Summary:
In a summary, you never want to see a trace where non-footprint sources flow to a sink.
Such a trace is useless because nothing the caller does can make more data flow into that sink.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5779983
fbshipit-source-id: d06778a
Summary:
1. Mark some Makefile targets as depending on `MAKEFILE_LIST` so they get rebuilt on Makefile changes
2. Do not show boolean options with no documentation in the man pages (like we do for other option types).
3. Default to Lazy dynamic dispatch for the checkers.
4. In the tests, use `--<checker>-only` instead of relying on `--no-default-checkers`
5. `--no-filtering` is redundant if `--debug-exceptions` is passed
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6030578
fbshipit-source-id: 3320f0a
Summary:
Since D5381239, infer is careful not to delete directories that do not "look
like" results directories on startup, in case the user passed, eg, `-o /`.
In our repo, lots of results dir are created by build/test of infer, and when
the version of infer changes and the expected contents of results directories
change then it might start refusing to delete the results directories created
with another version of infer.
Add an option to force infer to delete the results directory no matter how
dodgy it looks, and use it in our repo by adding the option in every
.inferconfig.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5870984
fbshipit-source-id: 09412de
Summary:
Sort the complete set of warnings by everything except procname, then de-duplicate.
This scheme prevents reporting identical error messages on the same line/same file.
This is important for avoiding duplicate reports on multiple instantiations of the same template.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5819467
fbshipit-source-id: 984f47f
Summary: With this, we can now get now get inter-procedural issues involving native methods.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5730638
fbshipit-source-id: 3bdbdbd
Summary:
A function can both be a sink and propagate source info, but we currently ignore the summary for any function that is also a sink.
This will cause us to under-report for (e.g.) `src1 = source(); src2 = strcpy(dest, src1); exec(src2)`.
This is both a potential buffer overflow and a potential shell injection, but we won't report the second issue.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5676167
fbshipit-source-id: 232ab2f
Summary:
Instead of a whitelist and blacklist and default issue types and default
blacklist and filtering, consider a simpler semantics where
1. checkers can be individually turned on or off on the command line
2. most checkers are on by default
3. `--no-filtering` turns all issue types on, but they can then be turned off again by further arguments
This provides a more flexible CLI and is similar to other options in the infer
CLI, where "global" behaviour is generally avoided.
Dynamically created checkers (eg, AL linters) cause some complications in the
implementation but I think the semantics is still clear.
Also change the name of the option to mention "issue types" instead of
"checks", since the latter can be confused with "checkers".
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5583238
fbshipit-source-id: 21de476
Summary:
When a sink name is specified in `.inferconfig` or in OCaml, it might conflict with a function of the same name that has a different number of args.
We shouldn't try to create a sink in this case, and we definitely shouldn't crash.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5561216
fbshipit-source-id: fa1859b
Summary: Adding to the Quandary tests, the list of tests that are already working for the bi-abduction based taint analysis.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5395734
fbshipit-source-id: c4f2e79
Summary: We were almost always using `~report_reachable:true`, and in the cases where we weren't it is fine to do so. In general, a sink could read any state from its parameters, so it makes sense to complain if anything reachable from them is tainted.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5169067
fbshipit-source-id: ea7d659
Summary:
For now, we just support clearing the taint on a return value.
Ideally, we would associate a kind with the sanitizer and only clear taint that matches that kind.
However, it's fairly complicated to make that work properly with footprint sources.
I have some ideas about how to do it with passthroughs instead, but let's just do the simple thing for now.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5141906
fbshipit-source-id: a5b8b5e
Summary:
If we couldn't project the callee access path into the caller during summary application, we still added the corresponding trace to the caller state.
This was wasteful; it just bloats the caller with state it will never look at.
Fixed it by making `get_caller_ap_node` return `None` when the state won't be visible in the caller.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4727937
fbshipit-source-id: 87665e9
Summary:
This is step further simplify the code to avoid cases where the summary of the procedure being analyzed can exist in two different versions:
# one version is the summary passed as parameter to every checker
# the other is a copy of the summary in the in-memory specs table
This diff implements:
# the analysis always run through the `Ondemand` module (was already the case before)
# the summary of the procedure being analyzed is created at the beginning of the on-demand analysis call
# all the checkers run in sequence, update their respective part of the payload and log errors to the error table
# the summary is store at the end of the on-demand analysis call
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4787414
fbshipit-source-id: 2d115c9
Summary: Run all the checkers one after each other, which allows the Infer AI framework to run several checkers together, including the possibility for them to collaborate.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4621838
fbshipit-source-id: e264d67
Summary:
There was a bug where we allowed ourselves to project local variables from the callee summary into an access path in the caller.
We should only be able to project callee variables that are in the footprint.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4684868
fbshipit-source-id: 53a2b9d
Summary: In some cases where a function is called directly on a formal (e.g, `def foo(o) { callSomething(o) }`, we were failing to propagate the footprint trace to the caller.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4502404
fbshipit-source-id: d4d632f
Summary:
If we have code like
```
o.setF(source())
sink(o)
```
and `setF` is an unknown method, we probably want to report.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil, mburman
Differential Revision: D4438896
fbshipit-source-id: 5edd204
Sam Blackshear
Jules Villard
Jeremy Dubreil
Martino Luca