Summary:
Improve the error messages, change is more or less documented in the
code.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D15374334
fbshipit-source-id: f1dd54180
Summary:
Before: the trace would explain how a value was invalidated and
accessed, but not how the value that was invalidated had been
constructed.
Now: `PulseTrace.t` records breadcrumbs of how the value was constructed
in addition to the interproc "action" trace leading to the invalidation
or access action.
Concretely:
```
void bad(X &x) {
X *y = x;
X *z = x;
delete y;
access(z);
}
```
will produce the trace:
Invalidation part:
y = x
delete y
Access part:
z = x
access(z)
access to z->f inside of access(z)
Before this diff the "Access part" would be missing the "z = x" part of
the trace, so it might be confusing why `z` has anything to do with `y`.
However, such "breadcrumbs" are not recorded in the inter-procedural
part, only the sequence of calls is. This is a trade-off for simplicity,
maybe it's enough for developers maybe it isn't, we'll find out later.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D15354438
fbshipit-source-id: 8d0aed717
Summary:
In preparation for the next diff that re-uses `PulseTrace.t` for a type
that combines breadcrumbs + action.
No change intended.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, jberdine
Differential Revision: D15354437
fbshipit-source-id: cbb8757b4
Summary:
Feedback from peterogithub:
- mention which access path is being invalidated and accessed in the message
- mention the line at which it was invalidated (the line at which it's accessed is already the line at which we report)
- traces for stack variable/C++ temporary address escapes
- delete double implementation of the same functionality in
`PulseTrace`: `location_of_action_start` is the same as
`outer_location_of_action`...
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14800294
fbshipit-source-id: 3d9ab9b3d
Summary:
Similarly to function parameters (and the return value), we need to
apply the pre/post of a function call to the globals mentioned in its
summary.
- tigthen summaries further to remember only abducible variables in the
post (as well as in the pre)
- take globals into account when applying pre/post pairs
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14780800
fbshipit-source-id: fc0d180bb
Summary:
The heuristic to detect variables going out of scope was to detect any
access expression passed as argument to an injected destructor call.
However destructor calls are also injected in destructor bodies to
destruct each field of an object, so the heuristic would detect fields
going out of scope, which, erm, doesn't make sense. Limit the heuristic
to local program variables.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14771454
fbshipit-source-id: ffa3c9fe3
Summary:
Only throw values to the pre if they can be followed from "abducible"
variables: formals of the current method and globals.
Because figuring out if a `Pvar.t` is a formal of the current procedure
is actually a giant pain, hack something not too bad instead:
pre-register all formals at the start of the analysis of the
procedure. Then the only other variables we care about in the
precondition are globals, which we can detect easily.
This is mostly an optimisation (summaries won't include irrelevant
"abduced" facts about the procedure's local variables anymore), but it
also fixes a bug where we would sometimes overwrite things in the pre. I
think that's why the tests improved.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14753493
fbshipit-source-id: 08e73637f
Summary:
This is useful for the model of `exit` that returns 0 disjuncts. All
other models return 1 disjunct for now, but in the future things like
`malloc()` will need to return 2 possible states for instance.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14753491
fbshipit-source-id: 3e7387d6d
Summary:
This mostly doesn't make sense. The only thing this would have been good
for was to give the most accurate result on access paths such as
`*(&(x.f))`, but these are normalised anyway (into `x.f`) so we actually
never see these. That said there might be some use to some similar logic
in the future, but in the meantime let's delete the current feature as
it wasn't thought through.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14753492
fbshipit-source-id: 597cec027
Summary:
The previous message formatting had regressed and produced non-sensical messages.
More importantly, remove template parameters from error messages to
trigger the heuristic in `InferPrint` that deduplicates errors that are
on the same line with the same error type and message. Without this we
get hundreds of reports that correspond to as many instantiations of the
same code.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14747979
fbshipit-source-id: 3c4aad2b1
Summary:
We see the magic function `__variable_initialization` at the point where
the variable is declared, eg `int x = foo()`. It's safe to reset `&x` at
that point. This circumvents an issue that pops up in some rare cases
where the ternary conditional operator `?:` and variable initialization
conspire to produce weird frontend results.
Some test becomes a FN again, but I think it was being reported for the
wrong reasons; will investigate more later.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14747980
fbshipit-source-id: e75d6e30f
Summary:
Useful to know which disjunct is being executed. Reprinting them
wholesale is too spammy so compromise by outputting just enough to be
able to reconstruct the info "which disjunct was executed and which new
disjuncts were produced?".
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14753495
fbshipit-source-id: f5aa68160
Summary:
This isn't needed now that this information is recorded in
`PulseTrace.action` instead.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14645089
fbshipit-source-id: 9c3f38722
Summary:
This ensures that each attribute type can only be present once per
address. Makes ~80x time improvement on pathological cases such as
Duff's device.
This introduces a new kind of Set in `PrettyPrintable`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14645091
fbshipit-source-id: c7f9b760c
Summary:
Detect when a variable goes out of scope. When that's the case, mark its
address *and* its contents as invalid.
Give subsequent uses a USE_AFTER_LIFETIME error type instead of
USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14387147
fbshipit-source-id: a2c530fda
Summary:
For each operation on the domain, try to record what it requires of the
precondition of the function. This is akin to what happens in the
biabduction backend, hence the terminology used.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14387148
fbshipit-source-id: a61fe30c8
Summary:
This is in preparation of interprocedural pulse. The abstract addresses
generator keeps a reference to create fresh addresses, but that's a
piece of global state that needs to persist across ondemand analyses.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14324760
fbshipit-source-id: 5cdb1d3f5
Summary:
Instead of emitting an ad-hoc builtin on variable declaration emit a new
metadata instruction. This allows us to remove the code matching on that
ad-hoc builtin that had to be inserted in several checkers.
Inferbo & pulse used that information meaningfully and had to undergo
some minor changes to cope with the new metada instruction.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14833100
fbshipit-source-id: 9b3009d22
Summary:
Bundle all non-semantic-bearing instructions into a `Metadata _`
instruction in SIL.
- On a documentation level this makes clearer the distinction between
instructions that encode the semantics of the program and those that are
just hints for the various backend analysis.
- This makes it easier to add more of these auxiliary instructions in
the future. For example, the next diff introduces a new `Skip` auxiliary
instruction to replace the hacky `ExitScope([], Location.dummy)`.
- It also makes it easier to surface all current and future such
auxiliary instructions to HIL as the datatype for these syntactic hints
can be shared between SIL and HIL. This diff brings `Nullify` and
`Abstract` to HIL for free.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14827674
fbshipit-source-id: f68fe2110
Summary:
Previously we would say that `lhs <= rhs` (or `lhs |- rhs`) when a
mapping existed between the abstract addresses of `lhs` and `rhs` such
that `mapping(lhs)` was a supergraph of `rhs`. In particular,
we had that `x |-> x' * x' |-> x'' |- x |-> x'`. This is not entirely
great, in particular once we get pairs of state representing footprint +
current state. I'm not sure I have an extremely compelling argument why
though, except that it's not the usual way we do implication in SL, but
there wasn't a compelling argument for the previous state of affairs
either.
This changes `|-` to be true only when `mapping(lhs) = rhs` (modulo only
considering the addresses reachable from the stack variables).
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14568272
fbshipit-source-id: 1bb83950e
Summary: It's all grown up now and taking quite some space in src/checkers/.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D14568273
fbshipit-source-id: b843c031e
Peter O'Hearn
Jules Villard
Mehdi Bouaziz