 3, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Parameter `a[*]`,<RHS trace>,Parameter `b[*]`,Binary operation: (a[*] × b[*]):signed64]
-												[cost] Pretty-printing exponents

Reviewed By: ezgicicek

Differential Revision: D13050241

fbshipit-source-id: dbac027b7

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.dumbSort(long[],long[],int):void, 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 71 ⋅ (length.ub - 1)² + 8 ⋅ length.ub, degree = 2]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.nested_do_while_FP(int):void, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
-												[inferbo] Trace refactoring

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13116116

fbshipit-source-id: 0b885dcfb

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.nested_do_while_FP(int):void, 8, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
-												[inferbo] Pointer comparison

Reviewed By: skcho

Differential Revision: D13066771

fbshipit-source-id: 134b27db8

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 14 + 33 ⋅ x.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 13 + 33 ⋅ x.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 14 + 33 ⋅ x.length.ub, degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Loops.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops.similar(codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[],codetoanalyze.java.performance.Loops$C[]):boolean, 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 13 + 33 ⋅ x.length.ub, degree = 1]
-												[inferbo] Add traces to Conditions always true/false and Unreachable code

Reviewed By: ezgicicek

Differential Revision: D13082665

fbshipit-source-id: bb0e4cbf3

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
-												[infer] use a fully qualified name for the procedure field in the final report

Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D9237522

fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
-												Giving cost 1 to procedure with empty body

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D10378093

fbshipit-source-id: e6bff04da

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.test_switch():int, 13, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798, degree = 0]
-												[inferbo] Add traces to Conditions always true/false and Unreachable code

Reviewed By: ezgicicek

Differential Revision: D13082665

fbshipit-source-id: bb0e4cbf3

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, codetoanalyze.java.performance.Switch.vanilla_switch(int):void, 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, [Here]
-												[inferbo,cost] Add symbols for unknown function calls

Reviewed By: mbouaziz, skcho

Differential Revision: D13239712

fbshipit-source-id: 1bf24e394

											
										
										
											6 years ago
+								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_linear(org.json.JSONArray):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 7 + 5 ⋅ (int JSONArray.length().ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_linear(org.json.JSONArray):void, 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 ⋅ (int JSONArray.length().ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_quadratic(org.json.JSONArray):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 5 ⋅ (int JSONArray.length().ub)² + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, int JSONArray.length().ub)), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.jsonArray_quadratic(org.json.JSONArray):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 5 ⋅ (int JSONArray.length().ub)² + 4 ⋅ (1+max(0, int JSONArray.length().ub)), degree = 2]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.loop_over_charArray(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 11 + 13 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.loop_over_charArray(java.lang.StringBuilder,java.lang.String):void, 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 10 + 13 ⋅ (char[] String.toCharArray().length.ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_max_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_max_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 9, INTEGER_OVERFLOW_L5, no_bucket, ERROR, [<LHS trace>,Assignment,Binary operation: ([0, +oo] + 1):signed32]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_sum_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 16 + 6 ⋅ (int InputStream.read(byte[],int,int).ub + int Math.min(int,int).ub), degree = 1]
 								codetoanalyze/java/performance/UnknownCallsTest.java, UnknownCallsTest.read_sum_cost(java.io.InputStream,byte[],int,int,java.util.ArrayList):int, 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 17 + 6 ⋅ (int InputStream.read(byte[],int,int).ub + int Math.min(int,int).ub), degree = 1]