Summary: We had a special case for fixing false positives on constexpr implicitly captured by lambdas. However, we do not report dead stores on constexpr anymore, hence, do not need the special case anymore. Moreover, the special case was not only capturing constexpr in lambdas, but also any variables which type had `const` (see new test `capture_const_bad` which was not being reported before this diff)
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9654848
fbshipit-source-id: 882fd2804
Summary: We report dead store false positives in template arguments when constexpr is used. To remove the false positives, with the expense of some false negatives, we do not report dead stores on constexpr anymore.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9608095
fbshipit-source-id: 91b0c71c4
Summary:
Lambdas can capture references to locals of the enclosing method as long as
they are not propagated outside the method. However to keep things simple
always allow them to capture locals of the enclosing method at the price of
some false negatives.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D8974434
fbshipit-source-id: 957ae44bd
Summary: C++17 introduce guaranteed copy elision which omits constructor calls. In ownership analysis, we depended on these constructor calls to acquire ownership. In particular, when a method returns struct, previously, a constructor was used to acquire ownership. In this diff, we acquire ownership of the returned structs directly.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9244302
fbshipit-source-id: ae8261b99
Summary: Errors that include temporary variables are difficult to understand. Do not report stack variable address escape on temporary variables.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D9117517
fbshipit-source-id: 9ebd75ecc
Summary: Exceptional successors were not meant to be created for return nodes, but they were created if try block had a single return statement.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D8913371
fbshipit-source-id: 6ac85b21d
Summary:
Do no computation of stability abstract state if not explicitly requested via the command line flag.
Also, simplify the reporting.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D8614885
fbshipit-source-id: 25dd9de
Summary:
The addresses of global variables do not need initialisation to exist and be valid as they are part of the code or data segment of the program. This means that taking the address of a global is not in itself a danger for SIOF. However, dereferencing such an address would be. In order to avoid false positives but avoid being too unsound, only ignore them when the address is taken only to set another global. The general case would require a more complicated abstract domain.
Fixes#866
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D8055627
fbshipit-source-id: 92307b2
Summary:
These just point to expressions that we know how to translate.
Fixes#950
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8713784
fbshipit-source-id: 9eafa39
Summary:
- Do not add actuals of a call as unstable.
- Replace access trie with simple set of paths, which is easier to debug/argue correct.
- Fix bug where a prefix path was searched, as opposed to a *proper* prefix.
- Restrict interface to the minimum so that alternative implementations are easier.
Reviewed By: ilyasergey
Differential Revision: D8573792
fbshipit-source-id: 4c4e174
Summary: C/C++ code can, in some cases, generate a large number of temporary (Sil) variables. Since we are already not reporting races on these, not recording them gives some perf back.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz, jvillard
Differential Revision: D8566999
fbshipit-source-id: 148ac46
Summary: We were missing reads of `a` if it was used in void cast, i.e. `(void) a;` This caused dead store false positives: we were not using `exp` that was the result of translating `a`. This diff creates a call to built-in skip function with `exp` as its argument, which causes the analyses to see reads of `exp`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8332092
fbshipit-source-id: f3b0e10
Summary: There is a number of dangling pointer dereference false positives coming from our treatment of union in c/cpp. For now, do not treat union fields as uninitialised.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8279802
fbshipit-source-id: a339b0e
Summary: We get a lot of false positives for union types as union fields are treated as separate memory locations at the moment. For now we do not treat union fields as uninitialised.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D8277363
fbshipit-source-id: efe5b4a
Mehdi Bouaziz
Julian Sutherland
Dino Distefano
Daiva Naudziuniene
Jules Villard
Ezgi Çiçek
Martino Luca
Kai Yang
Nikos Gorogiannis
Dulma Churchill