Summary:
By some unfortunate logic, OCaml often decides to use
`sexp_list`/`sexp_option` instead of just `list`/`option`. Sometimes
these get copy/pasted in interface files.
It would be good to tell OCaml not to do that in the first place but in
the meantime: this diff.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17907938
fbshipit-source-id: 7546834a2
Summary: The analysis is not intra-procedural, hence we don't really read the payload. Let's remove it.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17603911
fbshipit-source-id: c92b5c602
Summary:
Introduce a new experimental checker (`--impurity`) that detects
impurity information, tracking which parameters and global variables
of a function are modified. The checker relies on Pulse to detect how
the state changes: it traverses the pre and post pairs starting from
the parameter/global variable and finds where the pre and post heaps
diverge. At diversion points, we expect to see WrittenTo/Invalid attributes
containing a trace of how the address was modified. We use these to
construct the trace of impurity.
This checker is a complement to the purity checker that exists mainly
for Java (and used for cost and loop-hoisting analyses). The aim of
this new experimental checker is to rely on Pulse's precise
memory treatment and come up with a more precise im(purity)
analysis. To distinguish the two checkers, we introduce a new issue
type `IMPURE_FUNCTION` that reports when a function is impure, rather
than when it is pure (as in the purity checker).
TODO:
- improve the analysis to rely on impurity information of external
library calls. Currently, all library calls are assumed to be nops,
hence pure.
- de-entangle Pulse reporting from analysis.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17051567
fbshipit-source-id: 5e10afb4f
Jules Villard
Ezgi Çiçek