Summary:
More newer = more better.
This flips the Not_found -> Not_found_s switch, and forbids a bunch more
polymorphic comparisons (mostly turned into `int` comparisons for
convenience). Earlier diffs prepare for this so this diff is only about
breaking changes in the API, of which there are only a few.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D19861583
fbshipit-source-id: fe54ce8f0
Summary:
This diff adds a taint domain in Inferbo. The taint value will be used to find vulnerable array
accesses in the following diffs.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D19391028
fbshipit-source-id: 566b4c0fe
Summary:
Quoting the doc:
> `dune check` builds the minimal set of targets required for tooling
support. Essentially, this is .cmi, .cmt, .cmti, and .merlin files.
So, running `make check` can be a tad faster and more economical
way to typecheck the code as you develop (and make merlin understand
what's going on).
We already had `check` taget defined in `infer/src/Makefile` but it
was not exposed at the top level. Fixing it.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D19619920
fbshipit-source-id: c143cecd8
Summary:
Kill these tests as that mode is not supported anymore.
Note that :
- "buck_cross_module" was effectively already dead since it's not hooked up to `make test`
- "buck" is actually another copy of "genrule" so wasn't testing anything
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D19176166
fbshipit-source-id: b5bb90448
Summary:
Inferbo does not use the external relational domains, apron and elina. At some point, the parts of
inferbo using them were broken and they do not seem to be fixed easily in the near future. Let's
remove them and keep the code base cleaner.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D19022905
fbshipit-source-id: e0eafe79f
Summary: The new domain is much better than the old one. Let's kill the old one (along with old litho tests) and simplify things.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18959627
fbshipit-source-id: df77ae20e
Summary:
Let's add basic Java support to impurity checker. Since impurity checker relies on pulse, we need to add Java with Pulse callback as well. Pulse doesn't officially support Java yet, but we can enable it for impurity checker for now.
Many Java primitives/operations are not yet modeled (such as creation of new objects, support for collections etc.). Still, it is good to run impurity checker on the existing tests of the purity checker. Also, it is nice to see that we can identify most of the impure functions correctly in the purity dir. There are a lot of FNs though.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17906237
fbshipit-source-id: 15308d285
Summary:
Introduce a new experimental checker (`--impurity`) that detects
impurity information, tracking which parameters and global variables
of a function are modified. The checker relies on Pulse to detect how
the state changes: it traverses the pre and post pairs starting from
the parameter/global variable and finds where the pre and post heaps
diverge. At diversion points, we expect to see WrittenTo/Invalid attributes
containing a trace of how the address was modified. We use these to
construct the trace of impurity.
This checker is a complement to the purity checker that exists mainly
for Java (and used for cost and loop-hoisting analyses). The aim of
this new experimental checker is to rely on Pulse's precise
memory treatment and come up with a more precise im(purity)
analysis. To distinguish the two checkers, we introduce a new issue
type `IMPURE_FUNCTION` that reports when a function is impure, rather
than when it is pure (as in the purity checker).
TODO:
- improve the analysis to rely on impurity information of external
library calls. Currently, all library calls are assumed to be nops,
hence pure.
- de-entangle Pulse reporting from analysis.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17051567
fbshipit-source-id: 5e10afb4f
Summary:
In D17156724, we forked nullsafe tests, which was a strategy to
introduce nullsafe-gradual mode back then.
The reason was "gradual" mode is a pretty big change in a way Infer
handles annotations, so we wanted to tests both scenarios: gradual and
non-gradual mode.
The plan was to deprecate "non-gradual" tests at some point, hence we
decided to go with duplication.
Now we have a better approach to ensure "gradual" features are well
covered. The approach is the following.
1. [Mostly finished] Improve existings tests so that they cover negative and positive
cases. With this, we can safely add something like
--non-annotated-default UNKNOWN_NULLABILITY to the test config and be sure tests still make
sense (i.e. don't pass simply because annotations don't make sense
anymore)
2. [In progress]. Refactor nullsafe code so that instead of using of Annot.ml everywhere we use a special abstraction telling if the class is annotated with Nullable, Nonnull, or not annotated. With this change, we essenstially have a single place we need to test, which removes the need to have 2 pair of tests for each feature.
3. [To be done]. Introduce Uknown nullability and add small number of tests specifically
for that feature (together with existing tests).
NOTE: I did not rename `nullsafe-default` back to `nullsafe` to not
pollute blame without need.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17395743
fbshipit-source-id: 3d3e062f6
Summary: Adding a test to the top level makefile that I forgot to add (ooops)
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17366065
fbshipit-source-id: 8111ccf7a
Summary: This shows that the current Pulse analyzer works fine in the C++ part of the Objc++ files.
Reviewed By: martintrojer
Differential Revision: D17225683
fbshipit-source-id: faf51c5fa
Summary:
In next diff, we are going to introduce a new mode of nullsafe
(gradual). For testing, we are going to employ the strategy used by jvillard
for Pulse.
In this diff we split tests into two subfolders, one for the default and one for the gradual
mode.
We are planning to make the gradual mode default eventually. For that, most
new features will make sense for gradual mode, and we will mostly evolve
tests for that mode.
As for 'default' mode, we need to preserve tests mostly to ensure we don't introduce
regressions.
Occasionally, we might make changes that make sense for both modes, in
this (expected relatively rare) cases we will make changes to both set
of tests.
An alternative strategy would be to have two sets of issues.exp files,
one for gradual and one for default mode. This has an advantage of each
java file to be always tested twice, but disadvantage is that it will be
harder to write meaningful test code so that it makes sense for both
modes simultaneously.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17156724
fbshipit-source-id: a92a9208f
Summary:
- run the tests! they weren't hooked up to the main Makefile :/
- add some html debug messages
- formatting
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16895578
fbshipit-source-id: e96d737cc
Summary: Test that cost analysis works with incremental analysis enabled
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16620101
fbshipit-source-id: b41403954
Summary:
It's not being worked on and is not in a state where it works.
It would probably better to write this as a script of some kind or else
resurrect this subcommand in a form where it behaves more like a script,
ie fork/execs infer analyses instead of having them be function calls
(but then it might as well *be* a script as it would likely be more
flexible).
In any case...
youarealreadydead
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16602417
fbshipit-source-id: d0d129539
Summary:
These have proved to be too fragile to maintain as they would often break
compilation of user code. They have been off by default for more than a year
now (D7350715).
Removing the include models shows a more accurate picture of what infer results
look like in production. As such, lots of tests have changed, mostly
biabduction but also in inferbo. SIOF was using include-based models too but
now libc++ is better and iostreams are implemented in a way that SIOF
understands (instead of being magical creatures) so nothing changed there.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16602171
fbshipit-source-id: ce38f045b
Summary:
Write a test for the invalidation of changed procedures
Reverse analysis graph for this test: https://fburl.com/graphviz/ybidpidq
The procedures marked as changed are `a` and `d`, and this causes `a,b,c,d,e,main` to be invalidated as expected
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D16579526
fbshipit-source-id: cbec304ce
Summary:
Add test `incremental_analysis_remove_file` to the toplevel makefile so that it is called by `make test` etc
Also swapped the src_before and src_after files so the test checks file removal instead of addition.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D16562340
fbshipit-source-id: 79bab5f66
Summary:
The default values of config options can sometimes depend on build-time
configuration values. This makes checking that the manuals "remain the same"
trickier as the manuals can be different depending on the platform. This
removes *all* default values from the checked-in manuals. We could be more
fine-grained and scrub only the values that are susceptible to change but for
now this is probably good enough.
This is done by implementing new options `--help-scrubbed` and
`--help-scrubbed-full` and using these in our tests instead of `--help` and
`--help-full` (which remain unaffected).
Also don't wrap the default values in `$(i,...)` anymore because the defaults
can trigger line breaks and then the man page is ill-formatted because that
format is stupid.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D16543779
fbshipit-source-id: bc929ff8c
Summary: This test wasn't building correctly or being called by the toplevel makefile
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D16458386
fbshipit-source-id: 48a0c2f36
Summary:
newer is better, right?
All the code changes in infer are because of core being bumped to v0.12.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D16223183
fbshipit-source-id: f3c339966
Summary:
Replaced by pulse. `--ownership` is now a deprecated form of `--pulse`.
The ownership checker is starting to give wrong answers due to changes in the
clang frontend, so it's better to remove it in favour of pulse.
there_goes_my_hero
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16107650
fbshipit-source-id: bb2446a19
Summary:
This is a simple checker that identifies inefficient uses of `keySet` iterator where (not only the key but also) the value is accessed via `get(key)`. It is more efficient to use `entrySet` iterator which already returns both key-value pairs. This optimization would get rid of many extra lookups which can be expensive.
We simply traverse the CFG starting from the loop head upwards and pick up the map that is iterated over. Then, we check in the loop nodes if there is a call to `get(...)` over this map. If, so we report.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D15737779
fbshipit-source-id: 702465b4e
Summary:
That test wasn't hooked up to `make test` and so regressed at some
unknown time in the past. Just recording the new state of things for
now.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D15495234
fbshipit-source-id: 14fb112de
Summary:
TOPL properties are essentially automata, which specify a bad pattern.
This commit is just a parser for them.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D14477671
fbshipit-source-id: c38a8ef37
Jules Villard
Sungkeun Cho
Artem Pianykh
Ezgi Çiçek
Nikos Gorogiannis
Josh Berdine
Dulma Churchill
Mitya Lyubarskiy
Phoebe Nichols
Martin Trojer
Radu Grigore