Summary: Report at most one read/write race or unprotected write per access path per method
Reviewed By: sblackshear, jvillard
Differential Revision: D4590815
fbshipit-source-id: 3c3a9d9
Summary:
To address a common source of false positives observed in D4494901.
We don't do anything with `release` yet, but can model it as releasing ownership in the future if we want to enforce correct usage of `SynchronizedPool`'s.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4593635
fbshipit-source-id: 621e937
Summary: Reports on reads that have one or more conflicting writes. When you report, say which other methods race with it.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4538793
fbshipit-source-id: 47ce700
Summary: Thread-local variables can't be shared between threads, so it's safe to mutate them outside of synchronization
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4568316
fbshipit-source-id: 0634cad
Summary:
Enrich the domain of SIOF to contain, as well as the globals needed by a
procedure, the globals that the procedure initializes. Also add the possibility
to model some procedures as initializing some variables. Use that mechanism to
teach the checker about `std::ios_base::Init`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D4588284
fbshipit-source-id: d72fc87
Summary:
Reimplement whitelists as a match against a single regexp. This allows one to
precompile the whitelist regexp to make fast check against a whitelist of fuzzy
qualifiers, instead of checks linear in the number of items in the whitelist.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D4588278
fbshipit-source-id: 3bac614
Summary:
This gives a way for users to flag safe methods regarding SIOF, for instance if
the problematic paths in the method cannot happen before `main()` has started.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D4578700
fbshipit-source-id: 6542dcf
Summary:
A good first step in order to run multiple checkers together is to prevent the analysis the analysis to side effect on the summaries of the method being analyzed from disk, or the shared specs summary. The idea is that `Ondemand` creates a summary for the procedure being analyzed and only saves the summary once all the checkers have been run. The summary for the caller (i.e. the procedure being analyzed) should never be looked up from disk during the analysis. In other words, the analysis should only ever lookup the summaries of the callees and the proposed solution to enforce this is to have `Ondemand.analyze_proc_name` be the only way to lookup the summary of a procedure.
Another objective is to make sure that the summaries are never saved to disk more than once.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4549764
fbshipit-source-id: f0a6e21
Summary:
We waste a lot of space storing the types of field accesses and comparing them sets/maps with access paths.
Yet almost none of the code ever looks at these types (only a tiny piece of code in thread-safety).
If we know the base type, we have enough information to recover the type of the field.
Let's do that instead.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4567996
fbshipit-source-id: e7fd2da
Summary: Should stop us from reporting on benign races of fields that are caching resources.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4538037
fbshipit-source-id: 15236b4
Summary: This will be important for maintaining ownership of `View`'s, which involve a lot of casting.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4520441
fbshipit-source-id: fdef226
Summary:
Previously, we would lose track of ownership in code like
```
Obj owned = new Obj();
Obj stillOwned = id(owned); // would lose ownership here
stillOwned.f = ... // would report false alarm here
```
This diff partially addresses the problem by adding a notion of "unconditional" (always owned) or "conditional" (owned if some formal at index i is owned) ownership.
Now we can handle simple examples like the one above.
I say "partially" because we still can't handle cases where there are different reasons for conditional ownership, such as
```
oneOrTwo(Obj o1, Obj o2) { if (*) return o1; else return o2; } // we won't understand that this maintains ownership if both formals are owned
Obj stillOwned = oneOrTwo(owned1, owned2);
stillOwned.f = ... // we'll report a false alarm here
```
This can be addressed in the future, but will require slightly more work
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4520069
fbshipit-source-id: 99c7418
Summary: This will make it a cinch to track new "attributes" of memory locations, and to propagate more complex attributes such as conditional ownership (coming in a future diff).
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4523143
fbshipit-source-id: 57aa133
Summary: Being forced to separately define `pp_element`/`pp_key` is uneccessary and makes it more cumbersome to create a set/map from an existing module that already defines `pp`.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4517308
fbshipit-source-id: 9b17c9c
Summary:
At one point I thought we'd want to have lots of different schedulers for things like exploring loops in different orders, but that hasn't materialized.
Let's make the common use-case simpler by hiding the `Scheduler` parameter inside the `AbstractInterpreter` module.
We can always expose `MakeWithScheduler` later if we want to.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D4508095
fbshipit-source-id: 726e051
Summary:
This fixes false positives we had in fields written by callees of a constructor (see new E2E test).
This is also a bit cleaner than what we did before; instead of special-casing constructors, we just use the existing ownership concept.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4505161
fbshipit-source-id: a739ebc
Summary:
Constants are always "owned" in the sense that no one can mutate them.
In code like
```
Obj getX(boolean b) {
if (b) {
return null;
}
return new Obj();
}
```
, we need to understand this in order to infer that the returned value is owned.
This should fix a few FP's that I've seen.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4485452
fbshipit-source-id: beae15b
Summary: The method `junit.framework.TestCase.setUp()` is always run before the other methods by the JUnit testing framework. So the method act as a class initializer.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4487371
fbshipit-source-id: 1998801
Summary:
This diff adds a set of access paths holding a value returned from a method annotated with Functional to the domain.
If a "functional" value is written to a field, we won't count that right as an unprotected access.
The idea is to be able to use the Functional annotation to get rid of benign race false positive, such as:
```
Functional T iAlwaysReturnTheSameThing();
T mCache;
T memoizedGetter() {
if (mCache == null) {
mCache = iAlwaysReturnTheSameThing();
}
return mCache;
}
```
Although there is a write-write race on `mCache`, we don't care because it will be assigned to the same value regardless of which writer wins.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4476492
fbshipit-source-id: cfa5dfc
Summary:
We warn on unsafe accesses to fields that occur in a public method (or are reachable from a public method).
We ought not to consider VisibleForTesting methods as public, since they are only public for testing purposes.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4477648
fbshipit-source-id: 5f58914
Summary:
The thread-safety and annotation reachibility analyses were defining ugly custom versions of override_exists with refs.
Let's give them a canonical, ref-free version instead.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D4475777
fbshipit-source-id: 0bb45fc
Summary: Simple model for List methods that write to the collection.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4453381
fbshipit-source-id: 19edc51
Summary:
One of the things that confuses me about the current annotations API is that there's a lot of ways to do the same thing.
Some of the concepts like `annotated_signature` are only really needed by Eradicate.
This diff removes usages of `annotated_signature` outside of Eradicate (everyone else was just using `get_annotated_signature` as a roundabout way to get the return annotation of a procedure).
In the future, I'll move `get_annotated_signature` and other Eradicate-specific functionality into its own module inside the Eradicate directory.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D4472058
fbshipit-source-id: 5bb0846
Summary:
`pdesc_has_annot` checks the annotations of both the return values and the parameters, which seems like a bad idea in general.
The client should have to specify which annotations they actually care about.
Converting existing uses of `pdesc_has_annot` to what I read as the intended behavior (checking the return annotation).
Will make better use of the other new functions in a follow-up.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4469885
fbshipit-source-id: de5531e
Summary:
Previously, we would correctly be silent on code like `x = new T(); x.f = ...`, but would wrongly warn on code like `x = makeT(); x.f = ...`.
The reason is that we only allowed ownership through direct allocation.
This diff adds a boolean that specifies whether the return value is owned as part of the summary.
This allows us to correctly handle many common cases of (transitively) returning a freshly allocated object, but still won't work for understanding that ownership is maintained in examples like
`x = new T(); y = id(x); y.f = ...`.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D4456864
fbshipit-source-id: b5eec02
Cristiano Calcagno
Peter O'Hearn
Sam Blackshear
Jules Villard
Jeremy Dubreil
Kihong Heo