Summary:
There are two changes:
1/ Fix incorrect merge of two cases (empty and not-empty)
```
let<*> astate_equal_zero = ... in
let<*> astate_not_zero = ... in
[Ok (ContinueProgram astate_equal_zero); Ok (ContinueProgram astate_not_zero)]
```
This was an incorrect merge, because if there is an error in the former
case `astate_equal_zero`, it doesn't even evaluate the latter case
`astate_not_zero`.
2/ Cover all cases precisely. There are actually three cases to cover:
* `TextUtils.is_empty(null) = true`
* `TextUtils.is_empty("") = true`
* `TextUtils.is_empty("abc") = false`
However, in the previous model, it missed the second case.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D29393579
fbshipit-source-id: e59d9a60d
Summary:
This diff adds some semantic models for C++ string length. It introduces
an virtual field for string length and use the value in the models.
* basic_string constructor given a constant string
* string.empty
* string.length
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D29390815
fbshipit-source-id: 99d67e48e
Summary:
Unknown functions may create false positives as well as false negatives
for Pulse. Let's consider that unknown functions behave "functionally",
or at least that a functional behaviour is a possible behaviour for
them: when called with the same parameter values, they should return the
same value.
This is implemented purely in the arithmetic domain by recording
`v_return = f_unknown(v1, v2, ..., vN)` for each call to unknown
functions `f_unknown` with values `v1`, `v2`, ..., `vN` (and return
`v_return`). The hope is that this will create more false negatives than
false positives, as several FPs have been observed on real code that
would be suppressed with this heuristic.
The other effect this has on reports is to record hypotheses made on the
return values of unknown functions into the "pruned" part of formulas,
which inhibits reporting on paths whose feasibility depends on the
return value of unknown functions (by making these issues latent
instead). This should allow us to control the amount of FPs until we
model more functions.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D27798275
fbshipit-source-id: d31cfb8b6
Summary:
Turns out the mistake was pretty simple: we just forgot to keep the
history of the return value in the callee and add it to the caller's.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28385941
fbshipit-source-id: 40fe09c99
Summary:
- Changed "passed as argument to f" to "in call to f", as these do not
always correspond to passing an argument (eg could be a value returned
from f)
- Changed "assigned" to "returned" when appropriate
- Changed the model of malloc() to not say "allocated" in the null case
- Don't print "returned from f" when there was no event inside f: just
print "in call to f".
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28413900
fbshipit-source-id: bc85625e3
Summary:
The order was reversed when printing the trace, leading to confusion.
Also make sure we indicate which part of the trace we are printing when
there is more than one part (either context + access or invalidation +
access, or all three).
Also start nesting at <calling context length> to better represent the
role of the calling context visually.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28329263
fbshipit-source-id: b691fb1f4
Summary:
There's been regressions in --pulse-isl. Without tests, everything is
temporary!
Note: the regressions are presumably still there, this just records the
current status of pulse.isl.
Also, no objective-C(++) at the moment. Should we add them too? (in
another diff)
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28256703
fbshipit-source-id: 700b2cc57
Summary:
A previous change made pulse look into value histories for causes of
invalidation in case the access trace of a value already contained the
reason why that value is invalid, in order to save printing the
invalidation trace in addition to the access trace. It also made
reporting more accurate for null dereference as the source of null was
often better identified (in cases where several values are null or
zero).
But, the history is also relevant to the bug type and the error message.
Make these take histories into account too.
Also fix a bug where we didn't look inside the sub-histories contained
within function calls when looking for an invalidation along the
history.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28254334
fbshipit-source-id: 5ca00ee54
Summary:
Building on the infra in the previous commits, "fix" all the call sites
that introduce invalidations to make sure they also update the
corresponding histories. This is only possible to do when the access
leading to the invalidation can be recorded. Right now the only place
that's untraceable is the model of `free`/`delete`, because it happens
to be the only place where we invalidate an address without knowing
where it comes from (`free(v)`: what was v's access path? we could track
this in the future).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28118764
fbshipit-source-id: de67f449e
Summary:
As explained in the previous diff: when the access trace goes through
the invalidation step there is no need to print the invalidation trace
at all.
Note: only a few sources of invalidation are handled at the moment. The
following diffs gradually fix the other sources of invalidation.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28098335
fbshipit-source-id: 5a5e6481e
Summary:
The eventual goal is to stop having separate sections of the trace
("invalidation part" + "access part") when the "access part" already
goes through the invalidation step. For this, it needs to record when a
value is made invalid along the path.
This is also important for assignements to NULL/0/nullptr/nil: right now
the way we record that 0 is not a valid address is via an attribute
attached to the abstract value that corresponds to 0. This makes traces
inconsistent sometimes: 0 can appear in many places in the same function
and we won't necessarily pick the correct one. In other words, attaching
traces to *values* is fragile, as the same value can be produced in many
ways. On the other hand, histories are stored at the point of access, eg
x->f, so have a much better chance of being correct. See added test:
right now its traces is completely wrong and makes the 0 in `if
(utf16StringLen == 0)` the source of the NULL value instead of the
return of `malloc()`!
This diff makes the traces slightly more verbose for now but this is
fixed in a following diff as the traces that got longer are those that
don't actually need an "invalidation" trace.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28098337
fbshipit-source-id: e17929259
Summary:
Fixing `IsInstanceOf` term simplification for null case. Before, this
was only being done if value was known to be null at the moment of the
call to `instanceof`. Otherwise, the `IsInstanceOf` term would remain in
the formula unnecessarily.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D27361025
fbshipit-source-id: 2d958a757
Summary:
Models for Java Map interface.
This consists of `Map.init()`, `Map.put(key, value)`, `Map.get(key)`,
`Map.containsKey(key)` and
`Map.isEmpty()`. With the exception of `Map.get(key)` and `Map.containsKey(key)`, these functions were modelled using the respective similar ones provided by the Java Collection interface.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D27326716
fbshipit-source-id: e07f0c952
Summary:
Changing model for Java `Collection` interface. Every collection has now two internal fields, initially set to `null`. We also keep an extra field to compute emptiness. This model was implemented based on the [preexisting model for HashMap](https://github.com/facebook/infer/blob/master/infer/models/java/src/java/util/HashMap.java).
Existing models (`add`, `remove`, `set` and `is_empty`) have been updated accordingly and new models are provided: `init` and `clear`.
This model is not yet compatible with the `Map` interface but this change will happen very soon.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D27126815
fbshipit-source-id: 79a5fe306
Summary: Adding option to suppress errors involving unknown code. If `--pulse-report-ignore-unknown-java-methods-patterns` is provided, reports containing skipped functions not matching at least one of the given regexps are suppressed.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26820575
fbshipit-source-id: b6e1df7b2
Summary:
Adapting error messages in Pulse so that they become more intuitive for
developers.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26887140
fbshipit-source-id: 896970ba2
Summary:
Providing model for the android function TextUtils.isEmpty(). For now,
this always returns false assuming that the given value is not null.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26779619
fbshipit-source-id: 3d8e26813
Summary: Adding support for the Java instanceof operator in Pulse.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26275046
fbshipit-source-id: 8ba608cca
Summary: Adding temporary model for Collections/Map isEmpty() as an attempt to reduce false positives before we provide a full model for Collections.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D26724085
fbshipit-source-id: d3418c173
Summary:
Providing model for Java `instanceof` operator that
avoids to return true when given object is null. This is a temporary
solution that will reduce FPs while we do not provide the correct
semantics for `instanceof`.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26608043
fbshipit-source-id: 87c82b906
Summary:
Instead of recording some facts as "known" (i.e., observed assignments),
record them as "pruned". This should be done any time the fact is not an
assignment, for instance when path-splitting on "is the argument =0?" as
in the model of `free()`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D26450362
fbshipit-source-id: 4fc980f90
Summary:
Modeling Java instanceof operator in Pulse. This
implementation does not yet provide the proper semantics for instanceof.
For now, it will always return true. This is temporary and should reduce the false positive rate.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D26317089
fbshipit-source-id: 494e3dec5
Summary:
providing models for the checkState and checkArgument
functions, both used in Java code.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D26101726
fbshipit-source-id: 0cc73d252
Summary: Creating model for the checkNotNull function from the Preconditions class in Pulse (Java). Whenever `checkNotNull(x)` is called, Pulse will assume that `x!= null`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D26075176
fbshipit-source-id: 40dcd395b
Summary: Allowing Pulse NPE reports on Nullsafe classes to be suppressed. This is now possible via the optional argument --pulse-nullsafe-report-npe (default: true).
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D25997321
fbshipit-source-id: 98465df79
Summary: Copying Java biabduction tests into pulse tests folder. The goal is to check how well Pulse will perform on Java.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25901299
fbshipit-source-id: a117b44f5
Summary:
Take another page from the Incorrectness Logic book and refrain from reporting issues on paths unless we know for sure that this path will be taken.
Previously, we would report on paths that are merely *not impossible*. This goes very far in the other direction, so it's possible we'll want to go back to some sort of middle ground. Or maybe not. See the changes in the tests to get a sense of what we're missing.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D24014719
fbshipit-source-id: d451faf02
Summary:
The java frontend used an unsound flow insensitive class analysis to devirtualize
some virtual calls. We remove it and let the recent devirtualizer preanalysis do the job.
This unsoudness in the Java frontend may have been here for a long time. Removing it may
modify several analysis results (specially Nullsafe) where virtual calls may look different
now.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22662739
fbshipit-source-id: c45296dce
Summary:
Start with tests about dynamic dispatch to test the upcoming
pre-analysis.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21594496
fbshipit-source-id: 1771ea968
Sungkeun Cho
Daiva Naudziuniene
Loc Le
Jules Villard
Gabriela Cunha Sampaio
David Pichardie