Summary:
It's ok to take an address of a field / array access of an invalid object.
This diff calculates the inner most dereference for an access expression starting with `&` and does not report on the dereference even if the address is invalid.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13450758
fbshipit-source-id: 18c038701
Summary:
When we create Dereference edge, we also create TakeAddress back edge. This causes false positives for stack variables. When we write to a stack variable and then take its address, the resulting address is the one from the back edge of the written value. See example `push_back_value_ok`. To solve this issue, this diff changes stack to denote a map from address of variables rather than from variables.
We still have issue for fields, see example, FP_push_back_value_field_ok. To solve this, we probably need to remove back edges.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13432415
fbshipit-source-id: 9254a1a6d
Summary:
When a lambda gets created, record the abstract addresses it captures, then
complain if we see some of them be invalidated before it is called.
Add a notion of "allocator" for reporting better messages. The messages are
still a bit sucky, will need to improve them more generally at some point.
```
jul lambda ~ infer 1 infer -g --pulse-only -- clang -std=c++11 -c infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp
Logs in /home/jul/infer.fb/infer-out/logs
Capturing in make/cc mode...
Found 1 source file to analyze in /home/jul/infer.fb/infer-out
Found 2 issues
infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp:21: error: USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR
`&(f)` accesses address `s` captured by `&(f)` as `s` invalidated by destructor call `S_~S(s)` at line 20, column 3 past its lifetime (debug: 5).
19. f = [&s] { return s.f; };
20. } // destructor for s called here
21. > return f(); // s used here
22. }
23.
infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp:30: error: USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR
`&(f)` accesses address `s` captured by `&(f)` as `s` invalidated by destructor call `S_~S(s)` at line 29, column 3 past its lifetime (debug: 8).
28. f = [&] { return s.f; };
29. }
30. > return f();
31. }
32.
Summary of the reports
USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR: 2
```
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13400074
fbshipit-source-id: 3c68ff4ea
Summary: Model more `std::vector` functions that can potentially invalidate references to vector's elements (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13399161
fbshipit-source-id: 95cf2cae6
Summary:
Some code calls `this->~Obj()` then proceeds to use fields in the current
object, which previously we would report as invalid uses. Assume people know
what they are doing and ignore destructor calls to `this`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13401145
fbshipit-source-id: f6b0fb6ec
Summary: It weakly updates array when there are more than two contents.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13318443
fbshipit-source-id: fa740d8b1
Summary:
It materializes symbolic values of function parameters on-demand. The on-demand materialization is triggered when finding a value from an abstract memory and joining/widening abstract memories.
Depends on D13294630
Main idea:
* Symbolic values are on-demand-ly generated by a symbol path and its type
* In order to avoid infinite generation of symbolic values, symbol paths are canonicalized by structure types and field names (which means they are abstracted to the same value). For example, in a linked list, a symbolic value `x->next->next` is canonicalized to `x->next` when the structures (`*x` and `*x->next`) have the same structure type and the same field name (`next`).
Changes from the previous code:
* `Symbol.t` does not include `id` and `pname` for distinguishing symbols. Now, all symbols are compared by `path:SymbolPath.partial` and `bound_end`.
* `SymbolTable` is no longer used, which was used for generating symbolic values with new `id`s.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13294635
fbshipit-source-id: fa422f084
Summary:
`eval_locs` is like `eval |> get_all_locs` but avoids computing things that aren't necessary.
The goal was not to be an optimization but is needed for Java where array blocks don't have offsets.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D13190939
fbshipit-source-id: 1cc0e6338
Summary: Similarly as `std::vector::push_back`, `std::vector::reserve` can invalidate the references to elements if the new size is bigger than the existing one. More info on `std::vector::reserve`: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector/reserve
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13340324
fbshipit-source-id: bf99b6923
Summary: Instead of variable having the value of a single location on stack, we now allow variables to have multiple locations. Consequently, we also allow a memory location to point to a set of locations in the heap. We enforce a limit on a maximum number of locations in a set (currently 5).
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13190876
fbshipit-source-id: 5cb5ba9a6
Summary:
At function calls, it copies callee's values that are reachable from parameters.
Depends on D13231291
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13231711
fbshipit-source-id: 1e8aed1c4
Summary: It instantiates not only symbols for bound but also symbols for locations at function calls.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13231291
fbshipit-source-id: ce23a943b
Summary: Recent improvements in join fixed `FP_allocate_in_branch_ok` because the variable was not read after the join.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13233441
fbshipit-source-id: 89b701e12
Summary: Delete function that would get a linter warning or not depending on the version of Xcode.
Reviewed By: martintrojer
Differential Revision: D13215750
fbshipit-source-id: 886ce397d
Summary:
It's useful for checkers to know when variables go out of scope to
perform garbage collection in their domains, especially for complex
domains with non-trivial joins. This makes the analyses more precise at
little cost.
This could have been added as a custom function call to a builtin, but I
decided against it because this instruction doesn't have the semantics
of any function call. It's better for each checker to explicitly not
deal with the custom instruction instead.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D13102951
fbshipit-source-id: 33be22fab
Sungkeun Cho
Nikos Gorogiannis
Ezgi Çiçek
Mehdi Bouaziz
Daiva Naudziuniene
Fabio Milano
Jules Villard
David Lively
Jeremy Dubreil
Ted Reed