Summary:
The problem: current enumerator semantics does not work on symbolic enumerator that is given as a
parameter.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D24017059
fbshipit-source-id: 378e75bb0
Summary:
This diff substitutes closure parameter when it is given via variable. For example,
```
x = ^{ ... }
foo(x)
```
this diff substitutes the closure variable `x`,
```
x = ^{ ... }
foo(^{ ... })
```
so that the specialization of `foo` can be done by `CCallSpecializaedWithClosures.process`.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23814595
fbshipit-source-id: a89f1530f
Summary:
This diff reports paths under the xcode isysroot as relative in tests.
This was a problem when another machine that has a different isysroot
directory is running the test.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D23729222
fbshipit-source-id: 4e9681f65
Summary:
As title.
Facebook
Found this case by examining db.
>
D23394545
Time complexity of `_registerTabPreloadables` has **decreased** from `Top` to `O(1)`. Please make sure this is an expected change. You can inspect the trace to understand the complexity increase:
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D23448099
fbshipit-source-id: 108fd1ef2
Summary:
This diff adds translation of `dictionaryWithObjects:forKeys:count:`. In the previous implementation it was
translated as if it was `dictionaryWtihObjectsAndKeys:`, but their function parameters are different.
In this diff, it translates an array literal `NSDictionary* a = @ [ @"firstName": @"Foo", @"lastName":@"Bar" ];` to
```
n$1=NSString.stringWithUTF8:(@"firstName")
n$2=NSNumber.stringWithUTF8:(@"Foo")
n$3=NSNumber.stringWithUTF8:(@"lastName")
n$4=NSNumber.stringWithUTF8:(@"Bar")
temp1[0]:objc_object*=n$1
temp1[1]:objc_object*=n$3
temp2[0]:objc_object*=n$2
temp2[1]:objc_object*=n$4
n$3=NSDictionary.dictionaryWithObjects:forKeys:count:(temp2:objc_object* const [2*8], temp1:objc_object*const [2*8], 2:int)
```
where `temp` is an additional local variable declared as array.
See,
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsdictionary/1574184-dictionarywithobjects?language=objchttps://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsdictionary/1574181-dictionarywithobjectsandkeys
{F316854542}
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23447042
fbshipit-source-id: 14b7c3f2b
Summary:
This diff finishes the migration from the specialization of methods that take blocks as arguments. Here we delete all the old code and change the way we model dispatch functions so that the tests pass.
- Remove the code for specializing the methods in biabduction.
- Remove the call flags `cf_with_block_parameters` that was only used in this algorithm.
- Removes models for dispatch functions.
- Adds models for dispatch functions as program transformation only in biabduction. To be added in other checkers in the future.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D23345342
fbshipit-source-id: b5e8542ce
Summary:
Two issues are fixed
1. For this diff, when the condition `curr_langauge_is Java` is removed in some part of the analysis, some c bufferoverrun tests are broken. This is fixed in this diff by inspecting if we are dealing with a `Size` alias referring to an `objc_internal_collection_array`.
2. Previously, when we are modifying mutable array in a loop, e.g. adding element to the array or removing element from the array, we are unable to give an estimable size of the array after exiting the loop. This is now fixed, and the corresponding FPs are resolved.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23342350
fbshipit-source-id: 200f5261c
Summary:
In the previous diffs, we implement enumerator in order to estimate the cost of for-each loop in ObjC, but when we have FP case when enumerator is used not in for-each loop. For example, the following code has top cost before the fix.
```
void nsarray_enumerator_linear_FP(NSArray* array) {
id obj;
NSInteger sum = 0;
NSEnumerator* enumerator = [array objectEnumerator];
while (obj = [enumerator nextObject]) {
sum += (NSInteger)obj;
}
}
```
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23294895
fbshipit-source-id: 50c7b359f
Summary:
Fix the FP when iterating through constant collection.
facebook
This fix is a hack for now.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D23241338
fbshipit-source-id: e2e0c05f8
Summary:
As title.
This diff is co-authored by SungKeun Cho and me.
facebook
This diff is co-authored by skcho and me.
Original comments from skcho
"For the record:
1. Rory and I tried to write models for ObjC iterator.
2. We could not use Java's iterator semantics: In Java's, `hasNext` returns the size of collection, rather than a boolean, and which is used as a control variable. On the other hand, in ObjC, it calls only `nextObject`, not calling `hasNext`, and the return value of which is being checked as `null`.
3. We added an artificial field `objc_iterator_offset` to keep the index of the iterator, and the models added in this diff are handling that integer value.
A problem is that `array.objc_iterator_offset` is not included in the control variables, since the condition of the loop is `nextObject() != null` that does not include the iterator offset. We need to make `array.objc_iterator_offset` as a control variable, by changing the part collecting control variables.
"
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D22944278
fbshipit-source-id: 7e71b79c1
Summary:
When implementing iterator, we find out that because some semantics of inferbo is Java-specific, we cannot simply use Java's `Collection` model for `NSCollection`.
So this diff writing `NSCollection` model separately.
This diff also extracts the common parts of `NSCollection` and `Collection` into `AbstractCollection` to combine the duplicate the parts.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22975159
fbshipit-source-id: daed3f99f
Summary: Before, `NSCollection` are modelled like array, but this will have issue when we want to say add object to array. This diff changes `NSCollection`'s model to use Java's Collection model.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22840079
fbshipit-source-id: b944b743b
Summary: Implement `alloc` and implement initialisation method that uses the return value of `alloc`, i.e. `NSString.init`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22840080
fbshipit-source-id: 47a7523e3
Summary:
This diff translates for-in block in objc as a simple for-loop. For example,
`for (item_type item in items) { body }` is translated to
```
NSEnumerator *enumerator = [items objectEnumerator];
item_type item;
while (item = [enumerator nextObject]) { body }
```
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22841524
fbshipit-source-id: 296ee84df
Summary:
We check for supertypes in Java. Why not ObjC?
Would be good to get dulmarod's input here.
Reviewed By: roro47
Differential Revision: D22817126
fbshipit-source-id: 52c1c3f3c
Summary:
This diff adds translation of `arrayWithObjects:count:`. In the previous implementation it was
translated as if it was `arrayWithObjects:`, but their function parameters are different.
In this diff, it translates an array literal `NSArray* a = @ [ 2, 3 ];` to
```
n$1=NSNumber.numberWithInt:(2:int)
n$2=NSNumber.numberWithInt:(3:int)
temp[0]:objc_object*=n$1
temp[1]:objc_object*=n$2
n$3=NSArray.arrayWithObjects:count:(temp:objc_object* const [2*8],2:int)
a:NSArray*=n$3
```
where `temp` is an additional local variable declared as array.
See,
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray/1460145-arraywithobjectshttps://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray/1460096-arraywithobjects?language=objc
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22631305
fbshipit-source-id: 5be0a55d4
Summary:
This will allow all the analyses to be able to call closures without any special treatment: we transform the call to variables that point to closures into normal function calls. We treat only ObjC blocks at the moment, with C++ lambdas to be done as a next step.
We aimed to achieve certain results in Pulse (see tests: avoid memory leaks and NPEs FPs) while also keeping the biabduction analysis working as before.
We also checked that for the examples analyzed Pulse behaves like the correct semantics of ObjC programs with blocks.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22547333
fbshipit-source-id: efe56ed51
Summary: Add cost model for most common `NSString` functions in cost analysis
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22433005
fbshipit-source-id: 2f57bbda9
Summary: If a node is unreachable and the cost of the node is Top, we were giving Top cost :( Let's fix it.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22548269
fbshipit-source-id: d79743669
Summary:
As title
Model `NSString` as `JavaString`.
Since `NSArray` does not contain information about its type of element, we do not use associate string with collection as in Java and C++. In Java, String model is implemented using java collection, and for C++, string model is implemented using vector.
So instead, we use existing `JavaString` model.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22431949
fbshipit-source-id: 7cdde1ad7
Summary: This diff prevents printing line numbers of loop in the trace description, which helps to keep the same descriptions even when the line number of a function is changed in tests.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22375584
fbshipit-source-id: 676d1a7cc
Summary: Create test for the most common unmodeled function in inferbo that acts as control variable.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22331168
fbshipit-source-id: 1913682db
Summary: Add objc test for customized class and blocks. Mostly sanity test.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22043918
fbshipit-source-id: 917deeea7
Summary:
Move the implementation of implicit getters and setters from the biabduction to the clang frontend so these methods are accessible to all the checkers.
*Background*: In Objective-C when properties are created in the interface of a class, the compiler creates automatically the instance variable for it and also the getter and setter in the implementation of the class. In the frontend we collect the information about which method is the implicit getter and setter of which instance variable (we get the method declaration but not the implementation), and here we add the implicit implementation.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22187238
fbshipit-source-id: 76e0508ed
Summary:
Add objc test for ```NSArray``` and ```NSMutableArray```.
```NSMutableArray``` is a subclass of ```NSArray```.
For documentation of ```NSArray```, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray?language=objc
For documentation of ```NSMutableArray```, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsmutablearray?language=objc
The underlying mechanism for ```NSMutableArray``` is quite complicated. It changes the underlying data structure during runtime, so it is possible to have say O(log n) complexity for accessing element in array. (See here https://opensource.apple.com/source/CF/CF-855.11/CFArray.h) However, this is unlikely to happen if the engineer does not abuse the usage of the class ```NSMutableArray``` according to at least two ios engineers. So here the complexity is set to match the normal expectation of the complexity.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22041277
fbshipit-source-id: c27f43167
Summary:
Add objc test case for ```NSInteger``` and ```NSString```.
The test cases are adapted from java test case: ```IntTest.java```, ```StringBuilder.java```, and ```StringTest.java```.
Inspection of the record will be done later.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21994620
fbshipit-source-id: 0c1d7b34e
Summary: We do not use an arbitrary threshold to test cost results anymore but instead rely on `cost-issues` which do not have any trace attached. This diff adds traces to `costs-report.json` so that we can test cost issues with traces.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21858846
fbshipit-source-id: e73321a92
Summary:
Now that we have a way to write cost issues, let's not rely on some arbitrary threshold (and also get rid of `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME` issues in tests).
One consequence of this is that we will loose the cost traces in tests since `costs-report.json` doesn't have any traces. Next diff fixes that.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21837574
fbshipit-source-id: 86b4d028d
Summary:
In order to test cost analysis results, currently we rely on having an arbitrary cost threshold (200) and report issues that exceed this cost. For instance, a cost of 201 is considered expensive and reported as `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME` issue in cost tests.
This means, if we change the cost analysis in a slight way that results in some constant cost increase under 200, we wouldn't able to detect it. I find this unsatisfactory and somewhat hacky.
This diff adds the ability to write the result of `costs-report.json` into a separate `cost-issues.exp` and then compare the actual costs (not only than relying on this arbitrary threshold reporting mechanism).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21816312
fbshipit-source-id: 93b531928
Summary:
The directory names had some interesting variety due to historical
reasons.
- {c,cpp,objc,objcpp}/errors/ date from the time when infer was only
biabduction
- java/infer/ dates from the time when we had an "--analyzer" option and
"infer" was one of them (sic), and eg another was "eradicate".
- c/biabduction/ dates from the time when the biabduction analysis was
being migrated to the "checkers" (AI) framework. For some reasons the
tests there are not a subset of c/infer/ but seem to be entirely new
tests.
The convention now dictates that we should name all of these
*/biabduction/. This diff moves the existing tests from c/biabduction/
into c/biabduction/misc/.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D21300147
fbshipit-source-id: 516d1cb15
Summary: We don't use allocation costs in prod at the moment. There is no plan to do so in the near future. Let's not report them anymore and also save some space in `costs-report.json`.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D19766828
fbshipit-source-id: 06dffa61d
Summary: We want to keep big O notation as simple as possible in cost analysis reports (especially in diff time). Therefore, let's not show constants/min/max in big O notations even though the resulting asymptotic bound might be inaccurate. Developers can click on the trace and see the actual cost.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16731351
fbshipit-source-id: 2e16f7eca
Summary: In order to test changes to bigO notation, let's record them in test results.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16763972
fbshipit-source-id: c1376909b
Sungkeun Cho
Qianyi Shu
Ezgi Çiçek
Dulma Churchill
Jules Villard