Summary:
The explicit marker for nondeterministic states was used to speed up the
shallow implementations of Topl, which ar enow removed.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D27297019
fbshipit-source-id: 0fce93817
Summary:
Before this diff, TOPL had 3 implementations:
1. a post-processing of biabduction summaries
2. a post-processing of pulse summaries
3. a deep embedding in pulse
1 and 2 additionally require instrumenting SIL to generate monitors for
the TOPL properties. 3 is faster than both 1 and 2, by a good lot, and
doesn't require instrumenting the SIL code. Thus, delete 1 and 2!
Also harmonise the CLI so that TOPL is activated by --topl, which
actives it as a checker, like other analyses.
Reviewed By: rgrig
Differential Revision: D27270178
fbshipit-source-id: e86cf972b
Summary:
A "large step" is a call, and it is "trivial" if it does not affect the
automaton state; i.e., if it is irrelevant to the property being
tracked.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25209670
fbshipit-source-id: bf3e594b3
Summary:
PulseTopl.large_step is now implemented
All active tests are migrated now to topl-in-pulse.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25179556
fbshipit-source-id: dc1136bab
Summary:
Report errors found by running Topl on top of Pulse, when using
--topl-pulse. Topl tests now run on top of Pulse.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23030771
fbshipit-source-id: 8770c2902
Summary:
The old --topl-only is now --topl-biabd-only, and there's also
--topl-pulse-only. This is WIP: the latter runs pulse, but it doesn't yet
extract Topl errors from pulse summaries. (The citv part of pulse path
conditions appears to have the necessary information.)
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22815250
fbshipit-source-id: a01792945
Summary:
This seems to make sense as it's a separate analysis (that depends on
biabduction). This introduces unpleasant `|| is_checker_enabled TOPL`
whenever we try to figure out if biabduction will run. I think this is a
more general problem that deserves a more general solution to express
the fact that checkers can depend on others, so that, eg,
`is_checker_enabled Purity` is true when we pass `--loop-hoisting`. Will
address in another diff.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21618460
fbshipit-source-id: 8b0c9a015
Summary:
This is the kind of property for which the previous syntax forced one to
use spurious registers.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D20118863
fbshipit-source-id: b49740d33
Radu Grigore
Jules Villard