Summary:
This is step further simplify the code to avoid cases where the summary of the procedure being analyzed can exist in two different versions:
# one version is the summary passed as parameter to every checker
# the other is a copy of the summary in the in-memory specs table
This diff implements:
# the analysis always run through the `Ondemand` module (was already the case before)
# the summary of the procedure being analyzed is created at the beginning of the on-demand analysis call
# all the checkers run in sequence, update their respective part of the payload and log errors to the error table
# the summary is store at the end of the on-demand analysis call
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4787414
fbshipit-source-id: 2d115c9
Summary:
Changes every checker to take a summary as parameter and return the updated summary to the next checker. Since several operations, like `Reporting.log_*` are modifying the summary in memory by loading them from the in-memory cache of summaries, we currently need to rely on `Specs.get_summary_unsafe` to return the updated version of the summary.
This diff allows to change the API of `Reporting` to take a summary as input and progressively remove all the calls `Specs.get_summary_unsafe` independently from adding the possibility to run several checkers at the same time. The final objective to have every checker just passing around the summary of the procedure being analyzed, and having the in-memory cache only use to store the summaries of the callees.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4649252
fbshipit-source-id: 98f7ca7
Summary:
There was a bug where we allowed ourselves to project local variables from the callee summary into an access path in the caller.
We should only be able to project callee variables that are in the footprint.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4684868
fbshipit-source-id: 53a2b9d
Summary: In some cases where a function is called directly on a formal (e.g, `def foo(o) { callSomething(o) }`, we were failing to propagate the footprint trace to the caller.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4502404
fbshipit-source-id: d4d632f
Summary:
At one point I thought we'd want to have lots of different schedulers for things like exploring loops in different orders, but that hasn't materialized.
Let's make the common use-case simpler by hiding the `Scheduler` parameter inside the `AbstractInterpreter` module.
We can always expose `MakeWithScheduler` later if we want to.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D4508095
fbshipit-source-id: 726e051
Summary:
When the receiver type and return type of an unknown call are the same, propagate taint to both the receiver and the return type.
This does the right thing for common "builder-style" methods that both update and return the receiver.
We already had custom models for a few such methods (e.g., `StringBuilder.append`), but we can remove them now.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4490071
fbshipit-source-id: 325ea88
Summary:
If we have code like
```
o.setF(source())
sink(o)
```
and `setF` is an unknown method, we probably want to report.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil, mburman
Differential Revision: D4438896
fbshipit-source-id: 5edd204
Summary: This will be useful in upcoming changes to the thread-safety analysis as well.
Reviewed By: dkgi
Differential Revision: D4402146
fbshipit-source-id: c750127
Summary: Generalized the CppTrace into a Clang trace because we don't currently have separate checkers for Obj-C and Cpp. Happy to separate them later if there is a good reason
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D4394952
fbshipit-source-id: e288761
Summary:
A domain should not definite its initial state, since distinct users of the domain may want to choose different initial values.
For example, one user might want to bind all of the formals to some special values, and one user might want the initial domain to be an empty map
This diff makes this distinction clear in the types by (a) requiring the initial state to be passed to the abstract interpreter and (b) lifting the requirement that abstract domains define `initial`.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D4359629
fbshipit-source-id: cbcee28
Summary: This more easily allow to switch between the different modes for handeling dynamic dispatch
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4367556
fbshipit-source-id: 795d2c4
Summary:
There's a lot of boilerplate work to be done when adding a new kind of source.
This diff tries to reduce the boilerplate by making a functor do all the work.
The functor:
(1) adds a notion of "footprint kind" to the source
(2) packages the source with a call site
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D4349224
fbshipit-source-id: 5e1701a
Summary:
We currently can only model the return values of functions as sources.
In order to model inputs of endpoints as sources, we need the capability to treat the formals of certain functions as sources too.
This diff adds that capability by adding a function for getting the tainted sources to the source module, then using that info in the analysis.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4314738
fbshipit-source-id: dd7d423
Summary: Different analyses need different preanalyses to run. It doesn't make sense for all of the pre-analyses to be bundled together into one package.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D4348243
fbshipit-source-id: 46a8ebd
Summary:
Previously, summaries worked by flattening the access tree representing the post of the procedure into (in essence) a list of functions from caller input traces to callee output traces.
This is inefficient in many ways, and is also much more complex than just using the original access tree as the summary.
One big inefficiency of the old way is this: calling `Trace.append` is slow, and we want to do it as few times as possible.
Under the old summary system, we would do it at most once for each "function" in the summary list.
Now, we'll do it at most once for each node in the access tree summary.
This will be a smaller number of calls, since each node can summarize many input/output relationships.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4271579
fbshipit-source-id: 34e407a
Summary:
Before, the Interprocedural functor was a bit inflexible. You couldn't do custom postprocessing like normalizing the post state or coverting the post from an astate type to a summary type.
Now, you can do whatever you want by passing a custom `~compute_post` function.
Since `AbstractInterpreter.compute_post` can be used by clients who don't care to do anything custom, this doesn't create too much boilerplate.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D4309877
fbshipit-source-id: 8d1d85d
Sam Blackshear
Jeremy Dubreil
Andrzej Kotulski
Martino Luca
Cristiano Calcagno