Summary:
Getting this right will be long and complex so for now the easiest is to
underreport and only consider as invalid the addresses we know to be invalid on
both sides of a join. In fact the condition for an address to be invalid after
a join is more complex than this: it is invalid only if *all* the addresses in
its equivalence class as discovered by the join are invalid.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D12823925
fbshipit-source-id: 2ca109356
Summary:
Turns out once a vector array became invalid it stayed that way, instead
of the vector getting a new valid internal array.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D10853532
fbshipit-source-id: f6f22407f
Summary:
Now the domain can reason about `&` and `*` too. When recording `&`
between two locations also record a back-edge `*`, and vice-versa.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10509335
fbshipit-source-id: 8091b6ec0
Summary:
Model `x[y]` and `x.push_back(i)` to catch the classic bug of "take
reference inside vector, invalidate, then use again".
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D10445824
fbshipit-source-id: 21ffd9677
Summary:
New analysis in foetal form to detect invalid use of C++ objects after their
lifetime has ended. For now it has:
- A domain consisting of a graph of abstract locations representing the heap, a map from program variables to abstract locations representing the stack, and a set of locations known to be invalid (their lifetime has ended)
- The heap graph is unfolded lazily when we resolve accesses to the heap down to an abstract location. When we traverse a memory location we check that it's not known to be invalid.
- A simple transfer function reads and updates the stack and heap in a rudimentary way for now
- C++ `delete` is modeled as adding the location that its argument resolves to to the set of invalid locations
- Also, the domain has a really crappy join and widening for now (see comments in the code)
With this we already pass most of the "use after delete" tests from the
Ownership checker. The ones we don't pass are only because we are missing
models.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10383249
fbshipit-source-id: f414664cb
Jules Villard