Summary: It is now possible to push the thread status into each critical pair. This leads to higher precision, because when code branches on whether it is on the UI thread, the final abstract state of the procedure will be `AnyThread`, but pairs created in the UI thread branch should know that their status is `UIThread`, not `AnyThread`.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D18114273
fbshipit-source-id: cbb99b46f
Summary:
This diff avoids making top values on unknown non-static function,
such as abstract function, calls. This is necessary because the
generated top values ruin the precision of the cost checker.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17418611
fbshipit-source-id: aeb759bdd
Summary:
The wrong function was used when we tried to see if the class is
annotated with NullsafeStrict. This made it work only for non-static
methods.
Now we use the proper way.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D18113848
fbshipit-source-id: 02b7555be
Summary:
Previously, we considered a function which modifies its parameters to be impure even though it might not be modifying the underlying value. This resulted in FPs like the following program in Java:
```
void fresh_pure(int[] a) {
a = new int[1];
}
```
Similarly, in C++, we considered the following program as impure because it was writing to `s`:
```
Simple* reassign_pure(Simple* s) {
s = new Simple{2};
return s;
}
```
This diff fixes that issue by starting the check for address equivalnce in pre-post not directly from the addresses of the stack variables, but from the addresses pointed to by these stack variables. That means, we only consider things to be impure if the actual values pointed by the parameters change.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18113846
fbshipit-source-id: 3d7c712f3
Summary: We stop tracking at builder boundaries. Let's tract create methods as well so that trace is more informative.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D18038637
fbshipit-source-id: a99b6431f
Summary:
This is the first take on strict mode semantics.
The main invariant of strict mode is the following:
If the function passes `NullsafeStrict` check and its return value is
NOT annotated as Nullable, then the function does not indeed return
nulls, subject to unsoundness issues (which should either be fixed, or
should rarely happen in practice).
This invariant helps the caller in two ways:
1. Dangerous usages of non strict functions are visible, so the caller is enforced to check them (via assertions or conditions), or strictify them.
2. When the function is strict, the caller does not need to worry about
being defensive.
Biggest known issues so far:
1. Condition redundant and over-annotated warnings don't fully
respect strict mode, and this leads to stupid false positives. (There is
so much more stupid false positives in condition redundant anyway, so
not particularly a big deal for now).
2. Error reporting is not specific to mode. (E.g. we don't distinct real nullables and non-trusted non-nulls, which can be misleading). To be
improved as a follow up.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17978166
fbshipit-source-id: d6146ad71
Summary:
This is an intermediate nullability type powering future Strict mode.
See the next diff.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17977909
fbshipit-source-id: 2d5ab66d4
Summary:
Domain for thread-type. The main goals are
- Track code paths that are explicitly on UI thread (via annotations, or assertions).
- Maintain UI-thread-ness through the call stack (if a callee is on UI thread then the
trace any call site must be on the UI thread too).
- If we are not on the UI thread we assume we are on a background thread.
- Traces with "UI-thread" status cannot interleave but all other combinations can.
- We do not track other annotations (eg WorkerThread or AnyThread) as they can be
erroneously applied -- other checkers should catch those errors (annotation reachability).
- Top is AnyThread, and is used as the initial state for analysis.
Interestingly, by choosing the right strategy for choosing initial state and applying callee summaries gets rid of some false negatives in the tests even though we have not introduced any path sensitivity yet.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17929390
fbshipit-source-id: d72871034
Summary:
bigmacro_bender
There are 3 ways pulse tracks history. This is at least one too many. So
far, we have:
1. "histories": a humble list of "events" like "assigned here", "returned from call", ...
2. "interproc actions": a structured nesting of calls with a final "action", eg "f calls g calls h which does blah"
3. "traces", which combine one history with one interproc action
This diff gets rid of interproc actions and makes histories include
"nested" callee histories too. This allows pulse to track and display
how a value got assigned across function calls.
Traces are now more powerful and interleave histories and interproc
actions. This allows pulse to track how a value is fed into an action,
for instance performed in callee, which itself creates some more
(potentially now interprocedural) history before going to the next step
of the action (either another call or the action itself).
This gives much better traces, and some examples are added to showcase
this.
There are a lot of changes when applying summaries to keep track of
histories more accurately than was done before, but also a few
simplifications that give additional evidence that this is the right
concept.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17908942
fbshipit-source-id: 3b62eaf78
Summary:
Java method annotations are ambiguous in that there is no difference between
annotating the return value of a method, and annotating the method itself.
The disambiguation is done entirely based on the meaning of the annotation.
Here, while `UiThread`/`MainThread` are genuine method/class annotations
and not return annotations, the reverse is true for `ForUiThread`/`ForNonUiThread`.
This means that these latter annotations do not determine the thread status of
the method they are attached to.
Here we fix that misunderstanding.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17960994
fbshipit-source-id: 5aecfb124
Summary: As per title. These test pass already because the previous thread domain was sufficient to express them. This won't necessarily be true when the whole-program analysis version comes around, because we may decide to not report on the `Threaded` elements (see domain).
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D17930653
fbshipit-source-id: 2174f6b22
Summary:
Eventually thread status will be stored inside every critical pair so as to allow path sensitivity. That means that the status can no longer be a whole trace, as this will quickly become intractable, because each domain element would have to maintain its own trace as well as its own thread-status trace.
This is not great, as we lose information here, but I don't see any other way around it that is not super complicated/costly (sharing will be limited when moving from callee to caller).
Other diffs up the stack will clean up infrastructure no longer used meaningfully (ie models and domains).
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17908908
fbshipit-source-id: 3bf353e33
Summary:
Starvation is currently path insensitive. Two special cases of sensitivity cover a large range of useful cases:
- sensitivity on whether the current thread is a UI/background thread;
- sensitivity on whether a lock can be acquired (without blocking) or not.
We add a few tests capturing some of the false positives and negatives of the current analysis.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17907492
fbshipit-source-id: fbce896ac
Summary:
This diff adopts an array length evaluation function that is conservative. It is useful when our
domain cannot express length result precisely.
For example, suppose there is an array pointer `arr_locs` that may point to two arrays `a` and `b`,
and their lengths are `a.length` and `b.length` (symbols), respectively. Using the usual
evaluation, our current domain cannot express `a.length join b.length` (join of two symbolic
values), so it returns top.
In this case, we can use the conservative function intead. It evaluates the length as `[0,
a.length.ub + b.length.ub]`, since we know every array length is positive. The result is not
precise, but better than top.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17908859
fbshipit-source-id: 7c0b1591b
Summary:
Let's add basic Java support to impurity checker. Since impurity checker relies on pulse, we need to add Java with Pulse callback as well. Pulse doesn't officially support Java yet, but we can enable it for impurity checker for now.
Many Java primitives/operations are not yet modeled (such as creation of new objects, support for collections etc.). Still, it is good to run impurity checker on the existing tests of the purity checker. Also, it is nice to see that we can identify most of the impure functions correctly in the purity dir. There are a lot of FNs though.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17906237
fbshipit-source-id: 15308d285
Summary:
This diff introduces inequality for the iterator alias target, as we
did for the size target before.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17879208
fbshipit-source-id: cc2f6a723
Summary:
This diff revises the semantics of hasNext model to add the lengths of
arrays, rather than join them to top.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17882388
fbshipit-source-id: f5edaedb3
Summary:
[androidx.collection.SimpleArrayMap](https://developer.android.com/reference/androidx/collection/SimpleArrayMap.html) also has `keySet` and `entrySet` methods which make them eligible for inefficient keyset checker. Let's add it.
Title
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17831594
fbshipit-source-id: 32e831e18
Summary:
The current usage has several issues reducing code maintainability and
readability:
1. Null_field_access was misleading: it was used for checking accesing
to arrays as well!
2. But actually, when checking access to array via `length`, we sometimes
pretended it is a field access (hence very tricky code in rendering the
error).
3. "Call receiver consistency" is unclear name, was not obvious that it is all about
calling a method in an object.
Let's also consolidate code.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17789618
fbshipit-source-id: 9b0f58c9c
Summary: Before, we didn't track litho framework callees on client code which was wrong. Now, we replace this with the following: If the callee is `build()` itself or doesn't contain a `build()` in its summary, then we want to track it in the domain. The former makes sense since we always want to track `build()` methods. The latter also makes sense since such a method could be a setter for a prop (as in the case of `prop1` in `buildPropLithoOK` which we were missing before due to the imprecise heuristic that prevented picking up callees in litho).
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17810704
fbshipit-source-id: 87d88e921
Summary: As a heuristic, litho library calls on non-litho callers are not tracked. This is very imprecise and results in FPs and FNs as exemplified by newly added tests. Instead, we should check to see if the summary contains a `build()` method as will be done in the next diff. This diff adds these tests and refactors the test code.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17809536
fbshipit-source-id: 6dff1868c
Summary:
Improve the trace by incorporating the callees and their locations in the call chain (i.e. chain of methods starting from `build()` call)
- extend the domain to contain the callee location
- replace the test results with the new traces
This makes our job much easier to debug FPs in a big codebase.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17788996
fbshipit-source-id: 31938b5fe
Summary: `litho` checker contained two checkers: required-props and graphQL field accesses. Although they use the same domain, their reporting conditions and analysis details are different. However, they were bundled into the same analysis by adding disjunctions to `exec_instr` to handle both cases. Let's separate them into two different checkers, keeping a modular transfer function and analyzer that is reused by these two checkers.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D17788834
fbshipit-source-id: 47d77063b
Summary:
At some point it was thought that we can assume that any annotation starting with "On" means the method is on the UI thread.
That's too imprecise and has led to false positives and negatives. Restrict to a well-known safe set.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17769376
fbshipit-source-id: 0f8fee059
Summary:
This diff tries to narrowing the fixpoint of outermost loops, so that over-approximated widened values do not flow to the following code.
Problem: There are two phases for finding a fixpoint, widening and narrowing. First, it finds a fixpoint with widening, in function level. After that, it finds a fixpoint with narrowing. A problem is that sometimes an overly-approximated, imprecise, values by widening are flowed to the following loops. They are hard to narrow in the narrowing phase because there is a cycle preventing it.
To mitigate the problem, it tries to do narrowing, in loop level, right after it found a fixpoint of a loop. Thus, it narrows before the widened values are flowed to the following loops. In order to guarantee the termination of the analysis, this eager narrowing is applied only to the outermost loops.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17740265
fbshipit-source-id: e2d454036
Summary:
This diff extends the alias domain to analyze loop with list comprehensions form in Java precisely.
```
list2 = new List();
for (Element e : list1) {
list2.add(e);
}
```
1. `IteratorOffset` is a relation between a iterator offset and a length of another array. For example, in the above example, after n-times of iterations, the offset of the iterator (if it exists) and the length of `list2` are the same as `n`.
2. `IteratorHasNext` is a relation between iterator and its `hasNext` result.
3. At the conditional nodes, it prunes the alias list length of `list2` by that of `list1`.
* if `hasNext(list1's iterator)` is true, `list2`'s length is pruned by `< list1's length`
* if `hasNext(list1's iterator)` is false, `list2`'s length is pruned by `= list1's length`
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17667128
fbshipit-source-id: 41fb23a45
Summary:
The old domain keeps two sets:
- `events` are things (including lock acquisitions) which eventually happen during the execution of a procedure.
- `order` are pairs of `(lock, event)` such that there is a trace through the procedure which at some point acquires `lock` and before releasing it performs `event`.
A deadlock would be reported if for two procedures, `(lock1,lock2)` is in `order` of procedure 1 and `(lock2,lock1)` is in `order` of procedure 2. This condition/domain allowed for the false positive fixed in the tests, as well as was unwieldy, because it required translating between the two sets.
The new domain has only one set of "critical pairs" `(locks, event)` such that there is a trace where `event` occurs, and *right before it occurs* the locks held are exactly `locks` (no over/under approximation). This allows keeping all information in one set, simplifies the procedure call handling and eliminates the known false positive.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17686944
fbshipit-source-id: 3c68bb957
Summary: Holding a master lock and then acquiring two other locks inside can generate a false positive as shown.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17710076
fbshipit-source-id: 5bc910ba2
Summary:
Previously deduplication was always on which is not great for testing.
Also split tests so that we can still test deduplication separately.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17686877
fbshipit-source-id: 280d91473
Summary:
Ideally the analyser should equate locks `this.x.f` and `a.x.f` in different methods if they can alias.
The heuristic removed here was rarely used and is in the way of a re-write of the analysis.
It was also badly implemented, as this should ideally be the comparison relation of `Lock`.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D17602827
fbshipit-source-id: 4f4576c1a
Summary:
This diff generates a symbolic value when a function returns only
exceptions. Previously, the exception expression is evaluated to top,
thus it was propagated to other functions, which made those costs as
top. For preventing that situation, this diff changed:
* exception expressions are evaluated to bottom, and
* if callee's return value is bottom, it generates a symbolic value
for it.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17500386
fbshipit-source-id: 0fdcc710d
Summary: This diff introduces an inequality for the size alias targets, in order to get preciser array lengths after loops. The alias domain in inferbo was able to express strict equality between alias source and its targets, e.g. x=size(array). Now, for the size alias target, it can express less than or equal relations, e.g. x>=size(array).
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17606222
fbshipit-source-id: 2557d3bd0
Summary: Component.Builder has its own non-required props that are inherited by the MyComponent.Builder. Add tests where these common props are set in the chain of calls.
Reviewed By: Katalune
Differential Revision: D17710294
fbshipit-source-id: f3c5ef28c
Summary: `Prop(varArg = myProp) List <?> myPropList` can also be set via `myPropList()` or `myProp()`. Add support for picking up the `varArg` and checking this form of required props.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17571997
fbshipit-source-id: 7956cb972
Summary:
Turns out, we did not have such a test in place.
Known issue: we report over-annotated warnings for each fields N times,
one per constructor, which is wrong.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17574791
fbshipit-source-id: def992691
Summary:
This diff avoids giving the top value to unknown globals in Java,
because they harm precision of the cost checker. Instead, it doesn't
subst the global symbols at function calls.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17498714
fbshipit-source-id: d1215b3aa
Summary:
This diff adds an eval mode for the substitutions of the cost results, in order to avoid precision
loss by joining two symbols.
The usual join of two different symbolic values, `s1` and `s2`, becomes top due to the limitation of
our domain. On the other hand, in the new eval mode, it returns an upperbound `s1+s2`, because the
cost values only care about the upperbounds.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17573400
fbshipit-source-id: 2c84743d5
Summary:
This continues work for eliminating Annot.Item.t from Nullsafe low-level
code.
The introduced function `from_nullsafe_type` is called when we infer
initial type of the equation based on the function or field formal signature.
Before that, we did it via reading the annotation directly, which
complicates the logic and making introducing Unknown nullability tricky.
## Clarifying the semantics of PropagatesNullable
This diff also clarifies (and changes) the behavior of PropagatesNullable params.
Previously, if the return value of a function that has PropagatesNullable params was
annotated as Nullable, nullsafe was effectively ignoring PropagatesNullable effect.
This is especially bad because one can add Nullable annotation based on the logic "if the function can return `null`, it should be annotated with Nullable`.
In the new design, there is no possibility for such a misuse: the code that
applies the rule "any param is PropagatesNullable hence the return
value is nullable even if not explicitly annotated" lives in NullsafeType.ml, so
this will be automatically taken into account.
Meaning that now we implicitly deduce Nullable annotation for the return value, and providing it explicitly as an alternative that does not change the effect.
In the future, we might consider annotating the return value with `Nullable` explicit.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17479157
fbshipit-source-id: 66c2c8777
Summary:
In the cost checker, the range of selected control variables are used to estimate the number of loop iteration. However, sometimes the ranges of control variables are not related to how many times the loop iteration. This diff strengthens the condition for them as:
1. integers from `size` models
2. integers constructed from `+` or `-`
3. integers constructed from `*`
For the last one, the loop iteration is likely to be log scale of the range of the control variable:
```
while (i < c) {
i *= 2;
}
```
We will address this in the future.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17365796
fbshipit-source-id: c1e709ae8
Summary: Our annotation parameter parsing is too primitive to identify `resType` and before we only assumed that all Prop's can be set by any of the two suffixes: `Attr` and `Res`. After talking to Litho team, there is 3 more additions to these suffixes: `Dip`, `Sip`, and `Px`.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17528482
fbshipit-source-id: 8d7f49130
Summary: Before, we were mistakenly checking any annotation that ends with Prop such as TreeProp. This was wrong. Instead, we should only check Prop as adviced by the Litho team.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17527769
fbshipit-source-id: b753dd87a
Summary:
`ModeledRange` represents how many times the interval value can be updated by modeled functions. This
domain is to support the case where there are mismatches between value of a control variable and
actual number of loop iterations. For example,
```
while((c = file_channel.read(buf)) != -1) { ... }
```
the loop will iterates as the file size, but the control variable `c` does not have that value. In
these cases, it assigns a symbolic value of the file size to the modeled range of `c`, then which
is used when calculating the overall cost.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17476621
fbshipit-source-id: 9a81376e8
Summary:
This diff extends the `Simple` alias domain to address Java's
temporary variables better. It now has an additional field to denote
an alias temporary variable.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17421907
fbshipit-source-id: 8b8b47461
Summary:
D17397144 adds dedicated tests for condition redundant.
We also have tests for overannotated methods.
This makes these test cases redundant. Let's not pollute the results.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17398757
fbshipit-source-id: 10f6beeca
Summary:
This will simplify modifying functionality around this type of error.
Also rename the file for clarity.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17397144
fbshipit-source-id: 552215243
Summary:
This diff revises widening functions of bounds that have a linear form and a min/max form.
For example, for lower bounds,
* 3 ▽ (1+min(2, x)) = (1+min(2, x))
* 3+x ▽ (3+min(2, x)) = (3+min(2, x))
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17420786
fbshipit-source-id: ff9eebed3
Summary:
This diff addresses collection adds in loop. For example,
```
ArrayList<...> a = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
a.add(...);
}
// we want to know the size of `a` here!
```
This is a common pattern on initializing a collection in Java.
How we did: Instead of adopting general (but complicated) solutions such as relational domain, we
extended the current alias domain of inferbo, to be able to handle this specific case:
* An array `a` should have size 0, at the entry of the loop.
* The iterating variable `i` should start with 0.
* `add` should be called once inside the loop.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D17319350
fbshipit-source-id: 99b6acae1
Summary:
In D17156724, we forked nullsafe tests, which was a strategy to
introduce nullsafe-gradual mode back then.
The reason was "gradual" mode is a pretty big change in a way Infer
handles annotations, so we wanted to tests both scenarios: gradual and
non-gradual mode.
The plan was to deprecate "non-gradual" tests at some point, hence we
decided to go with duplication.
Now we have a better approach to ensure "gradual" features are well
covered. The approach is the following.
1. [Mostly finished] Improve existings tests so that they cover negative and positive
cases. With this, we can safely add something like
--non-annotated-default UNKNOWN_NULLABILITY to the test config and be sure tests still make
sense (i.e. don't pass simply because annotations don't make sense
anymore)
2. [In progress]. Refactor nullsafe code so that instead of using of Annot.ml everywhere we use a special abstraction telling if the class is annotated with Nullable, Nonnull, or not annotated. With this change, we essenstially have a single place we need to test, which removes the need to have 2 pair of tests for each feature.
3. [To be done]. Introduce Uknown nullability and add small number of tests specifically
for that feature (together with existing tests).
NOTE: I did not rename `nullsafe-default` back to `nullsafe` to not
pollute blame without need.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17395743
fbshipit-source-id: 3d3e062f6
Summary:
Get rid of helper class `C`, normal Object serves the same goal well
Don't return values from a function, focus only on nullable
dereferences.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17314569
fbshipit-source-id: d70e66b5f
Summary:
1. Split into 3 subclasses for 3 major set of features we test
2. Document a known FP
3. More clear names
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17285902
fbshipit-source-id: 66e3b5668
Summary:
Let's consolidate "positive" and "negative" cased together by adding an example
of not annotated class as a source of "negative" cases.
Also join the case with modelled methods to the same class.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D17284101
fbshipit-source-id: e15e60691
Summary:
There are currently plenty of ways to suppress the warning, including Inject, Initializer, and SuppressFieldNotInitialized annotations.
This one (annotating field with Nonnull) is counter-intuitive and does not align with gradual nullsafe
semantics we are working on.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17281702
fbshipit-source-id: 132e1b687
Summary:
This diff ignores character symbols in the cost results, in order to
avoid FPs from parser code.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17132053
fbshipit-source-id: d9cf8bd26
Summary: let's always have positive and negative case for each feature we test
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17206785
fbshipit-source-id: 5791ace48
Summary:
1. Let's move it to the file dedicated to this particular warning.
2. Make it more general (Activity was just a particular case) and describe in comments what it really does.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17205919
fbshipit-source-id: 82bf5e9bd
Summary:
1. Remove boilerplate with builder that uses builder initializer; it
demostates a usecase but it is not really relevant for the test so it
distracts attention.
Instead, describe the usecase in the comment
2. Add good and bad cases so it is obvious what exactly do we test.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17204969
fbshipit-source-id: 005ea078b
Summary:
Let's combine with the one that tests a very similar thing for known
cleanup methods
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17204206
fbshipit-source-id: dbdbde903
Summary:
1. Remove manipulations with "shadowed" fields and abstract class, I don't believe they produced high quality signal (and no related warnings in the test output).
2. For each failure case provide corresponding success case and the
reverse
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17203240
fbshipit-source-id: c809857ed
Summary:
1. Let's make the intention of the test more visible, also let's provide an example
when the error does occur.
2. `onDestroy` silence "field not nullable" warnigs not only for `View`, but for any objects, so let's use `String` (as an example of a trivial object) instead.
Original diff that introduced the test: D10024458
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D17202839
fbshipit-source-id: 037d937e4
Summary: This diff adds models of Java String. In order to keep the precision of cost checker, I fixed cost models for String in this diff too.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17203309
fbshipit-source-id: 8cc2814fc
Summary:
See motivation below.
This diff is dealing with FieldNotNullable:
- move not relevant subclasses into dedicated classes and files
- modify the tests so they comply with the standards below
--Motivation--
Gradual mode we are going to introduce is an invasive change in how Infer
treats nullability semantics.
In order to make the change in a controllable way, we need the tests to comply with the
following standards and conventions.
1. For each code peace where we expect a bug to happen, the there should be
corresponding (minimally different from above) peace of code where we expect a bug to NOT happen. (This is to ensure bug is happening for exact reason we think it is happening).
2. Conversely: for each peace of code where we expect a bug to be NOT
present, there shuold be a peace of code where the bug IS happening.
(Otherwise there can be too many reasons for a bug NOT to happen).
3. Convention: end corresponding methods IsOK and IsBUG correspondingly.
4. Keep code examples as small as possible.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17183222
fbshipit-source-id: 83d03e67f
Summary:
In next diff, we are going to introduce a new mode of nullsafe
(gradual). For testing, we are going to employ the strategy used by jvillard
for Pulse.
In this diff we split tests into two subfolders, one for the default and one for the gradual
mode.
We are planning to make the gradual mode default eventually. For that, most
new features will make sense for gradual mode, and we will mostly evolve
tests for that mode.
As for 'default' mode, we need to preserve tests mostly to ensure we don't introduce
regressions.
Occasionally, we might make changes that make sense for both modes, in
this (expected relatively rare) cases we will make changes to both set
of tests.
An alternative strategy would be to have two sets of issues.exp files,
one for gradual and one for default mode. This has an advantage of each
java file to be always tested twice, but disadvantage is that it will be
harder to write meaningful test code so that it makes sense for both
modes simultaneously.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17156724
fbshipit-source-id: a92a9208f
Summary:
`Present` annotation was an experiment made many years ago that never
got into real usage. The idea was to annotate Optional<> types with
Present, which means that it is safe to call get().
We don't plan to support `Present` annotation for optional types in the
near future.
Support of `Present` annotation requires extra levels of abstraction
that make the changing the behavior and introducing new features harder.
A lot of checks for nullability are written in generic way so they also
check for presense.
Getting rid of that will allow us to simplify our
work for introducing new semantics for nullsafe.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D17153432
fbshipit-source-id: c5ea9bdf1
Summary:
Since it does not make sense to get ranges of non-integer values and
use them as approximate iteration numbers, this diff ignores control
values that only contain non-integer symbols.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D17130967
fbshipit-source-id: f5ba58d52
Summary: This diff extends size alias domain for keeping one more alias of a Java temporary variable.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16984082
fbshipit-source-id: 244bbd0ee
Summary:
The purpose of DefinitelyNotNullable currently is bit unclear; let's
rename it so that the intention is obvious.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D16984529
fbshipit-source-id: 696d58315
Summary:
`nullsafe` currently allows the following:
```
public void Nonnull Object willBeOK() { return null; }
```
But disallows the following:
```
public void Object willBeAnIssue() { return null; }
```
This was a deliberate choice made back in 2014.
The motivation was to provide a way to tell the checker "I know it can not be null, trust me".
A huge problem with that approach is that it is extremely non-intuitive and surprising, and contradicts with pretty much everything when Nonnull or similar annotations are used in external world.
This is not the way how checkers should be supressed.
We do provide 2 options to express this intention, namely `assertNotNull` and `assumeNotNull` would do the thing.
This is a much better approach for additional reason: assertNotNull is
granular and applies only to the exact expression that is under
question. In contrast, suppressing the check on the whole function level
make any modifications of a function dangerous.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D16984213
fbshipit-source-id: 0ba0f623b
Summary: This diff prunes array sizes in Java by adding the size alias on the `get_array_length` function calls.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16983501
fbshipit-source-id: a924af09d
Summary:
It prunes the size of collections when the size function is called in the condition expression. The diff extended the alias domain to understand temporary variables of SIL from Java.
Depends on D16761461
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16761611
fbshipit-source-id: 849c5c71c
Summary:
It revises Java's cast model to keep type in the location when it has a field.
The type information is useful especially when generating ondemand values of Collection elements.
Depends on D16807299
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16807378
fbshipit-source-id: 636e54429
Summary: Ideally, we should be able to handle them like pruning if statements but for now, let's add the test.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16938842
fbshipit-source-id: 04fae9559
Summary:
Since it is non-sense to get ranges of boolean values, this diff
ignores control values that only contain boolean symbols.
Depends on D16804802
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16804808
fbshipit-source-id: ccb25db4d
Summary: Functions with empty body have unit cost, not zero. The unit cost comes from the start node.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16855642
fbshipit-source-id: 6b5181faf
Summary:
Before this diff it returned `[0,size-1]`, but which became bottom
when size was given by 0. As a result, it made the both branches of
`if(iterator.hasNext())` unreachable. Similarly, if the size was 1,
it only visited the false branch of the if condition because the
condition value was `[0,0]` at that time.
This diff changes it to return `[0,size]`, so that
* the false branch is reachable when the size is 0
* the both branches are reachable when the size is 1
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16803000
fbshipit-source-id: f8772be27
Summary: We want to keep big O notation as simple as possible in cost analysis reports (especially in diff time). Therefore, let's not show constants/min/max in big O notations even though the resulting asymptotic bound might be inaccurate. Developers can click on the trace and see the actual cost.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16731351
fbshipit-source-id: 2e16f7eca
Summary: In order to test changes to bigO notation, let's record them in test results.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16763972
fbshipit-source-id: c1376909b
Summary:
Correct the models of ArrayList initialization. Basically, there are two ways to initialize:
- by setting an initial capacity, which creates an empty list
- by passing another collection as an argument
Before, we had only modeled the second case which was resulting in wrong memory model for the first case. This diff fixes that.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16711055
fbshipit-source-id: e82faf191
Summary: Models of Java's Collection mistakenly assumed that there was an argument for empty set whereas `Collections.emptySet()` doesn't have any actuals. This diff fixes that an also removes the type argument from the corresponding model definition.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16582314
fbshipit-source-id: d4304dc60
Summary:
The `represents_multiple_values` flag was adopted to decide whether updating abstract value strongly or weakly. However, the flag was included in the `Val` domain, which is strange, because it is a property of abstract locations, rather than abstract values. This makes the behavior of memory update function depend on the abstract value to update, making its code complicated.
This diff detach the `represents_multiple_values` flag from the `Value` domain, thus the memory update does not depend on the abstract value. Since this is a refactoring, I believe the diff should not make many semantic changes.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D16441734
fbshipit-source-id: 4c10779d7
Summary:
The domain supported path sensitivity wrt to a specific boolean guard `Branch.unlikely`. This isn't used in actual code, so remove it.
Also
- add an .mli to the domain;
- unabbreviate domain name to match analyser name;
- use Payload.read instead of calling Ondemand directly;
- adjust tests.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D16203953
fbshipit-source-id: 743aa4400
Summary:
Move annotation reachability tests to their own directory.
Clean up and complete the tests.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D16201387
fbshipit-source-id: 8a87a25b7
Summary:
Treat `MainThread` and `WorkerThread` annotations.
Fix wrong test (`AnyThread` cannot call a UI-only method, because it can be called by ANY thread ;) ) See https://developer.android.com/reference/android/support/annotation/AnyThread
Clean up the code a bit.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D16183798
fbshipit-source-id: 6b7e3b27e
Summary: There were FNs caused by only looking for the immediate predecessors when we were checking the pattern. This diff heuristically chases 4 more predecessors to reduce the number of FNs.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16149983
fbshipit-source-id: f65c57a0a
Summary: Adding typechecks to prevent potential FPs like the added test
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D16149511
fbshipit-source-id: 6d3fe0ad4
Sungkeun Cho
Nikos Gorogiannis
Mitya Lyubarskiy
Ezgi Çiçek
Jules Villard