Summary:public
Before this diff, the Java frontend was not adding the definition of the inherited interfaces to the type environment, thus failing to answer questions like "does type X implements Closeable". Infer was therefore missing to detect resource leaks when the resource was indirectly implementing Closeable via an intermediate interface.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D3067555
fb-gh-sync-id: 86d0760
shipit-source-id: 86d0760
Summary:This pull request adds the SuppressViewNullability annotation.
The reasoning behind this is that in libraries, one cannot use Butterknife for view binding, which forces you to do it manually. Basically, this makes a new annotation that infer treats the same way as Bind/InjectView
Closes https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/301
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D3047235
Pulled By: cristianoc
fb-gh-sync-id: 6286d2b
shipit-source-id: 6286d2b
Summary:public
Use the configuration file .inferconfig to model the library method that are considered expensive
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D3045288
fb-gh-sync-id: e58d85c
shipit-source-id: e58d85c
Summary:public
Lazy dynamic dispatch handling works as follows:
Assuming a call of the form:
foo(a);
where the static type of `a` is `A`. If during the symbolic execution, the dynamic type of the variable `a` is `B` where `B <: A`, then we create on-demand a copy `foo(B)` of `foo(A)` where all the uses of the typed parameter `a` are replaced with a parameter of type `B`. Especially, if `foo` contains virtual call, say `get` where `a` is the receiver, then the call gets redirected to the overridden method in `B`, which simulates the runtime behavior of Java.
This lazy dynamic dispatch mode is only turn on for the tracing mode for now in order to avoid conflicts with sblackshear's approach for sound dynamic dispatch.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2888922
fb-gh-sync-id: 3250c9e
shipit-source-id: 3250c9e
Summary:public
Deprecate the incremental mode.
Several parts of the back-end can be removed.
The options for incremental analysis -i at the python level are now deprecated, and re-routed to --reactive.
The main difference with --reactive is that it does not produce an analysis of the whole project, but is limited to what is reachable via reactive propagation starting from the changed files.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2960078
fb-gh-sync-id: 6e8b46b
shipit-source-id: 6e8b46b
Summary:public
The NoAllocation checker should not report on the creation of exceptions
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2969719
fb-gh-sync-id: 4a8ffc8
shipit-source-id: 4a8ffc8
Summary:public
Add to the code to detect violation of the `NoAllocation` annotation. This diff adds the code to detect such issue based on the code of the `PerformanceCritical` checker. In the next diff, I will refine the list of acceptable allocations, like new exceptions, etc, and add the list of corresponding tests.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2938641
fb-gh-sync-id: 9a047dd
shipit-source-id: 9a047dd
Summary:public
Before this diff, the checker was collecting in a bottom-up fashion all possible call trees from `PerforamanceCritical`-annotated methods to `Expensive`-annotated ones. With this diff, we just collect the names of the direct transitively expensive callees and compute the expensive call stacks when reporting errors only.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2938635
fb-gh-sync-id: dcdd13c
shipit-source-id: dcdd13c
Summary:public
Is seems that automatically inheriting annotations like `PerformanceCritical` or `NoAllocation` is the right thing to do in general. Otherwise, we need to enforce sub-typing rules which in the best case just adds a little bit of documentation, but could miss important issues when the code is not fully annotated. I am simplifying this part to avoid adding boilerplate code for the `NoAllocation` case.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2938627
fb-gh-sync-id: ddb668b
shipit-source-id: ddb668b
Summary:
public
The inductive list predicate was not firing during abstraction because of a type mismatch between C and Java. In Java, the second parameter of the `Sil.Sizeof` constructor is always `Sil.Subtype.exact` in C but is `Sil.Subtype.subtypes` in Java. This diff fixes the confution by comparing the `Sil` types only instead of the type expressions.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D2912493
fb-gh-sync-id: 3f712a8
shipit-source-id: 3f712a8
Summary:
public
This diff fixes a race condition where errors found in a procedure by one checker could be overwritten by running on demand the analysis of the same procedure with another checker.
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2847308
fb-gh-sync-id: 4f0c78e
Summary:
public
The contravariant subtyping rule for the PerformanceCritial annotation was meant to document the code but can be very too verbose on exisiting project. It is also not necessary as we can get this annotation from the supertypes. I am disabling it for now, but keep the code in case we want to revive it at some point in the future.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2750212
fb-gh-sync-id: 2424281
Summary:
public
Lines other than the first of multi-line comments in non-ocaml files
were flush right instead of aligned.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D2739752
fb-gh-sync-id: c85f56e
Summary:
public
It is possible to return null according to
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/Class.html#getResource(java.lang.String).
Also, getResource throws NPE if passed null:
$ cat -n TestClassGetResourceArgument.java
1 import java.net.URL;
2
3 public class TestClassGetResourceArgument {
4
5 static URL testClassGetResourceArgument(Class cls) {
6 return cls.getResource(null);
7 }
8
9 public static void main(String[] args) {
10 System.out.println(testClassGetResourceArgument("".getClass()).toString());
11 }
12
13 }
$ javac TestClassGetResourceArgument.java && java TestClassGetResourceArgument
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException
at sun.misc.MetaIndex.mayContain(MetaIndex.java:243)
at sun.misc.URLClassPath$JarLoader.getResource(URLClassPath.java:830)
at sun.misc.URLClassPath.getResource(URLClassPath.java:199)
at sun.misc.URLClassPath.getResource(URLClassPath.java:251)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.getBootstrapResource(ClassLoader.java:1305)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.getResource(ClassLoader.java:1144)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.getResource(ClassLoader.java:1142)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.getSystemResource(ClassLoader.java:1267)
at java.lang.Class.getResource(Class.java:2145)
at TestClassGetResourceArgument.testClassGetResourceArgument(TestClassGetResourceArgument.java:6)
at TestClassGetResourceArgument.main(TestClassGetResourceArgument.java:10)
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2752301
fb-gh-sync-id: 888baf1
Summary:
public
Added special modelling for m.put(k,v) as assigning value v to map m at key k.
The modelling is analogous to the one for containsKey: the variable used to represent m.get(k) is generated, and assigned the value v.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D2743844
fb-gh-sync-id: 56d3581
Summary:
Change eradicate handling of complex values so that an unknown function that
has an existing mapping to Undef is treated as if there was no existing
mapping.
Without this change, joining control-flow branches where one called a function
and the other did not resulted in a mapping to Undef. Later calls to the
function would then reuse the Undef mapping.
public
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2695548
fb-gh-sync-id: ab69c47
Summary:
public
The case when a resource leaks is reported because the the resource was not closed on the execution branch created by the preconditions checks are not very interesting in practice because the exceptions thrown, either `NullPointerException` or `IllegalStateException` are very rarely caught anyway. So the legimate use of preconditions checks is creating spurious resource leak reports.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2707227
fb-gh-sync-id: 6aece73
Summary: public
The method `android.view.View.findViewById` and should not be run performance critical parts of the code like scrolling.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2698196
fb-gh-sync-id: 2716ad7
Summary: public
This allows to run the checker and get feedback about potential expensive call stacks without having to annotate first all the methods that are overriding PerofrmanceCritical-annotated methods
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2693556
fb-gh-sync-id: cb60278
Summary: public
Use the analysis summary to store call stacks from PerformanceCritical-annotated methods to Expensive-annotated methods.
This use the on demand scheduling in order to make sure that the summary of the callee is always analyzed before the callers.
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2685347
fb-gh-sync-id: ab403d9
Summary: public
Some more examples to explain the behaviour of the type checker with inheritance
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2639908
fb-gh-sync-id: d038061
Summary: public
The classes `java.util.zip.{Inflater/Deflater}` where not modelled as resources. In practice, bad memory leak can happen using these classes and forcing the call to `end()` can help to avoid waisting native memory.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2661249
fb-gh-sync-id: 1e33316
Summary: Add possibility of throwing IOException to model of
java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock, and add test case.
public
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2658203
fb-gh-sync-id: 9ca9c02
Summary: Add models of the java.nio.channels.FileChannel.tryLock methods which can
return null according to the java docs.
public
Reviewed By: sblackshear, cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2650050
fb-gh-sync-id: ae6c8ce
Summary: public
This adds the following subtyping rules:
- methods that are not annotated with Expensive cannot be overwritten by a method annotated with Expensive
- methods annotated with PerformanceCritical must be overwitten by method annotated with PerformanceCritical
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2636076
fb-gh-sync-id: eb616c9
Summary: public
Just works by running the analysis bottom-up and promoting any method as virtually annotated with `Expensive` whenever one of its callee is annotated with `Expensive`
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2635242
fb-gh-sync-id: 4401be6
Summary: public Buck prints all the output at once and it doesn't look good. So we should not print the progress bar in the tests.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D2631722
fb-gh-sync-id: 5460a70
Summary: public
This is an initial version of the Expensive checker which only report violations on direct calls. The main objective is to setup all the files for this new checker.
The next steps are:
1) run the checker in interprocedural mode
2) Save in the summary of a method foo() the annotation attribute Expensive if a direct callee of foo is annotated with Expensive
3) Check that Expensive is enforced by subtyping, i.e. check that non-expensive method cannot be overwritten by a method annotated with Expensive
Reviewed By: cristianoc
Differential Revision: D2629947
fb-gh-sync-id: 0e06f85
Summary: public
The context leaks were reported multiple times. If a leaks was found on method `f()` and `g()` calls `f()`, then the same leak was report both in `f()` and in `g()`.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2598110
fb-gh-sync-id: ca90b57
Summary: public
Extends the current activity leak checker to all sort of context leaks.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D2572548
fb-gh-sync-id: 9da18e4
Sam Blackshear
jrm
Nick Firmani
Cristiano Calcagno
Josh Berdine
Dulma Rodriguez
Dino Distefano