pghs975uc
/
infer_clone
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from 'ea734a3e77'
${ noResults }
infer_clone/infer/tests/codetoanalyze/java/performance/issues.exp

66 lines
9.9 KiB
Raw Normal View History Unescape

Get all the loop instructions Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D7776833 fbshipit-source-id: fb292a4
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, boolean ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int), 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 883]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, boolean ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int), 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 882]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, boolean ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int), 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 882]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, boolean ArrayCost.isPowOfTwo_FP(int), 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 889]
Inferbo: size of arrayblk is unsigned Reviewed By: skcho Differential Revision: D8370803 fbshipit-source-id: 1276b7e
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, void ArrayCost.ArrayCost(int[]), 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 5 * u$7^2]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/ArrayCost.java, void ArrayCost.ArrayCost(int[]), 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 6 + 5 * u$7^2]
Get all the loop instructions Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D7776833 fbshipit-source-id: fb292a4
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, int Break.break_constant(int), 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 8 + 7 * s$1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, int Break.break_loop(int,int), 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1 + 7 * s$1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, int Break.break_loop(int,int), 1, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 7 * s$1]
Fix control var analysis for loops with multiple back-edges per loop head Summary: I realized that control variable analysis was broken when we had multiple back-edges for the same loop. This is often the case when we have a switch statement combined with continue in a loop (see `test_switch` in `switch_continue.c`) or when we have disjunctive guards in do-while loops. This diff fixes that by - defining a loop by its loophead (the target of its backedges) rather than its back-edges. Then it converts back-edge list to a map from loop_head to sources of the loop's back-edges. - collecting multiple guard nodes that come from potentially multiple exit nodes per loop head In addition, it also removes the wrong assumption that an exit node belongs to a single loop head. Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D8398061 fbshipit-source-id: abaf288
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Break.java, void Break.break_outer_loop_FN(int,int), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
Get all the loop instructions Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D7776833 fbshipit-source-id: fb292a4
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, int Compound_loop.compound_while(int), 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, int Compound_loop.compound_while(int), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 7 * s$1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, int Compound_loop.compound_while(int), 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 5 + 7 * s$1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, int Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int), 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, int Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int), 3, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, int Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int), 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, int Compound_loop.nested_while_and_or(int), 4, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, void Compound_loop.while_and_or(int), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Compound_loop.java, void Compound_loop.while_and_or(int), 2, CONDITION_ALWAYS_TRUE, no_bucket, WARNING, []
Fix control var analysis for loops with multiple back-edges per loop head Summary: I realized that control variable analysis was broken when we had multiple back-edges for the same loop. This is often the case when we have a switch statement combined with continue in a loop (see `test_switch` in `switch_continue.c`) or when we have disjunctive guards in do-while loops. This diff fixes that by - defining a loop by its loophead (the target of its backedges) rather than its back-edges. Then it converts back-edge list to a map from loop_head to sources of the loop's back-edges. - collecting multiple guard nodes that come from potentially multiple exit nodes per loop head In addition, it also removes the wrong assumption that an exit node belongs to a single loop head. Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D8398061 fbshipit-source-id: abaf288
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Continue.java, int Continue.continue_outer_loop_FN(), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
Get all the loop instructions Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D7776833 fbshipit-source-id: fb292a4
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.FN_loop2(int), 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 12 * s$1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.FN_loop2(int), 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1 + 12 * s$1]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.FN_loop3(int), 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 2 + 12 * (-s$0 + s$1 + 15)]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.FN_loop3(int), 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 3 + 12 * (-s$0 + s$1 + 15)]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.loop0_bad(), 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1101]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.loop0_bad(), 2, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1102]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.loop1_bad(), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1203]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.loop1_bad(), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1202]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.main_bad(), 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 237]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.main_bad(), 8, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 205]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test.java, int Cost_test.main_bad(), 9, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 243]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.if_bad_loop(), 12, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 201]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1302]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1303]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.loop_despite_inferbo(int), 5, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 1302]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 604]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep1(int), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 605]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 608]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.loop_no_dep2(int), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 609]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.nested_loop(), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.real_while(), 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 213]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.real_while(), 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 214]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.real_while(), 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 213]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.two_loops(), 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 544]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, int Cost_test_deps.two_loops(), 7, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 545]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, void Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int), 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 608]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Cost_test_deps.java, void Cost_test_deps.if_bad(int), 6, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 607]
Cost solver Reviewed By: ddino Differential Revision: D8348319 fbshipit-source-id: 9274da6
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/EvilCfg.java, void EvilCfg.foo(int,int,boolean), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
Get rid of data dep analysis and localize it to single step Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D8330899 fbshipit-source-id: 84fb46c
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonArray.java, void JsonArray.addStringEntry(String), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, void JsonMap.addEntry(String,JsonType), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, void JsonMap.addEntry(String,Object), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, void JsonMap.addEntry(String,String), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, void JsonMap.addEntry(String,boolean), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, void JsonMap.addEntry(String,double), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, void JsonMap.addEntry(String,long), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonMap.java, void JsonMap.addKeyToMap(String), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonString.java, JsonString.<init>(String), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, StringBuilder JsonUtils.serialize(String), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, void JsonUtils.escape(StringBuilder,String), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
[tests] record error bucket in expected output Summary: It's useful to test that the bucket a given error is classified as doesn't change over time without notice. This records the bucket for *all* the tests, even though some never produce a bucket. This is to be on the safe size instead of risking to forget adding the bucket information when the test changes, or when copy/pasting from a test that doesn't have buckets to one that does. The implementation is pretty crude: it greps the beginning of the qualifier string for a `[bucket]`. Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D8236393 fbshipit-source-id: b3b1eb9
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, void JsonUtils.escape(StringBuilder,String), 1, BUFFER_OVERRUN_U5, no_bucket, ERROR, [Unknown value from: char[] String.toCharArray(),Assignment,ArrayAccess: Offset: [-oo, +oo] Size: [0, +oo]]
Get rid of data dep analysis and localize it to single step Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D8330899 fbshipit-source-id: 84fb46c
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/JsonUtils.java, void JsonUtils.serialize(StringBuilder,String), 0, INFINITE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, []
Fix control var analysis for loops with multiple back-edges per loop head Summary: I realized that control variable analysis was broken when we had multiple back-edges for the same loop. This is often the case when we have a switch statement combined with continue in a loop (see `test_switch` in `switch_continue.c`) or when we have disjunctive guards in do-while loops. This diff fixes that by - defining a loop by its loophead (the target of its backedges) rather than its back-edges. Then it converts back-edge list to a map from loop_head to sources of the loop's back-edges. - collecting multiple guard nodes that come from potentially multiple exit nodes per loop head In addition, it also removes the wrong assumption that an exit node belongs to a single loop head. Reviewed By: mbouaziz Differential Revision: D8398061 fbshipit-source-id: abaf288
7 years ago
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, int Switch.test_switch(), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 797]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, int Switch.test_switch(), 3, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 798]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, int Switch.test_switch(), 4, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 797]
codetoanalyze/java/performance/Switch.java, int Switch.test_switch(), 13, EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME_CALL, no_bucket, ERROR, [with estimated cost 797]