Summary:
This confuses the SIOF checker and causes false positives. This dummy deref is
generated for constructors of classes that are modeled as being pointer types
instead of the actual class in infer, typically for smart pointers. I do not
understand how this works.
The biabduction also analyses this code, so might now get confused itself.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D6221817
fbshipit-source-id: 050c5a9
Summary:
Inject a marker using a global variable in <iostream>, and whitelist it so that
the frontend translates it.
Use the marker in the SIOF checker to tell whether a file includes <iostream>.
If so, start the analysis of its methods assuming that the standard streams are
initialised.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5941343
fbshipit-source-id: 3388d55
Summary:
The previous domain for SIOF was duplicating some work with the generic Trace
domain, and basically was a bit confused and confusing. A sink was a set of
global accesses, and a state contains a set of sinks. Then the checker has to
needlessly jump through hoops to normalize this set of sets of accesses into a
set of accesses.
The new domain has one sink = one access, as suggested by sblackshear. This simplifies
a few things, and makes the dedup logic much easier: just grab the first report
of the list of reports for a function.
We only report on the fake procedures generated to initialise a global, and the
filtering means that we keep only one report per global.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5932138
fbshipit-source-id: acb7285
Summary:
As an interprocedural checker, SIOF should not run unless explicitly required.
Make it a new type of analyzer like other similar checkers.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D4937820
fbshipit-source-id: a9e2d38
Jules Villard