Summary: Adding to the Quandary tests, the list of tests that are already working for the bi-abduction based taint analysis.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5395734
fbshipit-source-id: c4f2e79
Summary:
:
because otherwise people would believe they can use the internal representation of these std lib but it fails for our models.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D5368671
fbshipit-source-id: 4e53d5a
Summary:
:
Get rid of model location in reports.
The goal is to avoid changing `issues.exp` whenever a model is updated.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D5356608
fbshipit-source-id: 88ecaba
Summary:
Indexing into a string literal expression would generate a fresh
variable on every application of a transformer. This violated
finiteness of the domain, and caused divergence.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D5342951
fbshipit-source-id: e95e84e
Summary:
It instantiates fields of structures when a pointer to which is given
as a function parameter, e.g., `foo(&s);`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, jvillard
Differential Revision: D5337645
fbshipit-source-id: c06da29
Summary:
We keep track of both `beginPtr` and `endPtr` but the modelling was mostly
about `beginPtr` as some sort of approximation I guess. This shouldn't change
much but will be useful later when doing more iterator stuff.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5255772
fbshipit-source-id: 0f6e3e8
Summary: This seems to move in the right direction. Also, `const operator[]` did not do an `access_at`, which I fixed.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5320427
fbshipit-source-id: c31c5ea
Summary: Unknown library returns the unknown pointer as well as the top interval.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, jvillard
Differential Revision: D5282669
fbshipit-source-id: 34c7e18
Summary:
This diff tries to achieve the followings: if we have the following C++ codes:
```
bool foo(int x, int y) {
return &x == &y;
}
```
We want the C++ frontend to emit Sil as if the input is written as
```
bool foo(int x, int y) {
if (&x == &y) return 1; else return 0;
}
```
This matches the behavior of our Java frontend.
The reason why we prefer an explicit branch is that it will force the backend to eagerly produce two different specs for `foo`. Without the explicit branch, for the above example the backend would produce one spec with `return = (&x == &y)` as the post condition, which is not ideal because (1) we don't want local variables to escape to the function summary, and (2) with the knowledge that no two local variables may alias each other, the backend could actually determines that `&x == &y` is always false, emitting a more precise postcondition `return = 0`. This is not possible if we do not eagerly resolve the comparison expression.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D5260745
fbshipit-source-id: 6bbbf99
Summary:
:
There are throw wrapper functions like `std::__throw_bad_alloc()` defined in both libstdc++ (https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/functexcept.h) and libc++ (e.g. 907c1196a7/include/new (L145)). Folly actually exports some of them as well (diffusion/FBS/browse/master/fbcode/folly/portability/BitsFunctexcept.h). The function body of those wrappers merely throws the corresponding exception. My understanding is that the primary purpose of the wrappers is to throw the exception if everything goes well and to fall back to something reasonable when exception is disabled (e.g. when `-fno-exceptions` is passed to the compiler).
The problem is that infer doesn't really understand what those functions do, and I've seen some false positives get reported as a result of it. So to remove those FPs we need to either model them or handle them specially. Modeling those wrappers by either whitelisting them or overriding the include files turns out to be difficult, as those wrappers are only declared but not defined in the STL headers. Their implementations are not available to Infer so whitelisting them does nothing, and if I provide custom implementations in the headers then normal compilation process will be disrupted because the linker would complain about duplicated implementation.
What I did here is to replace functions whose name matches one of the throw wrapper's name with a `BuiltinDecls.exit`. I have to admit that this is a bit hacky: initially I was trying to do something more general: replacing functions with `noreturn` attribute with `BuitinDecls.exit`. That did not work because, CMIIW, the current frontend only exports function attributes for functions with actual bodies, not declaration-only functions. I'd love to be informed if there are better ways to handle those wrappers.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5266030
fbshipit-source-id: 4580227
Summary: We had a model for `Pools.SimplePool`, but were missing models for `Pools.Pool`. Since `SimplePool` and `SynchronizedPool` both extend `Pool`, modeling it should cover all of the cases.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D5236280
fbshipit-source-id: 9bbdb25
azhdar
Dulma Churchill
Jeremy Dubreil
Jia Chen
Mehdi Bouaziz
Josh Berdine
Kihong Heo
Daiva Naudziuniene
Sungkeun Cho
Jules Villard
Dino Distefano
Kyriakos Nikolaos Gkorogiannis
Sam Blackshear