Summary:
Global variables and function names in LLAIR are constant and so do
not need to be handled like normal assignable or shadowable
variables. This diff does this by changing the translation from LLAIR
to FOL to map globals and functions to uninterpreted constants instead
of variables.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24886571
fbshipit-source-id: efb8c9f49
Summary:
Distinguish expressions that name globals from registers. This leads
to clearer code, and globals are semantically distinct from general
registers. In particular, they are constant, so any machinery for
handling assignment does not need to consider them. This diff only
adds the distinction to LLAIR, it is not pushed through to FOL, which
will come later.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24846676
fbshipit-source-id: 3aca025bf
Summary:
Distinguish expressions that name functions from registers. This leads
to clearer code, and function names are semantically distinct from
general registers. In particular, they are constant, so any machinery
for handling assignment does not need to consider them. Unlike general
globals, they never have initializer expressions, and in particular
not recursive initializers. This diff only adds the distinction to
LLAIR, it is not pushed through to FOL, which will come later.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24846672
fbshipit-source-id: 2101f353f
Summary:
LLVM and Llair use a form of records, in particular for values of
constant structs and arrays. In Llair, these use standard `select` and
`update` operations a la McCarthy's theory of functional arrays, with
a compact `record` operation for constructing complete records. This
is fine and logically well-understood. The issue is that once
constructed, these values are accessed using instructions that (may)
operate over byte-ranges, rather than struct member indices. The
backend uses a theory of sequences to represent such values (the
contents of memory). So some code depends on high fidelity
interoperation between these two views.
This diff resolves this by removing the record theory from the backend
and instead encoding them using the sequence theory. The approach
taken keeps records in Llair and translates them to sequences in
Llair_to_Fol. This choice is made since the encoding into the sequence
theory involves terms that do not have types that are expressible in
terms of the source types. In particular, `(update r i e)`, is encoded
as the concatenation of the prefix of `r` up to the offset of index
`i`, followed by `e` (possibly with padding), and then the suffix of
`r` from index `i+1` on. The prefix and suffix sequences do not
necessarily have source-expressible types.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24800866
fbshipit-source-id: e7238c558
Summary:
The support for recursive references to globals from within their
initializers is enough to handle all the cases of recursive structs
that have been encountered so far. Therefore this diff removes the
complication of recursive records entirely.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24772955
fbshipit-source-id: f59f06257
Summary:
Since floats of any width are interpreted the same (as exact rationals
where possible and uninterpreted constants otherwise), this does not
introduce additional infidelity.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D24746225
fbshipit-source-id: bc8e7bdb9
Summary:
Since non-integral address spaces are not currently supported anyhow,
this does not introduce additional infidelity.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D24746234
fbshipit-source-id: 1f6887a78
Summary: Just to make the source and destination types of the conversion more clear.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D24746239
fbshipit-source-id: 592c7d0f1
Summary:
Change the type of `fold` functions to enable them to compose
better. The guiding reasoning behind using types such as:
```
val fold : 'a t -> 's -> f:('a -> 's -> 's) -> 's
```
is:
1. The function argument should be labeled. This is so that it can be
reordered relative to the others, since it is often a multi-line
`fun` expression.
2. The function argument should come last. This enables its
arguments (which are often polymorphic) to benefit from type-based
disambiguation information determined by the types of the other
arguments at the call sites.
3. The function argument's type should produce an
accumulator-transformer when partially-applied. That is,
`f x : 's -> 's`. This composes well with other functions designed
to produce transformers/endofunctions when partially applied, and
in particular improves the common case of composing folds into
"state-passing style" code.
4. The fold function itself should produce an accumulator-transformer
when partially applied. So `'a t -> 's -> f:_ -> 's` rather than
`'s -> 'a t -> f:_ -> 's` or `'a t -> init:'s -> f:_ -> 's` etc.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306063
fbshipit-source-id: 13bd8bbee
Summary:
The changes in set_intf.ml dictate the rest. The previous API
minimized changes when changing the backing implementation. But that
API is hostile toward composition, partial application, and
state-passing style code.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306089
fbshipit-source-id: 00a09f486
Summary:
The treatment of comparison and exceptions in Core/Core_kernel/Base
makes them questionable as the default. This diff changes nonstdlib so
that Core is no longer opened in the global namespace, and makes a few
changes to handle the resulting minor API changes. This leads to a
lighter-touch nonstdlib, which makes a few definitions of its own, and
selects and extends modules from several libraries, including base,
core_kernel, containers, iter.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306090
fbshipit-source-id: 42c91bd1b
Summary:
Change the representation of Fol terms to use polynomials for
arithmetic. This is a generalization and simplification of those used
in Ses. In particular, the treatment of division is stronger as it
captures associativity, commutativity, and unit laws, plus being the
inverse of multiplication.
Also, the interface is staged and factored so that the implementation
of polynomials and arithmetic is separate from the rest of terms.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306108
fbshipit-source-id: 78589a8ec
Summary:
Clarify the translation of 1-bit integer operations to formulas, and
add a few missing cases.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D24306057
fbshipit-source-id: 626a27997
Summary:
The translation from Llair to Fol can now be implemented using only
the external interface of Fol, so move it to a separate module. This
makes Fol not depend on Llair and vice versa, as appropriate.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D24306087
fbshipit-source-id: fc68a588b
Josh Berdine