Summary:
When joining two lists of disjuncts we try to ensure there isn't a state
that under-approximates another already in the list. This helps reduce
the number of disjuncts that are generated by conditionals and loops.
Before we would always just add more disjuncts unless they were
physically equal but now we do a subgraph computation to assess
under-approximation.
We only do this half-heartedly for now however, only taking into
consideration the "new" disjuncts vs the "old" ones. It probably makes
sense to do a full quadratic search to minimise the number of disjuncts
from time to time but this isn't done here.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14258482
fbshipit-source-id: c2dad4889
Summary:
The disjunctive domain shouldn't really be a set in the first place as
comparing abstract states for equality is expensive to do naively
(walking the whole maps representing the abstract heap). Moreover in
practice these sets have a small max size (currently 50 for pulse, the
only client), so switching them to plain lists makes sense.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14258489
fbshipit-source-id: c512169eb
Summary:
It's useful to keep the size of states down, especially when humans are
trying to read it. It will also help keep the size of summaries down in
the inter-procedural pulse.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D14258486
fbshipit-source-id: 45ebcac67
Summary:
Record per-location traces. Actually, that doesn't quite make sense as a
location can be accessed in many ways, so associate a trace to each
*edge* in the memory graph. For instance, when doing `x->f = *y`, we
want to take the history of the `<val of y> --*--> ..` edge, add "assigned
at location blah" to it and store this extended history to the edge
`<val of x> --f--> ..`.
Use this machinery to print nicer traces in `infer explore` and better
error messages too (include the last assignment, like biabduction
messages).
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13518668
fbshipit-source-id: 0a62fb55f
Summary: Adding a test case for use after destructor for temporaries. At the moment pulse does not find it as frontend does not inject destructors for temporaries.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13506229
fbshipit-source-id: 31b9466f7
Summary:
When a C++ temporary goes out of scope, tag its address in the heap with
a new attribute `AddressOfCppTemporary` so that we can later check that
we don't return it.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13466898
fbshipit-source-id: 8808338b4
Summary:
When assign to the special `return` variable, check that the result is
not the address of a local variable, otherwise report.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D13466896
fbshipit-source-id: 465da7f13
Summary: Naming it `FP_` was a mistake in the original commit that copied the tests over as pulse has never reported on that method.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13465324
fbshipit-source-id: f8b24ebda
Summary:
It's ok to take an address of a field / array access of an invalid object.
This diff calculates the inner most dereference for an access expression starting with `&` and does not report on the dereference even if the address is invalid.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13450758
fbshipit-source-id: 18c038701
Summary:
When we create Dereference edge, we also create TakeAddress back edge. This causes false positives for stack variables. When we write to a stack variable and then take its address, the resulting address is the one from the back edge of the written value. See example `push_back_value_ok`. To solve this issue, this diff changes stack to denote a map from address of variables rather than from variables.
We still have issue for fields, see example, FP_push_back_value_field_ok. To solve this, we probably need to remove back edges.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13432415
fbshipit-source-id: 9254a1a6d
Summary:
When a lambda gets created, record the abstract addresses it captures, then
complain if we see some of them be invalidated before it is called.
Add a notion of "allocator" for reporting better messages. The messages are
still a bit sucky, will need to improve them more generally at some point.
```
jul lambda ~ infer 1 infer -g --pulse-only -- clang -std=c++11 -c infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp
Logs in /home/jul/infer.fb/infer-out/logs
Capturing in make/cc mode...
Found 1 source file to analyze in /home/jul/infer.fb/infer-out
Found 2 issues
infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp:21: error: USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR
`&(f)` accesses address `s` captured by `&(f)` as `s` invalidated by destructor call `S_~S(s)` at line 20, column 3 past its lifetime (debug: 5).
19. f = [&s] { return s.f; };
20. } // destructor for s called here
21. > return f(); // s used here
22. }
23.
infer/tests/codetoanalyze/cpp/pulse/closures.cpp:30: error: USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR
`&(f)` accesses address `s` captured by `&(f)` as `s` invalidated by destructor call `S_~S(s)` at line 29, column 3 past its lifetime (debug: 8).
28. f = [&] { return s.f; };
29. }
30. > return f();
31. }
32.
Summary of the reports
USE_AFTER_DESTRUCTOR: 2
```
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D13400074
fbshipit-source-id: 3c68ff4ea
Summary: Model more `std::vector` functions that can potentially invalidate references to vector's elements (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13399161
fbshipit-source-id: 95cf2cae6
Summary:
Some code calls `this->~Obj()` then proceeds to use fields in the current
object, which previously we would report as invalid uses. Assume people know
what they are doing and ignore destructor calls to `this`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13401145
fbshipit-source-id: f6b0fb6ec
Summary: Similarly as `std::vector::push_back`, `std::vector::reserve` can invalidate the references to elements if the new size is bigger than the existing one. More info on `std::vector::reserve`: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector/reserve
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13340324
fbshipit-source-id: bf99b6923
Summary: Instead of variable having the value of a single location on stack, we now allow variables to have multiple locations. Consequently, we also allow a memory location to point to a set of locations in the heap. We enforce a limit on a maximum number of locations in a set (currently 5).
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D13190876
fbshipit-source-id: 5cb5ba9a6
Summary: Recent improvements in join fixed `FP_allocate_in_branch_ok` because the variable was not read after the join.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D13233441
fbshipit-source-id: 89b701e12
Summary:
It's useful for checkers to know when variables go out of scope to
perform garbage collection in their domains, especially for complex
domains with non-trivial joins. This makes the analyses more precise at
little cost.
This could have been added as a custom function call to a builtin, but I
decided against it because this instruction doesn't have the semantics
of any function call. It's better for each checker to explicitly not
deal with the custom instruction instead.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D13102951
fbshipit-source-id: 33be22fab
Summary:
Update clang plugin which now gives names to variables captured by lambdas that were empty before.
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12979015
fbshipit-source-id: 0b092fb24
Summary:
It turns out keeping attributes (such as invalidation facts) separate
from the memory is a bad idea and leads to loss of precision and false
positives, as seen in the new test (which previously generated a
report).
Allow me to illustrate on this example, which is a stylised version of
the issue in the added test: previously we'd have:
```
state1 = { x = 1; invalids={} }
state2 = { x = 2; invalids ={1} }
join(state1, state2) = { x = {1, 2}; invalids={{1, 2}} }
```
So even though none of the states said that `x` pointed to an invalid
location, the join state says it does because `1` and `2` have been
glommed together. The fact `x=1` from `state1` and the fact "1 is
invalid" from `state2` conspire together and `x` is now invalid even
though it shouldn't.
Instead, if we record attributes as part of the memory we get that `x`
is still valid after the join:
```
state1 = { x = (1, {}) }
state2 = { x = (2, {}) }
join(state1, state2) = { x = ({1, 2}, {}) }
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12958130
fbshipit-source-id: 53dc81cc7
Summary:
I hear that this scheduler is better. I want the best scheduler
possible. Also pulse's join is a bit complex so it might matter one day.
whydididothis
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12958131
fbshipit-source-id: 3bd77ccba
Summary: For a general case of `operator=` we want to create a fresh location for the first parameter as `operator=` behaves as copy assignment.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12940635
fbshipit-source-id: 89c6e530d
Summary:
Whenever `vec.reserve(n)` is called, remember that the vector is
"reserved". When doing `vec.push_back(x)` on a reserved vector, assume
enough size has been reserved in advance and do not invalidate the
underlying array.
This gets rid of false positives.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12939837
fbshipit-source-id: ce6354fc5
Summary:
Instead of keeping at most one invalidation fact for each address, keep
a set of them and call them "attributes". Keeping a set of invalidation
facts is redundant since we always only want the smallest one, but
makes the implementation simpler, especially once we add more kinds of
attributes (used for modelling, see next diffs).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12939839
fbshipit-source-id: 4a54c2132
Summary:
Copied on the ownership checker logic: return the initial value of the
domain as return. This can probably be improved.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12888102
fbshipit-source-id: 9e2dac7fc
Summary:
When initialising a variable via semi-exotic means, the frontend loses
the information that the variable was initialised. For instance, it
translates:
```
struct Foo { int i; };
...
Foo s = {42};
```
as:
```
s.i := 42
```
This can be confusing for backends that need to know that `s` actually
got initialised, eg pulse.
The solution implemented here is to insert of dummy call to
`__variable_initiazition`:
```
__variable_initialization(&s);
s.i := 42;
```
Then checkers can recognise that this builtin function does what its
name says.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D12887122
fbshipit-source-id: 6e7214438
Summary:
Now that arrays are dealt with separately (see previous diff), we can
turn the join back into an over-approximation as far as invalid
locations are concerned.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D12881989
fbshipit-source-id: fd85e49c0
Summary:
This prevents the join from wrongly assuming that we haven't seen a
variable on one side of the join.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D12881987
fbshipit-source-id: 42a776adb
Summary: For `operator=(lhs, rhs)` we want to model it as an assignment if rhs is materialized temporary created in the constructor.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D10462510
fbshipit-source-id: 998341e69
Summary: Do not create a new location for placement new argument if it already exists.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12839942
fbshipit-source-id: 758b67a82
Summary:
Get rid of `USE_AFTER_LIFETIME`. This could be useful to deploy pulse
alongside the ownership checker too.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D12857477
fbshipit-source-id: 8e2a2a37c
Summary:
Keep `USE_AFTER_LIFETIME` for unclassified errors (for now it contains
vector invalidation too because I can't think of a good name for
them, and maybe it makes sense to wait until we have more types of them
to decide on a name).
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D12825060
fbshipit-source-id: bd75ef698
Summary:
Getting this right will be long and complex so for now the easiest is to
underreport and only consider as invalid the addresses we know to be invalid on
both sides of a join. In fact the condition for an address to be invalid after
a join is more complex than this: it is invalid only if *all* the addresses in
its equivalence class as discovered by the join are invalid.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D12823925
fbshipit-source-id: 2ca109356
Summary: Similarly as for destructors, we provide an address of an object as a first parameter to constructors. When constructor is called we want to create a fresh location for a new object.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D10868433
fbshipit-source-id: b60f32953
Summary: We provide an address of an object as a parameter to destructor. When destructor is called the object itself is invalidated, but not the address.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D12824032
fbshipit-source-id: 516eebcf8
Summary:
The time has come to keep track of which tests pass and which are FP/FN
for pulse.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10854064
fbshipit-source-id: 60938e48f
Summary:
Turns out once a vector array became invalid it stayed that way, instead
of the vector getting a new valid internal array.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D10853532
fbshipit-source-id: f6f22407f
Summary:
Now the domain can reason about `&` and `*` too. When recording `&`
between two locations also record a back-edge `*`, and vice-versa.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10509335
fbshipit-source-id: 8091b6ec0
Summary: This is more flexible and allows us to give more details when reporting.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10509336
fbshipit-source-id: 79c3ac1c8
Summary:
Invalidating addresses for destructors to catch use after destructor errors.
To pass ownership tests for use after destructor errors, we still need to:
(1) fix pointer arithmetic false positives
(2) add model for placement new to fix false positives
(3) add model for operator= to fix false positives
(4) support inter-procedural analysis for destructor_order_bad test
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D10450912
fbshipit-source-id: 2d9b1ee68
Summary:
Instead of the non-sensical piecewise join we had until now write
a proper one. Hopefully the comments explain what it does. Main one:
```
(* high-level idea: maintain some union-find data structure to identify locations in one heap
with locations in the other heap. Build the initial join state as follows:
- equate all locations that correspond to identical variables in both stacks, eg joining
stacks {x=1} and {x=2} adds "1=2" to the unification.
- add all addresses reachable from stack variables to the join state heap
This gives us an abstract state that is the union of both abstract states, but more states
can still be made equal. For instance, if 1 points to 3 in the first heap and 2 points to 4
in the second heap and we deduced "1 = 2" from the stacks already (as in the example just
above) then we can deduce "3 = 4". Proceed in this fashion until no more equalities are
discovered, and return the abstract state where a canonical representative has been chosen
consistently for each equivalence class (this is what the union-find data structure gives
us). *)
```
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10483978
fbshipit-source-id: f6ffd7528
Summary:
`Location` was clashing with the `Location` module, so use `Address`
instead.
When invalidating an address, remember the "actor" of its invalidation,
i.e. the access expression leading to the address and the source
location of the corresponding instruction.
When checking accesses, also pass the actor responsible for the access,
so that when we raise an error we know:
1. when and why a location was invalidated
2. when and why we tried to read it after that
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10446282
fbshipit-source-id: 3ca4fb3d4
Summary:
Model `x[y]` and `x.push_back(i)` to catch the classic bug of "take
reference inside vector, invalidate, then use again".
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D10445824
fbshipit-source-id: 21ffd9677
Summary:
Do the intersection of the heap and stack domains, and the union of the
invalid location sets. This forgets invalid locations that appear only
in one heap, unfortunately. We can start with this and improve later.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10445825
fbshipit-source-id: cc24460af
Summary:
New analysis in foetal form to detect invalid use of C++ objects after their
lifetime has ended. For now it has:
- A domain consisting of a graph of abstract locations representing the heap, a map from program variables to abstract locations representing the stack, and a set of locations known to be invalid (their lifetime has ended)
- The heap graph is unfolded lazily when we resolve accesses to the heap down to an abstract location. When we traverse a memory location we check that it's not known to be invalid.
- A simple transfer function reads and updates the stack and heap in a rudimentary way for now
- C++ `delete` is modeled as adding the location that its argument resolves to to the set of invalid locations
- Also, the domain has a really crappy join and widening for now (see comments in the code)
With this we already pass most of the "use after delete" tests from the
Ownership checker. The ones we don't pass are only because we are missing
models.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10383249
fbshipit-source-id: f414664cb
Jules Villard
Sungkeun Cho
Daiva Naudziuniene