Summary:
Unknown functions may create false positives as well as false negatives
for Pulse. Let's consider that unknown functions behave "functionally",
or at least that a functional behaviour is a possible behaviour for
them: when called with the same parameter values, they should return the
same value.
This is implemented purely in the arithmetic domain by recording
`v_return = f_unknown(v1, v2, ..., vN)` for each call to unknown
functions `f_unknown` with values `v1`, `v2`, ..., `vN` (and return
`v_return`). The hope is that this will create more false negatives than
false positives, as several FPs have been observed on real code that
would be suppressed with this heuristic.
The other effect this has on reports is to record hypotheses made on the
return values of unknown functions into the "pruned" part of formulas,
which inhibits reporting on paths whose feasibility depends on the
return value of unknown functions (by making these issues latent
instead). This should allow us to control the amount of FPs until we
model more functions.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D27798275
fbshipit-source-id: d31cfb8b6
Summary: Copying Java biabduction tests into pulse tests folder. The goal is to check how well Pulse will perform on Java.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25901299
fbshipit-source-id: a117b44f5
Daiva Naudziuniene
Jules Villard
Gabriela Cunha Sampaio