Summary:
A plus is a plus, no need to give up when +/- is about pointers. This
gets rid of some false positives involving pointer arithmetic.
However, the problem remains if we make things a bit more
inter-procedural. This is documented in an added test.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D18932877
fbshipit-source-id: 4ad1cfe72
Summary:
The `Typ.FIeldname` module has many issues. Among those:
- It has 5 different string/printing functions and most of them do radically different things in Java and in Clang.
- There is no type safety: creating a Clang field and calling a Java function on it will lead to a crash (`rindex_exn` etc, there are usually no dots in Clang fields).
- It uses a single string for Java fields, containing the package, the class and the field, e.g., `java.lang.Object.field`. This is wasteful, because
- there is no sharing of strings for packages/classes, and,
- string operations need to be performed every time we need the field or the class or the package alone.
This diff preserves the behaviour of the module's interface, so the API problems remain.
However, by using a saner representation for Java fields we can get small performance and large memory gains (the type environment in Java is much smaller, about 30-40%).
In addition, many functions on clang fields would previously do string manipulations (look for `.` and split on it) before returning the final field unchanged -- now they use the type of the field for that.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D18908864
fbshipit-source-id: a72d847cc
Summary:
- Do most of the work of `solve_arithmetic_constraints` inside `subst_attribute` instead, since we need to re-use the latter function for post-conditions where the first function is not appropriate.
- When substituting arithmetic constraints, we refine arithmetic information (both concrete intervals and inferbo), which can lead to inconsistent states. Instead of recording the new arithmetic facts by returning a new current state, just act as a map on attributes. This is to enable doing the point above.
- All this lead to a somewhat messy refactoring...
- Rename `CannotApplyPre` to `Contradiction` since it's used for post-conditions as well now
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18889120
fbshipit-source-id: d81647143
Summary:
Pointers are hard... The previous test had no chance of doing
initialisation of the pointer by reference and was in fact a false
negative (and still is, fix incoming). Renamed functions to stress the
false negative and added a test that is really (potentially) doing
pointer initialisation by reference.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18888008
fbshipit-source-id: 1e72408c7
Summary:
Finally use information from the inferbo intervals in pulse's domain to
make decisions about whether conditionals are feasible or not.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18811193
fbshipit-source-id: d80a28657
Summary: This diff extends the bound domain to express multiplication of bounds in some simple cases.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D18745246
fbshipit-source-id: 4f2dcb42c
Summary:
This gets rid of false positives when something invalid (eg null) is
passed by reference to an initialisation function. Havoc'ing what the
contents of the pointer to results in being optimistic about said
contents in the future.
Also surprisingly gets rid of some FNs (which means it can also
introduce FPs) in the `std::atomic` tests because a path condition
becomes feasible with havoc'ing.
There's a slight refinement possible where we don't havoc pointers to
const but that's more involved and left as future work.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18726203
fbshipit-source-id: 264b5daeb
Summary:
It's a well-known fact that pulse should know too. To avoid splitting
the abstract state systematically, only act if we know the pointer is
exactly 0 to avoid reporting a nullptr dereference on `free(x)`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D18708575
fbshipit-source-id: 1cc3f6908
Summary:
Turns out code uses atomics in important places, modelling it removes
FPs.
The tests are copied from biabduction and adapted and extended a bit. I
didn't implement compare_exchange primitives for now (plus, giving them
a sequential semantics like in biabduction is probably a bit cheeky).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18708576
fbshipit-source-id: a3581b8a4
Summary:
This diff adds inferbo's interval values to pulse's attributes. The added values will be used to
filter out infeasible passes in the following diffs.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D18726667
fbshipit-source-id: c1125ac6e
Summary:
A plugin update allows infer to know when a function doesn't return
according to its attributes. This propagates this info all the way to
the attributes of each function, and then use this information in a new
pre-analysis that cuts the links to successor nodes of each `Call`
instruction to a function that does not return.
NOTE: The "no_return" `CallFlag.t` was dead code, following diffs deal
with that (by removing it).
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D18573922
fbshipit-source-id: 85ec64eca
Summary:
This also prints the CFGs *after* pre-analysis for individual procedures
in infer-out/captured/<filename>/<proc>.dot. One can also look up the
CFGs before pre-analysis in infer-out/captured/proc_cfgs_frontend.dot.
Context: I want to add a pre-analysis that needs to look at proc
attributes inter-procedurally. For this to make sense it has to happen
*after* all of capture, and before analysis.
Thus, this diff brings back the lazy running of the pre-analysis like in
D15803492, except that we still make sure to run the pre-analyses
systematically regardless of the checkers being run by running the
pre-analysis from ondemand.ml. Also we don't need to re-introduce the
"did_preanalysis" proc attribute for the same reason that the
pre-analysis is now run once and for all by ondemand.ml (instead of each
individual checker back in the days).
This has the benefit of running the pre-analysis only when needed, and
the drawback that several concurrent processes analysing the same proc
descs will duplicate work. Since pre-analyses are supposed to be very
fast I assume that neither is a big deal. If they become more expensive
then the benefit gets bigger and the drawback is just the same as with
regular analyses.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18573920
fbshipit-source-id: de350eaef
Summary:
- more flexible API
- less error-prone thanks to named parameters
- also takes care of adjusting predecessors of the previous successors!
This fixes some (probably harmless) bugs in the frontends.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D18573923
fbshipit-source-id: ad97b3607
Summary:
Note: Disabled by default.
Having some support for values, we can report when a null or constant
value is being dereferenced. The particularity here is that we don't
report when 0 is a possible value for the address, or even if we know
that the value of the address can only be 0 in that branch! Instead, we
allow ourselves to report only when we the address has been *set* to
NULL (or any constant).
This is in line with how pulse deals with other issues: only report when
1. we see an address become invalid, and
2. we see the same address be used later on
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17665468
fbshipit-source-id: f1ccf94cf
Summary:
This adds a more interesting value domain to pulse: concrete intervals.
There are still two main limitations:
1. arithmetic operations are all over-approximated: any assignment involving arithmetic operations is replaced by non-determinism
2. abstract values that are discovered to be equal are not merged into one
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18058972
fbshipit-source-id: 0492a590f
Summary:
This does several things because it was hard to split it more:
1. Split most of the arithmetic reasoning to PulseArithmetic.ml. This
doesn't need to be reviewed thoroughly because an upcoming diff
changes the domain from just `EqualTo of Const.t` to an interval domain!
2. When going through a prune node intra-procedurally, abduce arithmetic
facts to the pre (instead of just propagating them). This is the "assume
as assert" trick used by biabduction 1.0 too and allows to propagate
arithmetic constraints to callers.
3. Use 2 when applying summaries by pruning specs whose preconditions
have un-satisfiable arithmetic constraints.
This changes one of the tests! Pulse now does a bit more work to find
the false positive, as can be seen in the longer trace.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18117160
fbshipit-source-id: af3b2c8c0
Summary:
Previously, we considered a function which modifies its parameters to be impure even though it might not be modifying the underlying value. This resulted in FPs like the following program in Java:
```
void fresh_pure(int[] a) {
a = new int[1];
}
```
Similarly, in C++, we considered the following program as impure because it was writing to `s`:
```
Simple* reassign_pure(Simple* s) {
s = new Simple{2};
return s;
}
```
This diff fixes that issue by starting the check for address equivalnce in pre-post not directly from the addresses of the stack variables, but from the addresses pointed to by these stack variables. That means, we only consider things to be impure if the actual values pointed by the parameters change.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18113846
fbshipit-source-id: 3d7c712f3
Summary: In preparation for improvements to the arithmetic reasoning.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D17977207
fbshipit-source-id: ee98e0772
Summary:
bigmacro_bender
There are 3 ways pulse tracks history. This is at least one too many. So
far, we have:
1. "histories": a humble list of "events" like "assigned here", "returned from call", ...
2. "interproc actions": a structured nesting of calls with a final "action", eg "f calls g calls h which does blah"
3. "traces", which combine one history with one interproc action
This diff gets rid of interproc actions and makes histories include
"nested" callee histories too. This allows pulse to track and display
how a value got assigned across function calls.
Traces are now more powerful and interleave histories and interproc
actions. This allows pulse to track how a value is fed into an action,
for instance performed in callee, which itself creates some more
(potentially now interprocedural) history before going to the next step
of the action (either another call or the action itself).
This gives much better traces, and some examples are added to showcase
this.
There are a lot of changes when applying summaries to keep track of
histories more accurately than was done before, but also a few
simplifications that give additional evidence that this is the right
concept.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17908942
fbshipit-source-id: 3b62eaf78
Summary:
- add the variable being declared so we can report it back in the trace in addition to its location
- distinguish between local vars and formals
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17930348
fbshipit-source-id: a5b863e64
Summary:
Instead of a string argument named `~str` pass `Formal | Global` and let
`add_to_errlog` figure out how to print it.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17907657
fbshipit-source-id: ed09aab72
Summary:
When we make the decision to go into a branch "v = N" where some
abstract value is compared to a constant, remember the corresponding
equality. This allows to prune simple infeasible paths
intra-procedurally.
Further work is needed to make this useful interprocedurally, for
instance either or both of these ideas could be explored:
- abduce v=N in the precondition and do not apply summaries when the
equalities in the pre are not satisfied
- prune post-conditions that lead to unsat states where a value has to
be equal to several different constants
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17906166
fbshipit-source-id: 5cc84abc2
Summary:
When we know "x = 3" and we have a condition "x != 3" we know we can
prune the corresponding path.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17665472
fbshipit-source-id: 988958ea6
Summary: If we have no pulse summary (most likely caused by pulse finding a legit issue with the code), let's consider the function as impure.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17906016
fbshipit-source-id: 671d3e0ba
Summary:
Previously deduplication was always on which is not great for testing.
Also split tests so that we can still test deduplication separately.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17686877
fbshipit-source-id: 280d91473
Summary:
Unfortunately it is very hard to predict when
`Typ.Procname.describe` will add `()` after the function name, so we
cannot make sure it is always there.
Right now we report clowny stuff like "error while calling `foo()()`",
which this change fixes.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17665470
fbshipit-source-id: ef290d9c0
Summary:
Introduce a new experimental checker (`--impurity`) that detects
impurity information, tracking which parameters and global variables
of a function are modified. The checker relies on Pulse to detect how
the state changes: it traverses the pre and post pairs starting from
the parameter/global variable and finds where the pre and post heaps
diverge. At diversion points, we expect to see WrittenTo/Invalid attributes
containing a trace of how the address was modified. We use these to
construct the trace of impurity.
This checker is a complement to the purity checker that exists mainly
for Java (and used for cost and loop-hoisting analyses). The aim of
this new experimental checker is to rely on Pulse's precise
memory treatment and come up with a more precise im(purity)
analysis. To distinguish the two checkers, we introduce a new issue
type `IMPURE_FUNCTION` that reports when a function is impure, rather
than when it is pure (as in the purity checker).
TODO:
- improve the analysis to rely on impurity information of external
library calls. Currently, all library calls are assumed to be nops,
hence pure.
- de-entangle Pulse reporting from analysis.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17051567
fbshipit-source-id: 5e10afb4f
Summary: Use_after_free was used both for biabduction and pulse, and the biabduction version is blacklisted by default. As a result, the Pulse version was also disabled unintentionally. This changes the name of the old use_after_free so that now we can get use_after_free bugs whenever pulse is enabled.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17182687
fbshipit-source-id: 539ca69de
Summary: With this predicate we are able to check for static global variables in AL.
Reviewed By: ddino
Differential Revision: D17164848
fbshipit-source-id: a3d10598c
Summary:
This diff uses the models of vector for modelling string in Cpp.
Depends on D16963153
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16963166
fbshipit-source-id: 5effe2d72
Summary:
This is more powerful than `"symbols"` for more advanced use-cases. Keep
`"symbols"` unchanged to make migrating easier.
Differential Revision: D16985756
fbshipit-source-id: dfbb09393
Summary: Adding new predicate for checking whether a variable is defined as extern. May be useful in AL rules.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D16961690
fbshipit-source-id: 0677077dc
Summary:
Use whatever information we can to decide whether to use C or Java
syntax when outputting an access expression, now that we store them as
such.
Also, make cluster callbacks explicitly set the language, as this was not done before and led to some confusion (Clang being set when analysing a Java file).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16884160
fbshipit-source-id: 40adf9f35
Summary:
Change the logic of the annotation reachability checker in the following
ways:
1. Sanitizers take priority over sinks, i.e. a procedure that is both a
sink and a sanitizer is not a sink. This changes the existing tests
that seemed to assume the opposite. However I think that way is more
useful and goes better with the fact that sanitizers are specified as
"overrides".
2. When applying a summary, check again that we are not in a sanitizer
for the corresponding sink.
Without (2) this there was a subtle bug when several rules were
specified. For example, if `sink_wrapper()` wraps `sink()` for a rule
`R` then the summary of `sink_wrapper()` will be: `R-sink : call to sink()`.
Then, suppose `sanitizer()` calls `sink_wrapper()` and `sanitizer()` is
a sanitizer for `R` but not for another rule `R'`. The previous code
would add the call to `sink()` to the summary of `sanitizer()` because
it's not a sanitizer for `R'`, even though `sink()` is not a sink for
`R'`!
The current code will re-apply the rules correctly so that sinks are
matched only against the right sanitizers.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16895577
fbshipit-source-id: 266cc4940
Summary:
- run the tests! they weren't hooked up to the main Makefile :/
- add some html debug messages
- formatting
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16895578
fbshipit-source-id: e96d737cc
Summary:
It adds a vector model of `data` method.
Depends on D16687280
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16689400
fbshipit-source-id: 156016b3c
Summary:
It adds a model of vector::push_back
Depends on D16687225
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16687269
fbshipit-source-id: 9d2a73fca
Summary:
It enables pruning of vector's size when the return value of the function call of `vector::size` is pruned.
Depends on D16687167
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16687225
fbshipit-source-id: 793a21b3a
Summary:
It generates vector value ondemand when it is given as a parameter.
Depends on D16645589
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16645624
fbshipit-source-id: 7498c8ab2
Summary:
These have proved to be too fragile to maintain as they would often break
compilation of user code. They have been off by default for more than a year
now (D7350715).
Removing the include models shows a more accurate picture of what infer results
look like in production. As such, lots of tests have changed, mostly
biabduction but also in inferbo. SIOF was using include-based models too but
now libc++ is better and iostreams are implemented in a way that SIOF
understands (instead of being magical creatures) so nothing changed there.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16602171
fbshipit-source-id: ce38f045b
Summary:
This diff prevents that the latest prune value is overwritten as top
from callees.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D16540391
fbshipit-source-id: bdd5b42ed
Summary:
This diff improves the precision of the mod operator.
For example, result of x % c (when x>=0 and c>0) is
(before) [0, c-1]
(after) [0, min(c-1,x)]
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16518578
fbshipit-source-id: a68660ee7
Jules Villard
Nikos Gorogiannis
Martin Trojer
Sungkeun Cho
Ezgi Çiçek
Dulma Churchill