Summary:
Split the translation of return more aggressively between:
1. the instruction that has to happen before the translation of the sub-expr
2. the sub-expr
3. the instruction that has to happen after the sub-expr
This is needed for the next diff which creates potentially large CFGs in
(2).
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D24954071
fbshipit-source-id: a7e7e2527
Summary:
This also prints the CFGs *after* pre-analysis for individual procedures
in infer-out/captured/<filename>/<proc>.dot. One can also look up the
CFGs before pre-analysis in infer-out/captured/proc_cfgs_frontend.dot.
Context: I want to add a pre-analysis that needs to look at proc
attributes inter-procedurally. For this to make sense it has to happen
*after* all of capture, and before analysis.
Thus, this diff brings back the lazy running of the pre-analysis like in
D15803492, except that we still make sure to run the pre-analyses
systematically regardless of the checkers being run by running the
pre-analysis from ondemand.ml. Also we don't need to re-introduce the
"did_preanalysis" proc attribute for the same reason that the
pre-analysis is now run once and for all by ondemand.ml (instead of each
individual checker back in the days).
This has the benefit of running the pre-analysis only when needed, and
the drawback that several concurrent processes analysing the same proc
descs will duplicate work. Since pre-analyses are supposed to be very
fast I assume that neither is a big deal. If they become more expensive
then the benefit gets bigger and the drawback is just the same as with
regular analyses.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18573920
fbshipit-source-id: de350eaef
Summary:
This started as an attempt to understand how to modify the frontend to
inject destructors for C++ temporaries (see next diffs).
This diff rewrites the existing logic for computing the list of
variables that should be destroyed at the end of each statement, either
because it's the end of their syntactic scope or because control flow
branches outside of their syntactic scope.
The frontend translates a function from the last instructions to the
first, but scope computation needs to be done in the other direction, so
it's done in a separate pass *before* the main translation happens. That
first pass creates a map from statements in the AST to the list of
variables that should be destroyed at the end of these statements. This
is still the case now.
Before, that map would be computed in a bit of a weird way: scopes are
naturally a stack but instead of that the structure maintained was a
flat list + a counter to know where the current scope ended in that
list.
In this diff, redo the computation maintaining a stack of scopes
instead, which is a bit cleaner. Also treat more instructions as
introducing a new scope, eg if, for, ...
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D15674208
fbshipit-source-id: c92429e82
Summary:
Instead of emitting an ad-hoc builtin on variable declaration emit a new
metadata instruction. This allows us to remove the code matching on that
ad-hoc builtin that had to be inserted in several checkers.
Inferbo & pulse used that information meaningfully and had to undergo
some minor changes to cope with the new metada instruction.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14833100
fbshipit-source-id: 9b3009d22
Summary:
Before, the liveness pre-analysis would place extra instructions in the
CFG for either:
1. marking an `Ident.t` as dead, or
2. marking a `Pvar.t` as `= 0`
But we have no way of marking pvars dead without setting them to 0. This
is bad because setting pvars to 0 is not possible everywhere they are
dead. Indeed, we only do it when we haven't seen their address being
taken anyway. This prevents the following situation, recorded in our tests:
```
int address_taken() {
int** x;
int* y;
int i = 7;
y = &i;
x = &y;
// if we don't reason about taken addresses while adding nullify instructions,
// we'll add
// `nullify(y)` here and report a false NPE on the next line
return **x;
}
```
So we want to mark pvars as dead without nullifying them. This diff
extends the `Remove_temps` SIL instruction to accept pvars as well, and
so renames it to `ExitScope`.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13102953
fbshipit-source-id: aa7f03a52
Summary:
Useful to understand the changes in the pre-analysis, or to inspect the
CFG that checkers actually get.
This means that the pre-analysis always runs when we output the dotty,
but I don't really see a reason why not. In fact, we could probably
*always* store the CFGs as pre-analysed.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13102952
fbshipit-source-id: 89f3102ec
Summary:
When initialising a variable via semi-exotic means, the frontend loses
the information that the variable was initialised. For instance, it
translates:
```
struct Foo { int i; };
...
Foo s = {42};
```
as:
```
s.i := 42
```
This can be confusing for backends that need to know that `s` actually
got initialised, eg pulse.
The solution implemented here is to insert of dummy call to
`__variable_initiazition`:
```
__variable_initialization(&s);
s.i := 42;
```
Then checkers can recognise that this builtin function does what its
name says.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12887122
fbshipit-source-id: 6e7214438
Summary:
Change the license of the source code from BSD + PATENTS to MIT.
Change `checkCopyright` to reflect the new license and learn some new file
types.
Generated with:
```
git grep BSD | xargs -n 1 ./scripts/checkCopyright -i
```
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil, mbouaziz, jberdine
Differential Revision: D8071249
fbshipit-source-id: 97ca23a
Summary:
Previously, the type of `trans_result` contained a list of SIL expressions.
However, most of the time we expect to get exactly one, and getting a different
number is a soft(!) error, usually returning `-1`.
This splits `trans_result` into `control`, which contains the information
needed for temporary computation (hence when we don't necessarily know the
return value yet), and a new version of `trans_result` that includes `control`,
the previous `exps` list but replaced by a single `return` expression instead,
and a couple other values that made sense to move out of `control`. This allows
some flexibility in the frontend compared to enforcing exactly one return
expression always: if they are not known yet we stick to `control` instead (see
eg `compute_controls_to_parent`).
This creates more garbage temporary identifiers, however they do not show up in
the final cfg. Instead, we see that temporary IDs are now often not
consecutive...
The most painful complication is in the treatment of `DeclRefExpr`, which was
actually returning *two* expressions: the method name and the `this` object.
Now the method name is a separate (optional) field in `trans_result`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D7881088
fbshipit-source-id: 41ad3b5
Summary:
Not sure what an "iCFG" is but the dotty is only about CFGs anyway.
Diff obtained by mass-`sed`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D6324280
fbshipit-source-id: b7603bb
Summary:
The previous domain for SIOF was duplicating some work with the generic Trace
domain, and basically was a bit confused and confusing. A sink was a set of
global accesses, and a state contains a set of sinks. Then the checker has to
needlessly jump through hoops to normalize this set of sets of accesses into a
set of accesses.
The new domain has one sink = one access, as suggested by sblackshear. This simplifies
a few things, and makes the dedup logic much easier: just grab the first report
of the list of reports for a function.
We only report on the fake procedures generated to initialise a global, and the
filtering means that we keep only one report per global.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5932138
fbshipit-source-id: acb7285
Summary:
With this change and the previous facebook-clang-plugins change, infer no
longer exhausts the biniou buffer when reading the serialized C++ AST.
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5891081
fbshipit-source-id: cf48eac
Summary: The prune nodes where translated as `prune (expr = false)` and `prune ( expr != false)`. This case is a bit tricky to deconstruct in HIL. This diff translates the prune instructions as just `prune !expr` for the true branch and `prune expr` for the false branch.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D5832147
fbshipit-source-id: 2c3502d
Summary: The successor node of `continue` was not correct inside the `do while`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5769578
fbshipit-source-id: d7b0843
Jules Villard
Mehdi Bouaziz
Ezgi Çiçek
Jeremy Dubreil
Daiva Naudziuniene