Summary:
Instead of checking that each address in the pre that must be valid is
not invalid in the caller (and error out if it turns out it is invalid)
as we discover them, save these checks for after we are sure that the
precondition can be applied. It is in fact a bug that we can report an
error when trying to apply a precondition that is actually not
satisfiable in the current state for other reasons than lifetime issues.
We still want to skip calls in case of weird issues like mismatch in
number of formals vs actuals.
This will have more obvious effects later when we also check that
arithmetic facts in preconditions are satisfied at the call site: if a
pre mandates "x=1" and "y must be valid" and we have "x=0" and "y
invalid" then we shouldn't report an error.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18115229
fbshipit-source-id: ad4ce72ff
Summary:
If a precondition cannot be applied, it means that this program path
somehow doesn't make sense for the caller and so should be pruned. Right
now we just treat this as skipping over the call instead.
This will become more important when specs start mentioning arithmetic
facts that must be satisfied at the call site. As it is we will only
stop if we discover aliasing in the pre not present at the call site or
vice versa.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D18115230
fbshipit-source-id: 4f1c7a583
Summary: The way `<=` is used in `AbstractDomain` prevents infix use and forces bracketing it everywhere. Replace with simple `leq`.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D18201854
fbshipit-source-id: 8175224e4
Summary: This will be more useful later when adding another one.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, jberdine
Differential Revision: D18115231
fbshipit-source-id: a0a01901a
Summary:
The business of translating `Top/True/False` to `true/false` can be
hidden more.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18115228
fbshipit-source-id: 071fcbddf
Summary:
Warning 33 (unused open) is enabled but the module open is not really
unused, it's just also opened at the top of the file...
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18114385
fbshipit-source-id: 2a8f9512a
Summary:
That module's interface was repeated twice to avoid exposing its
internals to PulseDomain itself. It's also quite long so it makes sense
to move it to its own file.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17977209
fbshipit-source-id: 56a2dac24
Summary:
Another poorman's library, this time about Pulse Domains. Also renames
`PulseDomain` to `PulseBaseDomain`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17955287
fbshipit-source-id: 9c947cf98
Summary:
The name had rotten: it should be `AddrHistPair`. There is little value
of exposing the type of the pair `AbstractValue.t * ValueHistory.t`,
just inline its definition everywhere.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17955283
fbshipit-source-id: d145251e0
Summary:
See explanations in D17955104.
This renames `AbstractAddress` to `AbstractValue` since they are not
necessarily addresses.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17955290
fbshipit-source-id: 8bb4c61f2
Summary:
See explanations in D17955104. I put Attributes inside PulseAttribute
instead of creating a new file to avoid exposing more internals about
ranks.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17955284
fbshipit-source-id: a8719a58f
Summary:
Problem: PulseDomain.ml is pretty big, and contains lots of small
modules. The Infer build being a bit monolithic at the moment, it is
hard to split all these small modules off without creating some
confusion about which abstraction barries lay where. For instance, it's
fine to use `PulseDomain.ValueHistory` anywhere, but using `PulseDomain`
itself is sometimes bad when one should use `PulseAbductiveDomain`
instead.
Proposal: a poorman's library mechanism based on module aliasing. This
stack of diffs creates new Pulse* modules for all these small, safe to
use modules, together with `PulseBasicInterface.ml`, which aliases these
modules to remove the `Pulse` prefix. At the end of the stack, it will
contain:
```
module AbstractValue = PulseAbstractValue
module Attribute = PulseAttribute
module Attributes = PulseAttribute.Attributes
module CallEvent = PulseCallEvent
module Diagnostic = PulseDiagnostic
module Invalidation = PulseInvalidation
module Trace = PulseTrace
module ValueHistory = PulseValueHistory
```
This "interface" module can be opened in other pulse modules freely.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17955104
fbshipit-source-id: 13d3aa2b5
Summary:
bigmacro_bender
There are 3 ways pulse tracks history. This is at least one too many. So
far, we have:
1. "histories": a humble list of "events" like "assigned here", "returned from call", ...
2. "interproc actions": a structured nesting of calls with a final "action", eg "f calls g calls h which does blah"
3. "traces", which combine one history with one interproc action
This diff gets rid of interproc actions and makes histories include
"nested" callee histories too. This allows pulse to track and display
how a value got assigned across function calls.
Traces are now more powerful and interleave histories and interproc
actions. This allows pulse to track how a value is fed into an action,
for instance performed in callee, which itself creates some more
(potentially now interprocedural) history before going to the next step
of the action (either another call or the action itself).
This gives much better traces, and some examples are added to showcase
this.
There are a lot of changes when applying summaries to keep track of
histories more accurately than was done before, but also a few
simplifications that give additional evidence that this is the right
concept.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17908942
fbshipit-source-id: 3b62eaf78
Summary:
I dunno, seemed wrong before. About to introduce another attribute with
similar arguments so making them consistent in advance.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17930349
fbshipit-source-id: 944b58bac
Summary:
- add the variable being declared so we can report it back in the trace in addition to its location
- distinguish between local vars and formals
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17930348
fbshipit-source-id: a5b863e64
Summary:
When we make the decision to go into a branch "v = N" where some
abstract value is compared to a constant, remember the corresponding
equality. This allows to prune simple infeasible paths
intra-procedurally.
Further work is needed to make this useful interprocedurally, for
instance either or both of these ideas could be explored:
- abduce v=N in the precondition and do not apply summaries when the
equalities in the pre are not satisfied
- prune post-conditions that lead to unsat states where a value has to
be equal to several different constants
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17906166
fbshipit-source-id: 5cc84abc2
Summary:
When we know "x = 3" and we have a condition "x != 3" we know we can
prune the corresponding path.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17665472
fbshipit-source-id: 988958ea6
Summary:
First step in having a value domain: record concrete values. We record
them as equalities to abstract values using a new attribute `Constant`.
In a way, attributes are already our "pure" part in the "formulas" that
are pulse abstract domains, so this is reminiscent of existing
separation logic implementations. Trying to add values directly in the
"heap" part proved very cumbersome whereas this approach is very simple,
allowing us to ignore values most of the time except when we actually
care.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17665473
fbshipit-source-id: b8033ad9c
Summary:
Unfortunately it is very hard to predict when
`Typ.Procname.describe` will add `()` after the function name, so we
cannot make sure it is always there.
Right now we report clowny stuff like "error while calling `foo()()`",
which this change fixes.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17665470
fbshipit-source-id: ef290d9c0
Summary:
Having just numbers for abstract values is a tad confusing. The change
is also needed for having actual constant values later.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17665469
fbshipit-source-id: 20dff7bbe
Summary:
Turns out `Memory.add_attributes` was only used to add singletons so
deleted that in the process.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17627725
fbshipit-source-id: 0abe3889d
Summary:
This was bogus: when evaluating `e[e']` we were checking that `e'` is a
valid pointer.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17627727
fbshipit-source-id: 536384e95
Summary:
Introduce a new experimental checker (`--impurity`) that detects
impurity information, tracking which parameters and global variables
of a function are modified. The checker relies on Pulse to detect how
the state changes: it traverses the pre and post pairs starting from
the parameter/global variable and finds where the pre and post heaps
diverge. At diversion points, we expect to see WrittenTo/Invalid attributes
containing a trace of how the address was modified. We use these to
construct the trace of impurity.
This checker is a complement to the purity checker that exists mainly
for Java (and used for cost and loop-hoisting analyses). The aim of
this new experimental checker is to rely on Pulse's precise
memory treatment and come up with a more precise im(purity)
analysis. To distinguish the two checkers, we introduce a new issue
type `IMPURE_FUNCTION` that reports when a function is impure, rather
than when it is pure (as in the purity checker).
TODO:
- improve the analysis to rely on impurity information of external
library calls. Currently, all library calls are assumed to be nops,
hence pure.
- de-entangle Pulse reporting from analysis.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17051567
fbshipit-source-id: 5e10afb4f
Summary:
It uses inline record for Sil.Load and Sil.Store for preparing the
following extention.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D17161288
fbshipit-source-id: 637ea7bfa
Summary: Like we removed empty edges from the `pre_heap` in D16419183, let's do the same to `post_heap`.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17111336
fbshipit-source-id: c35fcbabb
Summary:
Before this diff we would record when some values came from the "address
of" logical variables. This makes no sense and also was incorrectly
marking these addresses as "written to" when they appeared in the post
of a procedure, because their attributes weren't empty (they had the
"address of stack variable" attribute).
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17131210
fbshipit-source-id: 6cc3c465a
Summary:
Pulse didn't treat local variables going out of scope as invalidating the corresponding address in memory. This diff fixes that by
- marking all local variables that exits the scope with the attribute `AddressOfStackVariable`
- before we write the summary for the proc, we make sure to invalidate all such addresses local to the procedure as `Invalid.` If such an address is read, then we would raise a use-after-lifetime issue.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D16458355
fbshipit-source-id: 3686524cb
Summary:
A common gotcha is the new test. Model the minimum amount of
`std::basic_string` to catch it.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16121090
fbshipit-source-id: 66f06cb43
Summary:
Be more flexible in what type of function calls are allowed in `ViaCall ...` actions to be able to include models.
Also get rid of `here here` in traces /o\
As a side-effect, get more precise (=qualified) procedure names in
traces (but not in messages so as not to be too verbose).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16121092
fbshipit-source-id: fb51b02f8
Summary:
The fields `tenv` and `integer_type_widths` can be obtained from the `exe_env` field of `proc_callback_args`
This commit removes the redundant fields
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16149520
fbshipit-source-id: d37526fd4
Summary:
Cluster checkers call `SummaryPayload.read` but set the `caller_summary` to correspond to the same summary as gives the `callee_pname`
This change introduces a new method `read_toplevel_procedure` that does not require a `caller_summary`, to be used by the cluster checkers
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16131660
fbshipit-source-id: 12caa1000
Summary:
Change the datatype `ProcData` to include a field of type `Summary.t` instead of a field of type `Procdesc.t`
This will enable a later commit to supply a summary to `Ondemand.analyze_proc_desc` and `Ondemand.analyze_proc_name`
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16121405
fbshipit-source-id: 342374121
Jules Villard
Nikos Gorogiannis
Ezgi Çiçek
Sungkeun Cho
Phoebe Nichols