Summary: Recent improvements in join fixed `FP_allocate_in_branch_ok` because the variable was not read after the join.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13233441
fbshipit-source-id: 89b701e12
Summary: Delete function that would get a linter warning or not depending on the version of Xcode.
Reviewed By: martintrojer
Differential Revision: D13215750
fbshipit-source-id: 886ce397d
Summary:
It's useful for checkers to know when variables go out of scope to
perform garbage collection in their domains, especially for complex
domains with non-trivial joins. This makes the analyses more precise at
little cost.
This could have been added as a custom function call to a builtin, but I
decided against it because this instruction doesn't have the semantics
of any function call. It's better for each checker to explicitly not
deal with the custom instruction instead.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D13102951
fbshipit-source-id: 33be22fab
Summary:
Before, the liveness pre-analysis would place extra instructions in the
CFG for either:
1. marking an `Ident.t` as dead, or
2. marking a `Pvar.t` as `= 0`
But we have no way of marking pvars dead without setting them to 0. This
is bad because setting pvars to 0 is not possible everywhere they are
dead. Indeed, we only do it when we haven't seen their address being
taken anyway. This prevents the following situation, recorded in our tests:
```
int address_taken() {
int** x;
int* y;
int i = 7;
y = &i;
x = &y;
// if we don't reason about taken addresses while adding nullify instructions,
// we'll add
// `nullify(y)` here and report a false NPE on the next line
return **x;
}
```
So we want to mark pvars as dead without nullifying them. This diff
extends the `Remove_temps` SIL instruction to accept pvars as well, and
so renames it to `ExitScope`.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13102953
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f03a52
Summary:
It modifies sizes and offsets of array values on pointer castings.
Currently, it supports only simple castings of pointer-to-integers.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12920589
fbshipit-source-id: a5ba831b8
Summary:
It enables the translation of casting expression. As of now, it
translates only the castings of pointers to integer types, in order to
avoid too much of change, which may mess the checkers up.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12920568
fbshipit-source-id: a5489df24
Summary:
Useful to understand the changes in the pre-analysis, or to inspect the
CFG that checkers actually get.
This means that the pre-analysis always runs when we output the dotty,
but I don't really see a reason why not. In fact, we could probably
*always* store the CFGs as pre-analysed.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13102952
fbshipit-source-id: 89f3102ec
Summary: It fixes the conditions of the `check` function to address `is_collection_add` cases correctly.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13081281
fbshipit-source-id: 39ae5ef03
Summary:
Update clang plugin which now gives names to variables captured by lambdas that were empty before.
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12979015
fbshipit-source-id: 0b092fb24
Summary:
It turns out keeping attributes (such as invalidation facts) separate
from the memory is a bad idea and leads to loss of precision and false
positives, as seen in the new test (which previously generated a
report).
Allow me to illustrate on this example, which is a stylised version of
the issue in the added test: previously we'd have:
```
state1 = { x = 1; invalids={} }
state2 = { x = 2; invalids ={1} }
join(state1, state2) = { x = {1, 2}; invalids={{1, 2}} }
```
So even though none of the states said that `x` pointed to an invalid
location, the join state says it does because `1` and `2` have been
glommed together. The fact `x=1` from `state1` and the fact "1 is
invalid" from `state2` conspire together and `x` is now invalid even
though it shouldn't.
Instead, if we record attributes as part of the memory we get that `x`
is still valid after the join:
```
state1 = { x = (1, {}) }
state2 = { x = (2, {}) }
join(state1, state2) = { x = ({1, 2}, {}) }
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12958130
fbshipit-source-id: 53dc81cc7
Summary:
I hear that this scheduler is better. I want the best scheduler
possible. Also pulse's join is a bit complex so it might matter one day.
whydididothis
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12958131
fbshipit-source-id: 3bd77ccba
David Lively
Daiva Naudziuniene
Jules Villard
Sungkeun Cho
Ezgi Çiçek
Mehdi Bouaziz
Nikos Gorogiannis
Martino Luca
Dino Distefano