Summary:
For more deduplications of issues, this diff loosens the condition of
similar bounds. The previous condition of similar bounds was too
strict, so [0,0] and [0,+oo] were not similar.
Depends on D10851762
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10866127
fbshipit-source-id: 4ba912a88
Summary:
This diff preserves values of offset and index separately, rather than
one value of their addition, because premature addition results in
imprecise FPs by the limited expressiveness of the domain.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10851393
fbshipit-source-id: 1685ead36
Summary: Reports will now be issued for the class loads of the methods specified by the option `--class-loads-roots`.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D10466492
fbshipit-source-id: 91456d723
Summary:
It avoids checking integer overflow when it definitely cannot happen.
For example, it does not check integer overflow of addition when one
of parameters is a negative number, or underflow of subtraction when
its first parameter is a positive number.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10446161
fbshipit-source-id: b8c86e1b2
Summary: This diff changes pp of binary operation condition in order to avoid a `make test` failure. For the same `uint64_t` type, it is translated to `unsigned long long` in 64bit mac, but `unsigned long` in 64bit linux, which made a `make test` failure.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10459466
fbshipit-source-id: 449ab548e
Summary:
Use same code for deciding whether two accesses conflict across java/clang, by adapting that of the clang version.
Eliminate/simplify some code.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, jberdine
Differential Revision: D10217383
fbshipit-source-id: dc0986d05
Summary:
Make distinct reports on strict mode violations.
For now, restrict to direct violations (UI threads calls transitively a violating method).
Will assess impact and enable indirect reports later (via locks).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10126780
fbshipit-source-id: 9c75930bc
Summary: Before this diff, the analysis would only lookup the attributes with the classname appearing in the instruction. However, it would fail to find those attributes for inherited and not overridden methods. With this diff, the attributes are now searched recursively in the super classes.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10007469
fbshipit-source-id: 77d721cba
Summary: This fixes some cases of false positives where the analysis will compare with the wrong overridden methods. This could later be improved with the possibility to do sub-typing comparison on the parameters.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D9985249
fbshipit-source-id: 7998d8619
Summary:
Keep `--analyzer` around for now for integrations that depend on it.
Also deprecate the `--infer-blacklist-path-regex`,
`--checkers-blacklist-path-regex`, etc. in favour of
`--report-blacklist-path-regex` which more accurately represents what these do
as of now.
Rely on the current subcommand instead of the analyzer where needed, as most of
the code already does.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9942809
fbshipit-source-id: 9380e6036
Summary:
Goal of the stack: deprecate the `--analyzer` option in favour of turning
individual features on and off. This option is a mess: some of the options are
now subcommands (compile, capture), others are aliases (infer and checkers),
and they can all be replicated using some straightforward combination of other
options.
This diff: stop using `--analyzer` in tests. It's mostly `checkers` everywhere,
which is already the default. `linters` becomes `--no-capture --linters-only`.
`infer` is supposed to be `checkers` already. `crashcontext` is
`--crashcontext-only`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9942689
fbshipit-source-id: 048281761
Summary: It is common on Android code to recycle the `View` object by nullifying them in the `onDestroy()` or `onDestroyView()` methods. In this case, the outer `Fragment` object structure is preserve while the inner `View` object are set to null for the garbage collect to release the memory. However, if the fields are only set to `null` in the `onDestroy*()` methods, those fields cannot be `null` during the active lifecycle of the `Fragment`, so it is not necessary to annotate those fields with `Nullable`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10024458
fbshipit-source-id: b05e538d9
Summary:
The method matcher is now used sufficiently it warrants refactoring out into its own module.
Also, kill dev-android-strict-mode and leave starvation-strict-mode as the stronger option.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9990753
fbshipit-source-id: 626a70a19
Summary: Always read the attributes from the attributes DB instead of trying to read the attributes from the analysis summaries
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9845085
fbshipit-source-id: aef48e6bf
Summary: No longer report inconsistencies with the annotations with subtyping when the super class is in an external packages since those warnings are not necessarily accurate or actionable.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D9845098
fbshipit-source-id: 1f2bcd739
Summary: Sometimes it's very confusing to see why infer believes a method is running on the UI thread. Make a trace out of all the relevant info.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9781212
fbshipit-source-id: 6d018e400
Summary:
Turn off by default until mature enough.
Also rename the dev-strict-mode test dir to highlight the dev part.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9775571
fbshipit-source-id: c3a41bbdf
Summary:
First step in writing an analyzer that is meant to run only on Android core library implementation.
This will, when finished, compute the library entrypoints that may lead to a strict mode violation.
The normal analyzer will use those to statically flag strict mode violations in app code.
Strict Mode is an Android debug mode, where doing certain things (like disk read/write or network activity) on the UI thread will raise an exception. We want to statically catch these, as well as indirect versions (the UI thread takes a lock and another thread holding that lock calls a method that would be a strict mode violation).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9634407
fbshipit-source-id: c30bcedb3
Summary:
Separate and rename error reporting functions that use the biabduction state.
No checkers should call these functions.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D9633579
fbshipit-source-id: 884fcee66
Summary: The `procedure` field in the final report should use the non-ambiguous fully qualified name containing the Java package declaration and the list of parameter types.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9237522
fbshipit-source-id: e9b0ff664
Summary: Treat calls to Thread.sleep as blocking, even when the timeouts are less than the ANR limit.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D9027950
fbshipit-source-id: 001409896
Summary:
Guava subclasses Future in ways that make .get() calls safe from the UI thread.
Treat such methods as skip.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9013475
fbshipit-source-id: 38373aa5f
Summary:
This previous FP does not occur anymore, make sure it doesn't regress.
https://github.com/facebook/infer/issues/49
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D8442842
fbshipit-source-id: b3fde1ad1
Summary:
Litho uses an idiom as follows. `Component.Builder` has an abstract method `T getThis()` which is supposed to be implemented as `{return this;}`.
I believe the reason it's there is to have covariant return types in subclasses, though this doesn't really matter.
We don't do dynamic dispatch, so instead of summarising `getThis` as having a return ownership of `OwnedIf({ 0 })` we just return `Unowned`.
This is generating many false positives, which are really hard to debug.
Here I'm special-casing any abstract method whose return type is equal to that of it's only argument, to return conditional ownership.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D8947992
fbshipit-source-id: 33c7e952d
Summary:
Currently, some blocking calls are turning up too many false positives. Adjust severities by fix rate/preexisting numbers.
Also, restrict some calls to exact class, as opposed to superclasses.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8850599
fbshipit-source-id: 47543d04a
Summary:
- Do not add actuals of a call as unstable.
- Replace access trie with simple set of paths, which is easier to debug/argue correct.
- Fix bug where a prefix path was searched, as opposed to a *proper* prefix.
- Restrict interface to the minimum so that alternative implementations are easier.
Reviewed By: ilyasergey
Differential Revision: D8573792
fbshipit-source-id: 4c4e174
Summary: C/C++ code can, in some cases, generate a large number of temporary (Sil) variables. Since we are already not reporting races on these, not recording them gives some perf back.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, jvillard
Differential Revision: D8566999
fbshipit-source-id: 148ac46
Summary: Trying to convert a large int literal to an OCaml int raises an exception. The use case here actually needed a float anyway, so add an API for that.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8550410
fbshipit-source-id: 382495b
Summary:
I realized that control variable analysis was broken when we had multiple back-edges for the same loop. This is often the case when we have a switch statement combined with continue in a loop (see `test_switch` in `switch_continue.c`) or when we have disjunctive guards in do-while loops.
This diff fixes that by
- defining a loop by its loophead (the target of its backedges) rather than its back-edges. Then it converts back-edge list to a map from loop_head to sources of the loop's back-edges.
- collecting multiple guard nodes that come from potentially multiple exit nodes per loop head
In addition, it also removes the wrong assumption that an exit node belongs to a single loop head.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8398061
fbshipit-source-id: abaf288
Summary:
We need to report on non-private methods (the opposite even leads to FPs sometimes on deadlocks). To do this, the domain needs to change so that the interpretation of an order pair `a,b` is no longer "lock `a` is taken in the *current method* and held until lock `b` is taken". Instead the meaning is now "lock `a` is taken in some method *of the same class with the current method* and is held until `b` is taken".
These changes are quite drastic because the previous implementation optimised extensively around the previous use case.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8395351
fbshipit-source-id: a2bd22b
Ezgi Çiçek
Mehdi Bouaziz
Sungkeun Cho
Nikos Gorogiannis
Dino Distefano
Jeremy Dubreil
Jules Villard
Martino Luca
Julian Sutherland