Summary: We only care about expensive invariant calls. Let's disable the usual one since it is not used and there is no point filling up our dbs.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D18298530
fbshipit-source-id: 7a933c8da
Summary:
Describe what the --report-*-* options actually do instead of their
outdated documentation from the time where this was
`--checkers-blacklist-regex`, `--infer-blacklist-regex` and the like.
Reviewed By: dulmarod, mityal
Differential Revision: D17906015
fbshipit-source-id: 204349e9e
Summary:
The documentation and uses of filtering disagree. One typical usage is deduplication.
Split that where obvious, add comments where not obvious, and leave alone when obviously unrelated to deduplication.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17715329
fbshipit-source-id: ec757927b
Summary:
Introduce a new experimental checker (`--impurity`) that detects
impurity information, tracking which parameters and global variables
of a function are modified. The checker relies on Pulse to detect how
the state changes: it traverses the pre and post pairs starting from
the parameter/global variable and finds where the pre and post heaps
diverge. At diversion points, we expect to see WrittenTo/Invalid attributes
containing a trace of how the address was modified. We use these to
construct the trace of impurity.
This checker is a complement to the purity checker that exists mainly
for Java (and used for cost and loop-hoisting analyses). The aim of
this new experimental checker is to rely on Pulse's precise
memory treatment and come up with a more precise im(purity)
analysis. To distinguish the two checkers, we introduce a new issue
type `IMPURE_FUNCTION` that reports when a function is impure, rather
than when it is pure (as in the purity checker).
TODO:
- improve the analysis to rely on impurity information of external
library calls. Currently, all library calls are assumed to be nops,
hence pure.
- de-entangle Pulse reporting from analysis.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17051567
fbshipit-source-id: 5e10afb4f
Summary:
This check was an incomplete attempt to make nullsafe check nutritious
annotations for fields that get modified.
This was never fully productionized, and this check is turned off by
default.
In near future, we don't anticipate supporting this feature, so let's
remove it to simplify the code.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17282015
fbshipit-source-id: d63a2f1f7
Summary: Use_after_free was used both for biabduction and pulse, and the biabduction version is blacklisted by default. As a result, the Pulse version was also disabled unintentionally. This changes the name of the old use_after_free so that now we can get use_after_free bugs whenever pulse is enabled.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17182687
fbshipit-source-id: 539ca69de
Summary:
`Present` annotation was an experiment made many years ago that never
got into real usage. The idea was to annotate Optional<> types with
Present, which means that it is safe to call get().
We don't plan to support `Present` annotation for optional types in the
near future.
Support of `Present` annotation requires extra levels of abstraction
that make the changing the behavior and introducing new features harder.
A lot of checks for nullability are written in generic way so they also
check for presense.
Getting rid of that will allow us to simplify our
work for introducing new semantics for nullsafe.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17153432
fbshipit-source-id: c5ea9bdf1
Summary:
I found it very confusing that running infer with --debug makes the
report to be different.
Intuitively, I expect (and I think majority of users would expect) that
`--debug` makes things more verbose (and potentially more slow / consuming
more memory and disk space), but does not change anything apart from it.
One pro of preserving existing behavior, pointed by jvillard:
- Suppose some check is experimental or disabled in the config. The
users expect the issue to be found, but it does not show up. They run
`infer --debug` to understand the behavior, and suddenly the issue shows
up.
I, hovewer, find this pro not important enough and potentially confusing
the users even more.
(If they want to investigate seriously, they can always use
--no-filtering, and there are a lot of cases when the issue does not
show up for others, much hard to undertand reasons, than the fact that
it is disabled).
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17113750
fbshipit-source-id: 46cc93503
Summary:
The default values of config options can sometimes depend on build-time
configuration values. This makes checking that the manuals "remain the same"
trickier as the manuals can be different depending on the platform. This
removes *all* default values from the checked-in manuals. We could be more
fine-grained and scrub only the values that are susceptible to change but for
now this is probably good enough.
This is done by implementing new options `--help-scrubbed` and
`--help-scrubbed-full` and using these in our tests instead of `--help` and
`--help-full` (which remain unaffected).
Also don't wrap the default values in `$(i,...)` anymore because the defaults
can trigger line breaks and then the man page is ill-formatted because that
format is stupid.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D16543779
fbshipit-source-id: bc929ff8c
Summary:
- Add allocation costs to `costs-report.json` and enable diffing over allocation costs.
- Also, let's be more consistent and modular in naming our cost issues.
- introduce a generic issue type `X_TIME_COMPLEXITY_INCREASE` where `X` can be one of the cost kinds. If the function is on the cold start, issue can have the `COLD_START` suffix. Similarly for infinite/zero/expensive calls.
- Change `PERFORMANCE_VARIATION` -> `EXECUTION_TIME_COMPLEXITY_INCREASE`
- Add new issue type for `ALLOCATION_COMPLEXITY_INCREASE_COLD_START` which will be enabled by default
- Refactor cost issues to be more modular and succinct. This also makes addition of a new cost kind very easy by adding the kind into the `enabled_cost_kinds` list in `CostKind.ml`
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D15822681
fbshipit-source-id: cf89ece59
Summary:
This is a simple checker that identifies inefficient uses of `keySet` iterator where (not only the key but also) the value is accessed via `get(key)`. It is more efficient to use `entrySet` iterator which already returns both key-value pairs. This optimization would get rid of many extra lookups which can be expensive.
We simply traverse the CFG starting from the loop head upwards and pick up the map that is iterated over. Then, we check in the loop nodes if there is a call to `get(...)` over this map. If, so we report.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D15737779
fbshipit-source-id: 702465b4e
Summary: Previously there was no way of getting that list from the manual.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D15158598
fbshipit-source-id: 1705ed59d
Summary:
Keep `--analyzer` around for now for integrations that depend on it.
Also deprecate the `--infer-blacklist-path-regex`,
`--checkers-blacklist-path-regex`, etc. in favour of
`--report-blacklist-path-regex` which more accurately represents what these do
as of now.
Rely on the current subcommand instead of the analyzer where needed, as most of
the code already does.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9942809
fbshipit-source-id: 9380e6036
Summary:
This allows infer devs to see the effects their changes have on the infer manuals.
Check in the manuals for each subcommand + the output of `--help-full` to get a
complete picture. If this is too annoying we can also check in only
`--help-full`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9916404
fbshipit-source-id: b981e2c33
Ezgi Çiçek
Jules Villard
Nikos Gorogiannis
Mitya Lyubarskiy
Dulma Churchill
Radu Grigore
Dino Distefano
Jeremy Dubreil
Sungkeun Cho