Summary:
This is unsound but will help the analysis to report less false alarms with the common pattern:
if (a.get() != null) {
a.get().foo();
}
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5528227
fbshipit-source-id: 750db4a
Summary: This was reusing the side effects of the `add_constraints_on_retval` for the final purpose of being angelic and just assigning a fresh value to the lhs of the load.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5507037
fbshipit-source-id: ec1c89c
Summary:
Works the same way as read/write races on fields, except that are more relaxed (er, unsound) in deciding whether two containers may alias.
This is needed to avoid reporting a ton of FP's; full explanation in comments.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D5493404
fbshipit-source-id: 0a5d8b1
Summary:
The way we represented container writes before was pretty hacky: just use a dummy field for the name of the method that performs the container write.
This diff introduces a new access kind for container writes that is much more structured.
This will make it easier to soundly handle aliasing between containers and support container reads in the near future.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D5465747
fbshipit-source-id: e021ec2
Summary: Using a dedicated abstract domain, like Quandary does, is more suitable for taint analysis.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5473794
fbshipit-source-id: c917417
Summary: We get the wrong answer on most of them for now, but that is expected
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D5429242
fbshipit-source-id: 4899079
Summary:
This just makes the warnings silent for now. We may improve the analysis to check if the null check on the captured fields are consistent with the annotation on the corresponding parameters.
Eradicate also has the same issue. I added a test to outline this. The biabduction analysis will also probably fail on the same of annotation lookup. We may want implement the proper fix at the level of `Annotation.field_has_annot`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5419243
fbshipit-source-id: 6460de8
Summary: Adding to the Quandary tests, the list of tests that are already working for the bi-abduction based taint analysis.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5395734
fbshipit-source-id: c4f2e79
Summary: We had a model for `Pools.SimplePool`, but were missing models for `Pools.Pool`. Since `SimplePool` and `SynchronizedPool` both extend `Pool`, modeling it should cover all of the cases.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D5236280
fbshipit-source-id: 9bbdb25
Summary:
:
No longer use deprecated reporting function for the suggest nullable checker
Depends on D5205009
Reviewed By: grievejia
Differential Revision: D5205843
fbshipit-source-id: f6dd059
Summary:
Read/write race errors should always show one trace for a read and one trace for a write.
We forget to pass the conflicting writes to the reporting function in one case, which prevented us from showing a well-formed trace.
Fixed it by making the `conflicts` parameter non-optional
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5209332
fbshipit-source-id: 05da01a
Summary: We were almost always using `~report_reachable:true`, and in the cases where we weren't it is fine to do so. In general, a sink could read any state from its parameters, so it makes sense to complain if anything reachable from them is tainted.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5169067
fbshipit-source-id: ea7d659
Summary:
For now, we just support clearing the taint on a return value.
Ideally, we would associate a kind with the sanitizer and only clear taint that matches that kind.
However, it's fairly complicated to make that work properly with footprint sources.
I have some ideas about how to do it with passthroughs instead, but let's just do the simple thing for now.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5141906
fbshipit-source-id: a5b8b5e
Summary: Using Conjunction for thread join has known false negatives. Finer grained recording of threading information fixes this.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5111161
fbshipit-source-id: aab483c
Summary: This fixes a couple of false positives as objects of BufferedReader don't need to be closed if the wrapped reader resource gets closed correctly.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5106596
fbshipit-source-id: 725fb80
Summary: Useful to have Eradicate and Biabduction agree on how to inform that the analysis that some objects are not null.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5075127
fbshipit-source-id: 9e56981
Summary:
First step to be able to enable and disable the checkers to run in the following form:
> infer -a checkers --checker1 --checker2 --checker3 -- ...
and have a predefined list of checkers that are run by default with:
> infer -a checkers -- ...
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5007377
fbshipit-source-id: d7339ef
Summary:
Before we understood ownership, we needed this to avoid a mountain of Builder-related FP's.
Now that we have fairly sophisticated understanding of ownership, we can kill this hack.
Reviewed By: jaegs
Differential Revision: D4940238
fbshipit-source-id: 8d86e57
Summary: The purpose of the annotation reachability analysis is to report when a method annotated with `X` never calls, directly or indirectly, another method annotated with `Y`. However, there can be different call stacks following different execution paths from `X` to `Y`. Reporting more than one call stack ending with the same annotated procedure does not bring more signal to the end user. So the purpose of this diff is to avoid those duplicated reports and report at most one annotation reachability issue per end of call stack.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4942765
fbshipit-source-id: 46325a7
Jeremy Dubreil
Sam Blackshear
azhdar
Kyriakos Nikolaos Gkorogiannis
Jia Chen
Peter O'Hearn
Jules Villard