Summary:public
Improved/simplified framework for fronend checkers.
Now we have a unique hook from cTrans to run checkers on statements and a unique
hook from cFrontent to run checkers on declarations.
So now when adding a checker we don't have to modify cTrans/cFrontend.
Moreover made more sistematic the way checkers are invoked. This simplify the definition
of checkers and the way we use them.
Code is now simpler.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D2976589
fb-gh-sync-id: fbe22d4
shipit-source-id: fbe22d4
Summary:
public This continues the work on adding builtins for getters and setters
and removing the generated code from the frontend. This is extending it to setters and
removing the preanalysis that is no longer needed.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D2734499
fb-gh-sync-id: 7cf5749
Summary: public
We were generating getters and setters in the frontend, and then removing them if they were not needed
in the preanalysis. This diff adds a builtin getter that gets called if we are going to skip the function. That
means, if there was a getter written by the developers we still use that one rather than the builtin.
Code for setter and cleanup of preanalysis will come in a next diff.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D2702890
fb-gh-sync-id: d65f25e
Summary: public Make it uniform with other function call translations. This is just reordering, no functional change intended
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D2696370
fb-gh-sync-id: 63656e3
Summary: public
Using clang's method resolution. This means that, in method calls, clang gives you a pointer to the declaration of the method.
In some cases though, clang doesn't find the right method. For example, when it finds a method in a category, we
need to make it into a method in the corresponding class, because that's how we treat categories in Infer. Moreover,
when it finds a method in a protocol, that is not useful for us, since the implementation will be in some class. Finally,
sometimes the call is on an object of type id, in which case clang doesn't know what is the correct declaration. In
those cases, we fall back to what we were doing before of approximating the method resolution. We also refactor
some of the code.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D2679766
fb-gh-sync-id: b79bb85
Summary:
each procedure has a different scope, so we can restart the fresh name generator and have more stable instructions in the cfg, that don't change when other procedures are changed
Summary:
@public
The clang location information is described in an incremental way: each location information is a delta with respect to the previous one in the AST. This is based on a the visit of the AST nodes which corresponds to the order in which the lines are printed with the standard clang AST dump:
clang -cc1 -ast-dump filename.c
This diff adds a preprocessing phase to the front-end so that location information is composed during a visit, and explicit location information is used instead.
In the case of include files, we report the last known location before including the file.
The current file for a function is the file where it is defined. So if a function is entirely defined in a .h file, then the location information will consistently be about the .h file. If instead a function is defined in the source file being analyzed, and some AST nodes come from macro expansion, line information will refer to the original file.
The front-end tests reveal that the location information was incorrect in a few dot files.
Test Plan: arc unit, after having fixed the wrong location in the existing .dot files