Summary: In ObjC, when a method is called on nil, there is no NPE, the method is actually not called and the return value is 0/false/nil. There is an exception in the case where the return type is non-POD. In that case it's UB and we want to report an error.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26815687
fbshipit-source-id: 8126414ab
Summary: We were missing a part of the trace if it was going through a nil summary as the invalidation was set in the nil summary. Instead of creating a fresh value for return in the nil summary {self=0}{return=0}, we return self {self=0}{return=self}. This way we keep all the information about invalidation in the trace.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26871098
fbshipit-source-id: 6eb175e68
Summary: When a method is called in ObjC on nil, there is no NPE, the method is actually not called and the return value is 0/false/nil. (There is an exception in the case where the return type is non-POD. In that case it's UB. This will be addressed later). To implement this behaviour we add additional summary to ObjC instance methods {self = 0} {return = 0}. We also want to make sure that inferred summary will not be used in we call a method on nil, hence, we add a path condition {self > 0} to get a contradiction when needed.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D26664187
fbshipit-source-id: cdac2a5bb
Summary: Added some basic examples for Objective-C we want to address next in pulse nullptr dereference analysis. In particular, we should not get a `nil` dereference error when we call a method on `nil`, except if the method returns a non-POD (Plain Old Data) type.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D26053402
fbshipit-source-id: 66f4600c3
Summary: We model internal builtin `__new` function to return a non-null value. This fixes nullptr_dereference false positives where we explicitly check the result of a function call for nullptr when the function returns a newly created object.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22772217
fbshipit-source-id: 37d209697
Summary: The new memory leaks analysis is now ready to be enabled by default and turned on in production. This also replaces the biabduction one which is now disabled.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21998666
fbshipit-source-id: 9cd95e894
Summary:
This function had been computing the name for ObjC methods wrong, with only the class name. This was causing wrong error messages in Pulse.
The main issue was that `Procname.to_simplified_string` was writing `Classname::methodname` for ObjC methods, which is not the convention. This confused the `hashable_name` funtion. So changing the method name to `Classname.methodname` which is more standard, and this also fixes `hashable_name`.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis, jvillard
Differential Revision: D21570880
fbshipit-source-id: 13ed62cf8
Summary:
Just like `CFBridgingRelease` we want to be able to model functions that are specific to a given codebase that make a transfer of memory ownership so that developers don't need to worry about releasing that memory anymore, and hence, we don't want to report leaks on that memory.
Things get a little more complicated, because some of the functions we want to model are in a specific namespace, so with this flag we take both cases into account, when we are dealing with namespaces or not.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21404409
fbshipit-source-id: c36bd7afc
Summary:
bigmacro_bender
There are 3 ways pulse tracks history. This is at least one too many. So
far, we have:
1. "histories": a humble list of "events" like "assigned here", "returned from call", ...
2. "interproc actions": a structured nesting of calls with a final "action", eg "f calls g calls h which does blah"
3. "traces", which combine one history with one interproc action
This diff gets rid of interproc actions and makes histories include
"nested" callee histories too. This allows pulse to track and display
how a value got assigned across function calls.
Traces are now more powerful and interleave histories and interproc
actions. This allows pulse to track how a value is fed into an action,
for instance performed in callee, which itself creates some more
(potentially now interprocedural) history before going to the next step
of the action (either another call or the action itself).
This gives much better traces, and some examples are added to showcase
this.
There are a lot of changes when applying summaries to keep track of
histories more accurately than was done before, but also a few
simplifications that give additional evidence that this is the right
concept.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17908942
fbshipit-source-id: 3b62eaf78
Summary:
Unfortunately it is very hard to predict when
`Typ.Procname.describe` will add `()` after the function name, so we
cannot make sure it is always there.
Right now we report clowny stuff like "error while calling `foo()()`",
which this change fixes.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17665470
fbshipit-source-id: ef290d9c0
Summary: This shows that the current Pulse analyzer works fine in the C++ part of the Objc++ files.
Reviewed By: martintrojer
Differential Revision: D17225683
fbshipit-source-id: faf51c5fa