Summary: We already suppress race reports if the field is marked in this way; makes sense to do the same thing for these reports.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D7589275
fbshipit-source-id: 8f0aeab
Summary:
Report nullable inconsistencies by relying on the bytecode, and not on the presence of analysis summary on disk.
This use the `--external-java-packages` to avoid reporting inconsistencies outside of the codebase.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D7481101
fbshipit-source-id: 281135d
Summary: This was causing false positives when returning the constant integer 0.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D7330143
fbshipit-source-id: 45d19dd
Summary:
At the moment, Java and Clang sources/sinks live in the same inferconfig entry.
If we try to parse a Java procedure that happens to be an invalid Clang qualified name (e.g., `MyClass.<init>`),
parsing will crash.
As a temporary fix, throw an exception and catch it instead.
In the future, we can avoid this by requiring that JSON source/sink specifications to indicate the language.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7291880
fbshipit-source-id: f8f4502
Summary: Add a new command-line option `--external-java-packages` which allows the user to specify a list of Java package prefixes for external packages. Then the analysis will not report non-actionable warnings on those packages (e.g., inconsistent `Nullable` annotations in external packages).
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D7126960
fbshipit-source-id: c4f3c7c
Summary:
See comment--`Prop(resType = blah) myProp` will generate `.myProp`, `.myPropRes`, and `.myPropAttr`, and any of them can be used to set the prop.
Because our annotation parameter parsing is a bit primitive, handle this by simply checking the `Res` and `Attr` suffixes for every `Prop`.
This shouldn't lead to false negatives because these methods will only exist if the `resType` annotation is specified anyway.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6955362
fbshipit-source-id: ec59b21
Summary:
The boolean lock domain is simple and surprisingly effective.
But it's starting to cause false positives in the case where locks are nested.
Releasing the inner lock also releases the outer lock.
This diff introduces a new locks domain: a map of locks (access paths) to a bounded count representing an underapproximation of the number of times the lock has been acquired.
For now, we just use a single dummy access path to represent all locks (and thus a count actually would have been sufficiently expressive; we don't need the map yet).
But I'm planning to remove this limitation in a follow-up by refactoring the lock models to give us an access path.
Knowing the names of locks could be useful for error messages and suggesting fixes.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D6182006
fbshipit-source-id: 6624971
Summary:
Previously, we could understand than an access was safe either because it was possibly owned or protected by a thread/lock, but not both. If an access was both protected by a lock and rooted in a paramer (i.e., possibly owned), we would forget the ownership part of the precondition and remember only the lock bit. This leads to false positives in cases where an access protected by a lock is owned, but another unowned access to the same memory is not protected by a lock (see the new `unownedLockedWriteOk` E2E test for an example).
This diff makes access safety conditions disjunctive so we can simultaneously track whether an access is owned and whether an access is protected by a thread/lock. This will fix false positives like the one explained in T24015160.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D6671489
fbshipit-source-id: d17715f
Summary:
We already knew not to warn when non-resource `Closeable`'s like `ByteArrayOutputStream` weren't closed, but we still warned on their subtypes.
This diff fixes that problem by checking subclasses in the frontend.
This also removes the need for Java source code models of non-resource types, so I removed them.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6843413
fbshipit-source-id: 60fe7fb
Summary: This should allow to report several occurences of the an issue appearing several times within the same method.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D6783298
fbshipit-source-id: 5555906
Summary:
This lets us fix the limitation of reporting false positives when a `private` function calls `build()` on a parameter without passing all of the required props.
We will now report such issues in the caller only if it fails to pass the required props.
An unfortunate consequence of this change is that we lose track of where the actual call to `build` occurs--we now report on the declaration of the caller function rather than on the call site of `build`.
I'll work on addressing that in a follow-up.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6764153
fbshipit-source-id: 3b173e5
Summary: At each call to `Component$Builder.build()`, checks that the required props for `Component` have been set via prior calls to the `Builder`. Does not yet handle `Prop(optional = true)`, but will address that in a follow-up.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6735524
fbshipit-source-id: 0c812fd
Summary:
In Java, static variables are distinguished by package/class:
the file where they are defined doesn't matter.
Fixes#831.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/833
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6661240
Pulled By: sblackshear
fbshipit-source-id: beeb2f9
Summary: There was a back and forth conversion between `string` and `IssueType.t` which was not necessary.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6562747
fbshipit-source-id: 70b57a2
Summary: This will avoid collisions when the inner classes are implementing the same methods. For example, the previous version of the bug hash could conflate the issues when several annonymous inner classes are implementing the same method, e.g. a annonymous subclass of `Runnable` implementing `run()`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6461594
fbshipit-source-id: 2bb8545
Summary:
Simpler bug hash that is more independent of the underlying analysis. This now computes the hash based on:
- the bug type.
- the base filename: i.e for my/source/File.java, just keep File.java. So the hash will not change when moving files around.
- the simple method name: i.e. without package information and list of parameters. So changing the list of parameters will not affect the bug hash.
- the error message were the line numbers have been removed. So moving code or reformatting will not affect the hash.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D6445639
fbshipit-source-id: 82e3cbe
Summary: The clang compiler introduces a materialized temporary expression which should be treated similarly to the Infer internal temporary variables.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6331237
fbshipit-source-id: 81d8196
Summary: This only works for Java at the moment but we can re-organise the code later to add the Objective C equivalent of these assertion methods.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D6230588
fbshipit-source-id: 46ee98e
Summary: The Java bytecode does not contain information about the location of abstract of interface methods. Before this diff, the analysis trace was tuncated and the file where the abstract or interface method was not included in the trace, which makes it harder to understand the Infer report, especially when the method is on a generated file that is not checked in the repository.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6223612
fbshipit-source-id: c80c6f2
Summary: More general version of the fix in D6138749. This diff moves RacerD's lock modeling into a separate module and uses the module in the HIL translation to check when a function has lock/unlock semantics.
Reviewed By: jberdine, da319
Differential Revision: D6191886
fbshipit-source-id: 6e1fdc3
Summary:
In a summary, you never want to see a trace where non-footprint sources flow to a sink.
Such a trace is useless because nothing the caller does can make more data flow into that sink.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5779983
fbshipit-source-id: d06778a
Summary:
If you write
```
boolean readUnderLockOk() {
synchronized (mLock) {
return mField;
}
}
```
it will be turned into
```
lock()
irvar0 = mField
unlock()
return irvar0
```
in the bytecode. Since HIL eliminates reads/writes to temporaries, it will make the above code appear to perform a read of `mField` outside of the lock.
This diff fixes the problem by forcing HIL to perform all pending reads/writes before you exit a critical section.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D6138749
fbshipit-source-id: e8ad9a0
Summary: This check is deprecated and will be replaced by a dedicated checker to detect unitialized values.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D6133108
fbshipit-source-id: 1c0e9ac
Summary: In preparation for making `-a checkers` the default (when no analyzer is specified), let's test `-a checkers` by default.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D6051177
fbshipit-source-id: d8ef611
Summary:
Refactor `RegisterCheckers` to give a record type to checkers instead of a tuple type.
Print active checkers with their per-language information.
Improve the manual entries slightly.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6051167
fbshipit-source-id: 90bcb61
Summary:
Whenever we see a use of a lock, infer that the current method can run in a multithreaded context. But only report when there's a write under a lock that can be read or written without synchronization elsewhere.
For now, we only infer this based on the direct usage of a lock; we don't assume a caller runs in a multithreaded context just because its (transitive) callee can.
We can work on that trickier case later, and we can work on smarter inference that takes reads under sync into account. But for now, warning on unprotected writes of reads that occur under sync appears to be too noisy.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5918801
fbshipit-source-id: 2450cf2
Summary:
This was a crutch from the days before ownership analysis.
We shouldn't need it anymore, and it was actually causing FP's because we were skipping analysis of `ImmutableList.builder()` and not understanding that the return value is owned.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6035631
fbshipit-source-id: afa0ade
Summary:
This generates `--resource-leak-only` automatically, and make the other
checkers' `-only` option work as expected with respect to `--resource-leak` too
(eg, `--resource-leak --biabduction-only` disables resource leak).
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6051134
fbshipit-source-id: 2d4a2ba
Summary:
1. Mark some Makefile targets as depending on `MAKEFILE_LIST` so they get rebuilt on Makefile changes
2. Do not show boolean options with no documentation in the man pages (like we do for other option types).
3. Default to Lazy dynamic dispatch for the checkers.
4. In the tests, use `--<checker>-only` instead of relying on `--no-default-checkers`
5. `--no-filtering` is redundant if `--debug-exceptions` is passed
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6030578
fbshipit-source-id: 3320f0a
Summary: We will then be able to merge the tests for the other checkers without affecting these lab tests
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D6039433
fbshipit-source-id: e575ce9
Summary:
Another step toward running the biabduction analysis as a checker.
Depends on D6038210
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D6038682
fbshipit-source-id: fed45bf
Summary: Now that we report write-write races involving more than one write, we need to improve the traces accordingly.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D6026845
fbshipit-source-id: b1366dd
Summary:
Previously, annotating something ThreadSafe meant "check that it is safe to run all of this procedure's methods in parallel with each other" (including self-parallelization).
This makes sense, but it means that if the user writes no annotations, we do no checking.
I'm moving toward a model of inferring when an access might happen on a thread that can run concurrently with other threads, then automatically checking that it is thread-safe w.r.t to all other accesses to the same memory (on or off the current thread thread).
This will let us report even when there are no `ThreadSafe` annotations.
Any method that is known to run on a new thread (e.g., `Runnable.run`) will be modeled as running on a thread that can run in parallel with other threads, and so will any method that is `synchronized` or acquires a lock.
In this setup, adding `ThreadSafe` to a method just means: "assume that the current method can run in parallel with any thread, including another thread that includes a different invocation of the same method (a self race) unless you see evidence to the contrary" (e.g., calling `assertMainThread` or annotating with `UiThread`).
The key step in this diff is changing the threads domain to abstract *what threads the current thread may run in parallel with* rather than *what the current thread* is. This makes things much simpler.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5895242
fbshipit-source-id: 2e23d1e
Summary:
Indicate if read or write is protected, and do not print only the
field but also the object involved in the race.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5974250
fbshipit-source-id: 351a576
Summary:
This diff does two things:
# Infer no longer add the contrains that the return value of a skip function is never null. This was leading to false negatives and is not necessary as those return value are treated angelically
# Infer now support `Nonnull` on the return value of skip functions.
Reviewed By: jberdine, sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5840324
fbshipit-source-id: bbd8d82
Summary: Infer can then detect the resource leak when resources are stored into a container
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5887702
fbshipit-source-id: 6106cfb
Summary: The point of the tracing mode is to compute all the possible path leading to an error state. However, within a method, many of those paths are not feasibile in practice. This leads to many false alarms for the resource leak analysis.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5888695
fbshipit-source-id: 2dbc57b
Summary: Model the `remove(...)` and the `clear()` method of `HashMap`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5887674
fbshipit-source-id: c3f40ee
Summary: Handling the utility functions for asserting that we're on background thread.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5863435
fbshipit-source-id: 3ad95b5
Summary:
Previously, we just tracked a boolean representing whether we were possibly on the main thread (true) or definitely not on the main thread (false).
In order to start supporting `Thread.start`, `Runnable.run`, etc., we'll need something more expressive.
This diff introduces a lattice:
```
Any
/ \
Main Background
\ /
Unknown
```
as the new threads domain. The initial value is `Unknown`, and we introduce `Main` in situations where we would have introduced `true` before.
This (mostly) preserves behavior: the main difference is that before code like
```
if (*) {
assertMainThread()
} else {
x.f = ...
}
```
would have recorded that the access to `x.f` was on the main thread, whereas now we'll say that it's on an unknown thread.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D5860256
fbshipit-source-id: efee330
Summary:
It's useful to be able to disable de-duplication on the command line with `--no-filtering`.
Gate de-duplication with `Config.filtering` and move the de-duplication tests to a new directory under the build systems tests.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5865329
fbshipit-source-id: 5094f5b
Nikos Gorogiannis
Sam Blackshear
Jeremy Dubreil
Tony Hu
Radu Grigore
Daiva Naudziuniene
Peter O'Hearn
Mehdi Bouaziz
Anders Papitto
Jules Villard
Josh Berdine