Summary:
Most/all of the time we expect the history of the value to faithfully
trace how it got allocated. That history was then added as a prefix of
the trace leading to the same place, leading to duplicate information in
the report trace.
We may need to do the same for other bug types.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D28536891
fbshipit-source-id: a83a2d038
Summary: Showcase the trace duplication, fixed in a further diff.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D28536889
fbshipit-source-id: f23636368
Summary:
Turns out the mistake was pretty simple: we just forgot to keep the
history of the return value in the callee and add it to the caller's.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28385941
fbshipit-source-id: 40fe09c99
Summary:
- Changed "passed as argument to f" to "in call to f", as these do not
always correspond to passing an argument (eg could be a value returned
from f)
- Changed "assigned" to "returned" when appropriate
- Changed the model of malloc() to not say "allocated" in the null case
- Don't print "returned from f" when there was no event inside f: just
print "in call to f".
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28413900
fbshipit-source-id: bc85625e3
Summary:
The order was reversed when printing the trace, leading to confusion.
Also make sure we indicate which part of the trace we are printing when
there is more than one part (either context + access or invalidation +
access, or all three).
Also start nesting at <calling context length> to better represent the
role of the calling context visually.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D28329263
fbshipit-source-id: b691fb1f4
Summary:
There's been regressions in --pulse-isl. Without tests, everything is
temporary!
Note: the regressions are presumably still there, this just records the
current status of pulse.isl.
Also, no objective-C(++) at the moment. Should we add them too? (in
another diff)
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D28256703
fbshipit-source-id: 700b2cc57
Jules Villard