Summary:
This diff adds a false positive test that is introduced imprecise loop
invariant detection.
In the example, `i` and a temp variable `$irvar = get_size(arr)` are
all included in the control variables, so the complexity becomes
quadratic. The problem is that `$irvar` is not addressed as a loop
invariant:
* `is.read` is analyzed as modifying a global
* all return variables, including `$irvar`, of unmodeled functions are invalidated
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D23051414
fbshipit-source-id: 011fd086b
Summary:
In Cost/Inferbo checkers, it tried to find a subclass with heuristics when a method of interface or
abstract class is called. While it makes preciser analysis results in general, sometimes introduced
tricky FPs since the behavior of the heuristics depends on targets. This diff revert the heuristics
to suppress the FPs.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D22924485
fbshipit-source-id: 9f151231f
Summary: D17500386 had added the ability to give symbolic values on functions returning exceptions. However, this might cause FPs or cryptic complexity reports (especially with subclass heuristics). This diff aims to revert it back.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22764266
fbshipit-source-id: 1615544d8
Summary: `addAll` adds elements one by one and hence takes linear time. We didn't have a model for this and considered it O(1).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22375157
fbshipit-source-id: 65b82bfae
Summary: This diff prevents printing line numbers of loop in the trace description, which helps to keep the same descriptions even when the line number of a function is changed in tests.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22375584
fbshipit-source-id: 676d1a7cc
Summary:
This diff adds a model of `File.listFiles` as returning an array with
a symbolic length.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22332258
fbshipit-source-id: 6ca593b8b
Summary:
This diff tries to support a specific form of linked list iteration in Java.
```
while (p != null) {
p = p.getNext();
}
```
This example was a constant cost before because the cost checker could not detect that it is an iteration on a linked list.
The heuristic this diff implemented is:
(1) `p = p.getNext()`: It tries to find this specific form of assignment. Then, it increments `p.linked_list_index` by 1. Note that `linked_list_index` is a virtual field for keeping an index in the linked list. Its initial value is always 0.
(2) At `p != null`, it tries to prune the value of `p.linked_list_index`: the upper-bound of `p.linked_list_index` is pruned by `<= p.linked_list_length`. Here again, `p.linked_list_length` is also a virtual field to denote the length of the linked list.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22234892
fbshipit-source-id: 2fee176bb
Summary: We do not use an arbitrary threshold to test cost results anymore but instead rely on `cost-issues` which do not have any trace attached. This diff adds traces to `costs-report.json` so that we can test cost issues with traces.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21858846
fbshipit-source-id: e73321a92
Summary:
The model returns an array the length of which is the same to that of enum entries.
It takes the length of enum entries from the summary of `Enum.values` because it is not written in `tenv`. In order to do that, the model semantics should be able to request the summary of the function with `get_summary`, so I extended `model_env` to include the functionality.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21843319
fbshipit-source-id: d6f10eb91
Summary:
The model returns an array the length of which is the number of known
fields in `tenv`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21840375
fbshipit-source-id: 891517c6e
Summary:
In order to test cost analysis results, currently we rely on having an arbitrary cost threshold (200) and report issues that exceed this cost. For instance, a cost of 201 is considered expensive and reported as `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME` issue in cost tests.
This means, if we change the cost analysis in a slight way that results in some constant cost increase under 200, we wouldn't able to detect it. I find this unsatisfactory and somewhat hacky.
This diff adds the ability to write the result of `costs-report.json` into a separate `cost-issues.exp` and then compare the actual costs (not only than relying on this arbitrary threshold reporting mechanism).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21816312
fbshipit-source-id: 93b531928
Sungkeun Cho
Ezgi Çiçek