Summary:
Model for `folly::split` that handles the representation in the cpp model.
Depends on D6544992
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D6545006
fbshipit-source-id: 2b7a139
Summary:
Before this diff, the nullable checker would not be able to find annotations involving methods annotated in the protocols
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6534893
fbshipit-source-id: 39bd3dd
Summary: This is to allow the bi-abduction analysis and the nullable checker for Clang languages to run together without stepping on each other toes.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6567934
fbshipit-source-id: a318c33
Summary: There was a back and forth conversion between `string` and `IssueType.t` which was not necessary.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6562747
fbshipit-source-id: 70b57a2
Summary: As Dulma pointed out, adding or removing paramters in a method in Objective C is changing the name of the method. Such changes should not make pre-exisiting issues reported as introduced. This diff is to prevent this by only keeping in the bug hash the part of the name that is before the first colon.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D6491215
fbshipit-source-id: 3c00fae
Summary:
Our model of unique_ptr and shared_ptr relied on the fact that we could C-style cast a pointer to the internal pointer type used in the smart pointer.
This is wrong when the smart pointer is used with a custom deleter that declares its own pointer type whose is not constructible from just a single pointer.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D6496203
fbshipit-source-id: 1305137
Summary: Local `CKComponentScope`'s are often created purely for their side effects, so it's fine for them to be unread.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D6475475
fbshipit-source-id: 17e869a
Summary: This would allow the checker to detect indirect nullable violations, i.e. violations that are involving intermediate method calls on potentially `nil` values.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6464900
fbshipit-source-id: 3663729
Summary: NSDictionary initialization will crash when using `nil` as a key or as a value
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D6466349
fbshipit-source-id: 57bb012
Summary: This will avoid collisions when the inner classes are implementing the same methods. For example, the previous version of the bug hash could conflate the issues when several annonymous inner classes are implementing the same method, e.g. a annonymous subclass of `Runnable` implementing `run()`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6461594
fbshipit-source-id: 2bb8545
Summary:
Simpler bug hash that is more independent of the underlying analysis. This now computes the hash based on:
- the bug type.
- the base filename: i.e for my/source/File.java, just keep File.java. So the hash will not change when moving files around.
- the simple method name: i.e. without package information and list of parameters. So changing the list of parameters will not affect the bug hash.
- the error message were the line numbers have been removed. So moving code or reformatting will not affect the hash.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D6445639
fbshipit-source-id: 82e3cbe
Summary: To avoid false positives, we treat `operator[]` in cpp as container read. Moreover, if a container `c` is owned, we make all accesses `c[i]` to be also owned.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6396574
fbshipit-source-id: 94aabff
Summary:
It seems that the abstraction instructions were not previously added the the CFG.
This is a functional changes to make sure that the abstraction state is always added. We can simplify the code later and just run this step before storing the CFG instead of after loading them.
Reviewed By: sblackshear, jvillard
Differential Revision: D6383672
fbshipit-source-id: cedcb8a
Summary:
As da319 points out, we did not handle this case correctly before. There were a few reasons why:
(1) An assignment like `struct S s = mk_s()` gets translated as `tmp = mk_s(); S(&s, tmp)`, so we didn't see the write to `s`.
(2) We counted uses of variables in destructors and dummy `_ = *s` assignments as reads, which meant that any struct values were considered as live.
This diff fixes these limitations so we can report on dead stores of struct values.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D6327564
fbshipit-source-id: 2ead4be
Summary:
The diff is very big but it's mostly removing code. It was inspired by the fact that we were getting Dead Store FPs because we were modeling some functions from CoreFoundation and CoreGraphics directly as alloc in the frontend, which caused the parameters of the function to be seen as dead. See the new test.
To deal with this, if we are going to skip the function, we model it as malloc instead. Given how many models we had for those "model as malloc" functions, I removed them to rely solely on the new mechanism.
The modeling of malloc and release was still based on the old retain count implementation, even though all we do here is a malloc/free kind of analysis. I also changed
that to be actually malloc/free which removed many Assert false in the tests. CFRelease is not exactly free though, and it's possible to use the variable afterwards. So used a custom free builtin that only cares about removing the Memory attribute and focuses on minimizing Memory Leaks FPs.
Otherwise we were translating CFBridgingRelease as a special cast, and this wasn't working. To simplify this as well, I removed all the code for the special cast, and just modeled CFBridgingRelease and CFAutorelease also as free_cf, to avoid Memory Leak false positives. I also treated the cast __bridge_transfer as a free_cf model. This means we stopped trying to report Memory Leaks on those objects.
The modeling of CoreGraph release functions was done in the frontend, but seemed simpler to also simplify that code and model all the relevant functions.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6397150
fbshipit-source-id: b1dc636
Summary:
- Plug model checkers
- Add alloc size safety condition on alloc of negative, zero or big size
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6375144
fbshipit-source-id: bbea6f3