Summary:
Improve the error messages, change is more or less documented in the
code.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D15374334
fbshipit-source-id: f1dd54180
Summary:
Before: the trace would explain how a value was invalidated and
accessed, but not how the value that was invalidated had been
constructed.
Now: `PulseTrace.t` records breadcrumbs of how the value was constructed
in addition to the interproc "action" trace leading to the invalidation
or access action.
Concretely:
```
void bad(X &x) {
X *y = x;
X *z = x;
delete y;
access(z);
}
```
will produce the trace:
Invalidation part:
y = x
delete y
Access part:
z = x
access(z)
access to z->f inside of access(z)
Before this diff the "Access part" would be missing the "z = x" part of
the trace, so it might be confusing why `z` has anything to do with `y`.
However, such "breadcrumbs" are not recorded in the inter-procedural
part, only the sequence of calls is. This is a trade-off for simplicity,
maybe it's enough for developers maybe it isn't, we'll find out later.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D15354438
fbshipit-source-id: 8d0aed717
Summary:
Feedback from peterogithub:
- mention which access path is being invalidated and accessed in the message
- mention the line at which it was invalidated (the line at which it's accessed is already the line at which we report)
- traces for stack variable/C++ temporary address escapes
- delete double implementation of the same functionality in
`PulseTrace`: `location_of_action_start` is the same as
`outer_location_of_action`...
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14800294
fbshipit-source-id: 3d9ab9b3d
Summary:
This mostly doesn't make sense. The only thing this would have been good
for was to give the most accurate result on access paths such as
`*(&(x.f))`, but these are normalised anyway (into `x.f`) so we actually
never see these. That said there might be some use to some similar logic
in the future, but in the meantime let's delete the current feature as
it wasn't thought through.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14753492
fbshipit-source-id: 597cec027
Summary:
We see the magic function `__variable_initialization` at the point where
the variable is declared, eg `int x = foo()`. It's safe to reset `&x` at
that point. This circumvents an issue that pops up in some rare cases
where the ternary conditional operator `?:` and variable initialization
conspire to produce weird frontend results.
Some test becomes a FN again, but I think it was being reported for the
wrong reasons; will investigate more later.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D14747980
fbshipit-source-id: e75d6e30f
Summary:
This ensures that each attribute type can only be present once per
address. Makes ~80x time improvement on pathological cases such as
Duff's device.
This introduces a new kind of Set in `PrettyPrintable`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14645091
fbshipit-source-id: c7f9b760c
Summary:
For each operation on the domain, try to record what it requires of the
precondition of the function. This is akin to what happens in the
biabduction backend, hence the terminology used.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D14387148
fbshipit-source-id: a61fe30c8
Summary: It's all grown up now and taking quite some space in src/checkers/.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D14568273
fbshipit-source-id: b843c031e
Jules Villard