Summary: The debug HTML for Quandary/thread-safety was still printing the SIL instructions, which is not very helpful. Print the HIL instructions instead.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5112696
fbshipit-source-id: a0aa925
Summary: String are very important for taint analysis, have to make sure that we have the right models/the right behaviors for unknown code.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D5054832
fbshipit-source-id: 7e7ee07
Summary: In particular, the heuristics for propagating taint via unknown code needs to be aware of the frontend's trick of introducing dummy return variables.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5046345
fbshipit-source-id: da87665
Summary:
There are two pointer-related operations you can do in C++ but not Java that we need to support in taint analysis:
(1) `*formal_ptr = ...` when `formal_ptr` is a formal that's a pointer type. Java doesn't have raw pointers, so we didn't need to handle this case.
(2) Passing by reference, which Java also doesn't have (everything is pass-by-value).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5041246
fbshipit-source-id: 4e8f962
Summary: A lot of C++ library functions look like this, so it's important to have.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5026082
fbshipit-source-id: 6f421b6
Summary: Stops Quandary errors from getting dropped on the floor when it runs alongside the other checkers.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5010801
fbshipit-source-id: 2847f61
Summary:
Needed because this is how the Clang frontend translates returns of non-POD, non pointer values (I think)?
Will handle the more general case of pass by reference soon.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D5017653
fbshipit-source-id: 1fbcea5
Summary:
Last step for converting thread-safety and quandary to HIL.
Push the logic for managing the id map and converting the instructions into a functor.
This way, client analyses can simply write HIL transfer functions and call the functor.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D4989987
fbshipit-source-id: 485169e
Summary: Sawja assigns them on multiple control-flow paths, so they're not SSA.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4896745
fbshipit-source-id: c805216
Summary:
Limit the use of `SourceFile.invalid` (renamed from `SourceFile.empty`) as much
as possible. In particular, do not generate bogus procnames for external global
variables: their translation unit was set to the invalid source file, now we
distinguish between extern/non-extern global variables more explicitly.
`SourceFile.invalid` is still used in too many places to actually remove it, often as a dummy initial value that never gets used, but sometimes as an actual value... Worse, we cannot fail on all operations on `SourceFile.Invalid` yet: the `SourceFile.to_string` method is used in too many places where it could get `SourceFile.Invalid` as argument. It's easy to see where it's used by making it raise in the code, then running the tests. This results in spaghetti backtraces that are hard to trace back to a root cause.
Reviewed By: akotulski, jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4860019
fbshipit-source-id: 45be040
Summary:
If we couldn't project the callee access path into the caller during summary application, we still added the corresponding trace to the caller state.
This was wasteful; it just bloats the caller with state it will never look at.
Fixed it by making `get_caller_ap_node` return `None` when the state won't be visible in the caller.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4727937
fbshipit-source-id: 87665e9
Summary:
This is step further simplify the code to avoid cases where the summary of the procedure being analyzed can exist in two different versions:
# one version is the summary passed as parameter to every checker
# the other is a copy of the summary in the in-memory specs table
This diff implements:
# the analysis always run through the `Ondemand` module (was already the case before)
# the summary of the procedure being analyzed is created at the beginning of the on-demand analysis call
# all the checkers run in sequence, update their respective part of the payload and log errors to the error table
# the summary is store at the end of the on-demand analysis call
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4787414
fbshipit-source-id: 2d115c9
Summary:
Changes every checker to take a summary as parameter and return the updated summary to the next checker. Since several operations, like `Reporting.log_*` are modifying the summary in memory by loading them from the in-memory cache of summaries, we currently need to rely on `Specs.get_summary_unsafe` to return the updated version of the summary.
This diff allows to change the API of `Reporting` to take a summary as input and progressively remove all the calls `Specs.get_summary_unsafe` independently from adding the possibility to run several checkers at the same time. The final objective to have every checker just passing around the summary of the procedure being analyzed, and having the in-memory cache only use to store the summaries of the callees.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4649252
fbshipit-source-id: 98f7ca7
Summary:
There was a bug where we allowed ourselves to project local variables from the callee summary into an access path in the caller.
We should only be able to project callee variables that are in the footprint.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4684868
fbshipit-source-id: 53a2b9d
Summary: In some cases where a function is called directly on a formal (e.g, `def foo(o) { callSomething(o) }`, we were failing to propagate the footprint trace to the caller.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4502404
fbshipit-source-id: d4d632f
Summary:
At one point I thought we'd want to have lots of different schedulers for things like exploring loops in different orders, but that hasn't materialized.
Let's make the common use-case simpler by hiding the `Scheduler` parameter inside the `AbstractInterpreter` module.
We can always expose `MakeWithScheduler` later if we want to.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D4508095
fbshipit-source-id: 726e051
Summary:
When the receiver type and return type of an unknown call are the same, propagate taint to both the receiver and the return type.
This does the right thing for common "builder-style" methods that both update and return the receiver.
We already had custom models for a few such methods (e.g., `StringBuilder.append`), but we can remove them now.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4490071
fbshipit-source-id: 325ea88
Summary: This will be useful in upcoming changes to the thread-safety analysis as well.
Reviewed By: dkgi
Differential Revision: D4402146
fbshipit-source-id: c750127
Summary:
A domain should not definite its initial state, since distinct users of the domain may want to choose different initial values.
For example, one user might want to bind all of the formals to some special values, and one user might want the initial domain to be an empty map
This diff makes this distinction clear in the types by (a) requiring the initial state to be passed to the abstract interpreter and (b) lifting the requirement that abstract domains define `initial`.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D4359629
fbshipit-source-id: cbcee28
Summary: This more easily allow to switch between the different modes for handeling dynamic dispatch
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4367556
fbshipit-source-id: 795d2c4
Summary:
We currently can only model the return values of functions as sources.
In order to model inputs of endpoints as sources, we need the capability to treat the formals of certain functions as sources too.
This diff adds that capability by adding a function for getting the tainted sources to the source module, then using that info in the analysis.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4314738
fbshipit-source-id: dd7d423
Sam Blackshear
Andrzej Kotulski
Jules Villard
Jeremy Dubreil
Martino Luca
Cristiano Calcagno