Summary:
This was a crutch from the days before ownership analysis.
We shouldn't need it anymore, and it was actually causing FP's because we were skipping analysis of `ImmutableList.builder()` and not understanding that the return value is owned.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6035631
fbshipit-source-id: afa0ade
Summary:
Before we understood ownership, we needed this to avoid a mountain of Builder-related FP's.
Now that we have fairly sophisticated understanding of ownership, we can kill this hack.
Reviewed By: jaegs
Differential Revision: D4940238
fbshipit-source-id: 8d86e57
Summary: Just cleanup; gives us slightly less test code to maintain.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4429265
fbshipit-source-id: d43c308
Summary:
If these collections don't encapsulate their state properly, there are bigger problems than thread safety issues :).
Plus, these warnings are less-than-actionable for non-Guava maintainers.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4324277
fbshipit-source-id: cacfbf0
Summary:
Although the Builder pattern is not actually thread-safe, Builder's are not expected to be shared between threads.
Handle this by ignoring all unprotected accesses in classes the end with "Builder".
We might be able to soften this heuristic in the future by ensuring rather than assuming that Builder are not shared between methods (or, ideally, between threads).
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4280761
fbshipit-source-id: a4e6738
Sam Blackshear