[sledge] Hoist conditional exps above boolean exps

Summary:
The backend does not generally interpret conditional expressions
specially. Therefore it is logically stronger to hoist them over other
boolean exps, for example normalizing

`e = (c ? t : f)` to `(c ? e = t : e =f)`

This enables the treatment of top-level conditional expressions in
terms of disjunction, conjunction and negation.

Reviewed By: mbouaziz

Differential Revision: D14495815

fbshipit-source-id: 4f2e8053f
master
Josh Berdine 6 years ago committed by Facebook Github Bot
parent 7595b05f39
commit a0a8c6320d

@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ let simp_cond cnd thn els =
| _ ->
App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= cnd}; arg= thn}; arg= els}
let simp_and x y =
let rec simp_and x y =
match (x, y) with
(* i && j *)
| Integer {data= i; typ}, Integer {data= j} ->
@ -921,11 +921,15 @@ let simp_and x y =
|_, (Integer {data; typ= Integer {bits= 1}} as f)
when Z.is_false data ->
f
(* e && (c ? t : f) ==> (c ? e && t : e && f) *)
| e, App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= c}; arg= t}; arg= f}
|App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= c}; arg= t}; arg= f}, e ->
simp_cond c (simp_and e t) (simp_and e f)
(* e && e ==> e *)
| _ when equal x y -> x
| _ -> App {op= App {op= And; arg= x}; arg= y}
let simp_or x y =
let rec simp_or x y =
match (x, y) with
(* i || j *)
| Integer {data= i; typ}, Integer {data= j} ->
@ -941,6 +945,10 @@ let simp_or x y =
|e, Integer {data; typ= Integer {bits= 1}}
when Z.is_false data ->
e
(* e || (c ? t : f) ==> (c ? e || t : e || f) *)
| e, App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= c}; arg= t}; arg= f}
|App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= c}; arg= t}; arg= f}, e ->
simp_cond c (simp_or e t) (simp_or e f)
(* e || e ==> e *)
| _ when equal x y -> x
| _ -> App {op= App {op= Or; arg= x}; arg= y}
@ -1001,15 +1009,25 @@ and simp_eq x y =
simp_not Typ.bool b
else (* b = true ==> b *)
b
(* e = (c ? t : f) ==> (c ? e = t : e = f) *)
| e, App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= c}; arg= t}; arg= f}
|App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= c}; arg= t}; arg= f}, e ->
simp_cond c (simp_eq e t) (simp_eq e f)
(* e = e ==> true *)
| x, y when equal x y -> bool true
| x, y -> App {op= App {op= Eq; arg= x}; arg= y}
and simp_dq x y =
match simp_eq x y with
| App {op= App {op= Eq; arg= x}; arg= y} ->
App {op= App {op= Dq; arg= x}; arg= y}
| b -> simp_not Typ.bool b
match (x, y) with
(* e ≠ (c ? t : f) ==> (c ? e ≠ t : e ≠ f) *)
| e, App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= c}; arg= t}; arg= f}
|App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional; arg= c}; arg= t}; arg= f}, e ->
simp_cond c (simp_dq e t) (simp_dq e f)
| _ -> (
match simp_eq x y with
| App {op= App {op= Eq; arg= x}; arg= y} ->
App {op= App {op= Dq; arg= x}; arg= y}
| b -> simp_not Typ.bool b )
let simp_xor x y =
match (x, y) with
@ -1114,16 +1132,20 @@ let app1 ?(partial = false) op arg =
(* every App subexp of output appears in input *)
match op with
| App {op= Eq | Dq} -> ()
| _ ->
iter e ~f:(function
| App {op= Eq | Dq} -> ()
| App _ as a ->
assert (
is_subexp ~sub:a ~sup:op || is_subexp ~sub:a ~sup:arg
|| Trace.fail
"simplifying %a %a@ yields %a@ with new subexp %a"
pp op pp arg pp e pp a )
| _ -> () ) )
| _ -> (
match e with
| App {op= App {op= App {op= Conditional}}} -> ()
| _ ->
iter e ~f:(function
| App {op= Eq | Dq} -> ()
| App _ as a ->
assert (
is_subexp ~sub:a ~sup:op || is_subexp ~sub:a ~sup:arg
|| Trace.fail
"simplifying %a %a@ yields %a@ with new subexp \
%a"
pp op pp arg pp e pp a )
| _ -> () ) ) )
let app2 op x y = app1 (app1 ~partial:true op x) y
let app3 op x y z = app1 (app1 ~partial:true (app1 ~partial:true op x) y) z

Loading…
Cancel
Save