Summary: This diff comments out a test that introduces non-deterministic analysis result.
Reviewed By: rgrig
Differential Revision: D28440794
fbshipit-source-id: 95e6fbe06
Summary: Although `Set.contains` could be logarithmic in the worst case, on average, the contains() runs in O(1) time. We rather take the average here, following the most common case.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D27078794
fbshipit-source-id: 24e3476e8
Summary:
Dear Infer team,
To contribute to Infer community, I would like to integrate infer#'s language agnostic layer into Infer.
Please help to review, discuss and consider to merge this feature.
Thanks,
Xiaoyu
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/1361
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D25928458
Pulled By: jvillard
fbshipit-source-id: 7726150b8
Summary:
Developers complain when a function that used to only throw an exception has complexity increase in the updated revision. Let's suppress such issues by giving those functions 0 cost which is already suppressed by differential reporting.
One common case to the above throw pattern is Java methods that throw an unsupported implementation exception for a functionality that has not been implemented yet. When the developer adds the supported implementation, we don't want to warn them with complexity increase since they are adding new functionality.
This is a design choice/heuristic to prevent noisy results for now.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D25495151
fbshipit-source-id: 94a82b062
Summary: We add a naive model for `forEach` idiom for Java's Iterable and Maps. The model is naive because it doesn't take the cost of the lambda into account. This will be fixed later.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D23868203
fbshipit-source-id: 37d169c6f
Summary:
Handle the case of
- computing the range of `[lb, ub]` where `lb` contains length path and `ub` is constant. E.g. `[a.length, 2]` would give `3` range
- simplifying `c1 +/- min(c2, a.length)` to `c1 +/- min(c2, 0)`
since the length of a collection/array is always nonnegative.
This also removes some existing FPs in tests results.
Facebook
Context: we stumbled upon this issue in ObjC results TV109717121 which is corresponding to the added test case.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23648807
fbshipit-source-id: 1e89ea246
Summary:
This diff adds a false positive test that is introduced imprecise loop
invariant detection.
In the example, `i` and a temp variable `$irvar = get_size(arr)` are
all included in the control variables, so the complexity becomes
quadratic. The problem is that `$irvar` is not addressed as a loop
invariant:
* `is.read` is analyzed as modifying a global
* all return variables, including `$irvar`, of unmodeled functions are invalidated
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D23051414
fbshipit-source-id: 011fd086b
Summary:
In Cost/Inferbo checkers, it tried to find a subclass with heuristics when a method of interface or
abstract class is called. While it makes preciser analysis results in general, sometimes introduced
tricky FPs since the behavior of the heuristics depends on targets. This diff revert the heuristics
to suppress the FPs.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D22924485
fbshipit-source-id: 9f151231f
Summary: D17500386 had added the ability to give symbolic values on functions returning exceptions. However, this might cause FPs or cryptic complexity reports (especially with subclass heuristics). This diff aims to revert it back.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22764266
fbshipit-source-id: 1615544d8
Summary: `addAll` adds elements one by one and hence takes linear time. We didn't have a model for this and considered it O(1).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22375157
fbshipit-source-id: 65b82bfae
Summary: This diff prevents printing line numbers of loop in the trace description, which helps to keep the same descriptions even when the line number of a function is changed in tests.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22375584
fbshipit-source-id: 676d1a7cc
Summary:
This diff adds a model of `File.listFiles` as returning an array with
a symbolic length.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22332258
fbshipit-source-id: 6ca593b8b
Summary:
This diff tries to support a specific form of linked list iteration in Java.
```
while (p != null) {
p = p.getNext();
}
```
This example was a constant cost before because the cost checker could not detect that it is an iteration on a linked list.
The heuristic this diff implemented is:
(1) `p = p.getNext()`: It tries to find this specific form of assignment. Then, it increments `p.linked_list_index` by 1. Note that `linked_list_index` is a virtual field for keeping an index in the linked list. Its initial value is always 0.
(2) At `p != null`, it tries to prune the value of `p.linked_list_index`: the upper-bound of `p.linked_list_index` is pruned by `<= p.linked_list_length`. Here again, `p.linked_list_length` is also a virtual field to denote the length of the linked list.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22234892
fbshipit-source-id: 2fee176bb
Summary: We do not use an arbitrary threshold to test cost results anymore but instead rely on `cost-issues` which do not have any trace attached. This diff adds traces to `costs-report.json` so that we can test cost issues with traces.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21858846
fbshipit-source-id: e73321a92
Summary:
The model returns an array the length of which is the same to that of enum entries.
It takes the length of enum entries from the summary of `Enum.values` because it is not written in `tenv`. In order to do that, the model semantics should be able to request the summary of the function with `get_summary`, so I extended `model_env` to include the functionality.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21843319
fbshipit-source-id: d6f10eb91
Summary:
The model returns an array the length of which is the number of known
fields in `tenv`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21840375
fbshipit-source-id: 891517c6e
Summary:
In order to test cost analysis results, currently we rely on having an arbitrary cost threshold (200) and report issues that exceed this cost. For instance, a cost of 201 is considered expensive and reported as `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME` issue in cost tests.
This means, if we change the cost analysis in a slight way that results in some constant cost increase under 200, we wouldn't able to detect it. I find this unsatisfactory and somewhat hacky.
This diff adds the ability to write the result of `costs-report.json` into a separate `cost-issues.exp` and then compare the actual costs (not only than relying on this arbitrary threshold reporting mechanism).
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21816312
fbshipit-source-id: 93b531928
Sungkeun Cho
Ezgi Çiçek
Xiaoyu Liu