Summary:
Simpler bug hash that is more independent of the underlying analysis. This now computes the hash based on:
- the bug type.
- the base filename: i.e for my/source/File.java, just keep File.java. So the hash will not change when moving files around.
- the simple method name: i.e. without package information and list of parameters. So changing the list of parameters will not affect the bug hash.
- the error message were the line numbers have been removed. So moving code or reformatting will not affect the hash.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D6445639
fbshipit-source-id: 82e3cbe
Summary:
Sort the complete set of warnings by everything except procname, then de-duplicate.
This scheme prevents reporting identical error messages on the same line/same file.
This is important for avoiding duplicate reports on multiple instantiations of the same template.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5819467
fbshipit-source-id: 984f47f
Summary: With this, we can now get now get inter-procedural issues involving native methods.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5730638
fbshipit-source-id: 3bdbdbd
Summary:
A function can both be a sink and propagate source info, but we currently ignore the summary for any function that is also a sink.
This will cause us to under-report for (e.g.) `src1 = source(); src2 = strcpy(dest, src1); exec(src2)`.
This is both a potential buffer overflow and a potential shell injection, but we won't report the second issue.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5676167
fbshipit-source-id: 232ab2f
Summary:
Instead of a whitelist and blacklist and default issue types and default
blacklist and filtering, consider a simpler semantics where
1. checkers can be individually turned on or off on the command line
2. most checkers are on by default
3. `--no-filtering` turns all issue types on, but they can then be turned off again by further arguments
This provides a more flexible CLI and is similar to other options in the infer
CLI, where "global" behaviour is generally avoided.
Dynamically created checkers (eg, AL linters) cause some complications in the
implementation but I think the semantics is still clear.
Also change the name of the option to mention "issue types" instead of
"checks", since the latter can be confused with "checkers".
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5583238
fbshipit-source-id: 21de476
Summary: Adding to the Quandary tests, the list of tests that are already working for the bi-abduction based taint analysis.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5395734
fbshipit-source-id: c4f2e79
Summary: We were almost always using `~report_reachable:true`, and in the cases where we weren't it is fine to do so. In general, a sink could read any state from its parameters, so it makes sense to complain if anything reachable from them is tainted.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5169067
fbshipit-source-id: ea7d659
Summary:
For now, we just support clearing the taint on a return value.
Ideally, we would associate a kind with the sanitizer and only clear taint that matches that kind.
However, it's fairly complicated to make that work properly with footprint sources.
I have some ideas about how to do it with passthroughs instead, but let's just do the simple thing for now.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5141906
fbshipit-source-id: a5b8b5e
Summary:
If we couldn't project the callee access path into the caller during summary application, we still added the corresponding trace to the caller state.
This was wasteful; it just bloats the caller with state it will never look at.
Fixed it by making `get_caller_ap_node` return `None` when the state won't be visible in the caller.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4727937
fbshipit-source-id: 87665e9
Summary:
This is step further simplify the code to avoid cases where the summary of the procedure being analyzed can exist in two different versions:
# one version is the summary passed as parameter to every checker
# the other is a copy of the summary in the in-memory specs table
This diff implements:
# the analysis always run through the `Ondemand` module (was already the case before)
# the summary of the procedure being analyzed is created at the beginning of the on-demand analysis call
# all the checkers run in sequence, update their respective part of the payload and log errors to the error table
# the summary is store at the end of the on-demand analysis call
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4787414
fbshipit-source-id: 2d115c9
Summary: Run all the checkers one after each other, which allows the Infer AI framework to run several checkers together, including the possibility for them to collaborate.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4621838
fbshipit-source-id: e264d67
Summary:
There was a bug where we allowed ourselves to project local variables from the callee summary into an access path in the caller.
We should only be able to project callee variables that are in the footprint.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4684868
fbshipit-source-id: 53a2b9d
Summary: In some cases where a function is called directly on a formal (e.g, `def foo(o) { callSomething(o) }`, we were failing to propagate the footprint trace to the caller.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4502404
fbshipit-source-id: d4d632f
Summary:
If we have code like
```
o.setF(source())
sink(o)
```
and `setF` is an unknown method, we probably want to report.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil, mburman
Differential Revision: D4438896
fbshipit-source-id: 5edd204
Summary: Need to upgrade in order to specify some taint properties on a more recent `WebView` API.
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D4382590
fbshipit-source-id: 0925742
Summary:
We currently can only model the return values of functions as sources.
In order to model inputs of endpoints as sources, we need the capability to treat the formals of certain functions as sources too.
This diff adds that capability by adding a function for getting the tainted sources to the source module, then using that info in the analysis.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4314738
fbshipit-source-id: dd7d423
Summary:
Previously, summaries worked by flattening the access tree representing the post of the procedure into (in essence) a list of functions from caller input traces to callee output traces.
This is inefficient in many ways, and is also much more complex than just using the original access tree as the summary.
One big inefficiency of the old way is this: calling `Trace.append` is slow, and we want to do it as few times as possible.
Under the old summary system, we would do it at most once for each "function" in the summary list.
Now, we'll do it at most once for each node in the access tree summary.
This will be a smaller number of calls, since each node can summarize many input/output relationships.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4271579
fbshipit-source-id: 34e407a
Summary:
We only ought to report a source-sink flow at the call site where the sink is introduced.
Otherwise, we will report silly false positives.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4234766
fbshipit-source-id: 118051f
Jeremy Dubreil
Sam Blackshear
Jules Villard
Martino Luca