Summary: Add some test cases to potentially non-exhaustive case clauses.
Reviewed By: rgrig
Differential Revision: D29555525
fbshipit-source-id: f710e93e6
Summary: If a test function `F` has multiple calls to a possibly problematic function `G`, our current expected output does not tell exactly which call to `G` causes the problem. This diff splits up such functions `F` into smaller parts `F1`, `F2`, ..., so that each part only calls `G` once. This way our expected output can match more precisely.
Reviewed By: rgrig
Differential Revision: D29554848
fbshipit-source-id: bdc62731c
Summary:
Topl matches procedure names against whatever Procname.hashable_name
returns. For Java, it returns something like "java.util.ArrayList.add(...)",
but for Erlang it used to return something like "add/1": no module and
no parenthesis after. Now, Erlang returns "lists:add/1"; that is, it
includes module name. Also, Topl doesn't insist anymore on having a
paranthesis after the name.
Differential Revision: D29520365
fbshipit-source-id: d23be1cc8
Summary:
The gist of this diff is a set of Pulse models for the built-ins
that have been put in Sil by the Erlang frontend:
- __erlang_make_nil, for creating an empty list like []
- __erlang_make_cons, for creating a nonempty list like [1|[]]
- __erlang_pattern_fail, which marks that no pattern matched
The models for the first two update the abstract state. The model for
the third generates a reportable error.
The diff also includes a test.
And also a few bugfixes:
- a type ErlangAny was used sometimes instead of ErlangAny*
- a load that was meant to be n=13 was instead n=*13;
changed to (*tmp=13; n=*tmp)
- the Makefile's guard for the rebar build-system test was inside the large
guard for java analyzers; of course, we don't need java to run rebar
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D29230161
fbshipit-source-id: c8fd6d88a
Akos Hajdu
Radu Grigore