Summary:
Multiplication by a constant is primitive in the linear arithmetic
solver, while general multiplication is not, so for clarity and
predictability, use constants where possible.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21721020
fbshipit-source-id: 3497d06c9
Summary:
It is suboptimal for `Sh` to destruct terms with detailed knowledge of
their representation. So add `Term.const_of` to obtain the constant
summand of a polynomial term.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21721022
fbshipit-source-id: 4af858896
Summary:
It is suboptimal for `Sh` to destruct terms with detailed knowledge of
their representation. So add `Term.d_int` to destruct an integer term.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21721024
fbshipit-source-id: 5f13794b6
Summary:
It is suboptimal for `Sh` to destruct terms with detailed knowledge of
their representation. So add `Term.disjuncts` to obtain the toplevel
disjuncts of a term.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21721016
fbshipit-source-id: 809da9b1b
Summary:
It has no dependencies on the rest of the sledge codebase and might be
more generally useful.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21720980
fbshipit-source-id: b4f061e73
Summary:
Now that the frontend translates LLVM's undef to nondet instructions,
not expressions, Nondet in Exp and Term are not needed.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21720969
fbshipit-source-id: e8acaf432
Summary:
Instead of relying on Exp.nondet to encode the semantics of LLVM's
undef, translate each to a per-function unique register, with a nondet
assignment to it prior to each use. This avoids the need for
Exp.nondet, which is ill-formed in the sense that expressions denote
values, not sets of values (with particular constraints on what ways
in which the choice must be angelic vs demonic). This change
essentially allows the backend to be sane, and makes it the frontend's
problem to deal with LLVM's undef.
This treatment, like the treatment based on Exp.nondet, is expected to
result in LLAIR code with different semantics of undef compared to the
semantics of LLVM described in the
[LangRef](https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#undefined-values). In
particular, the LLVM LangRef states
> An ‘undef’ “variable” can arbitrarily change its value over its
> “live range”. This is true because the variable doesn’t actually
> have a live range. Instead, the value is logically read from
> arbitrary registers that happen to be around when needed, so the
> value is not necessarily consistent over time.
To model this ability of undef to arbitrarily change its value over
its live range, it is likely that additional nondet assignments would
need to be added. Exactly where it not currently known.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21720976
fbshipit-source-id: 90c2a0d26
Summary:
Refactor frontend translation of LLVM values, opcodes, etc. to support
emitting not only a LLAIR expression, but also a sequence of
instructions to be prefixed onto the uses of the resulting expression.
This is currently unused, as all prefixes are empty. Later, it will be
used to translate e.g. `undef` to `r := nondet(); r`.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21720972
fbshipit-source-id: b89bb57de
Summary:
Refer to Llair modules using `Llair.` qualifier, except for in
`Frontend`, which makes so much use of `Llair` that it is now opened
(`Llair` only contains types and modules, so `open` is safe).
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21720979
fbshipit-source-id: dd42075d9
Summary:
The term representing an exp should not rely on more info than is
carried by the exp.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21720989
fbshipit-source-id: b65bf3678
Summary:
It is now possible to not spew dune files all over the repo, and opam
files aren't needed either.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21720978
fbshipit-source-id: 553e1d154
Summary:
```
val ( let@ ) : ('a -> 'b) -> 'a -> 'b
(** [let@ x = e in b] is equivalent to [e @@ fun x -> b], that is,
[e (fun x -> b)] *)
```
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21721025
fbshipit-source-id: d8efdebbe
Summary:
Rather than compute the size of the llair type of the llair
initializer expression, compute the size of the llvm initializer
directly.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21720982
fbshipit-source-id: 4364baf38
Summary:
Rather than translate an llvm type to a llair one and then compute the
size of the llair type, obtain the size of the llvm type directly.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21720968
fbshipit-source-id: ad98112a7
Summary:
In LLVM it is possible for struct constant values to be directly
recursive, with no pointer dereference to close the cycle. These
appear for example as the values of vtables from C++ code.
Currently such recursive records in the Exp and Term languages are
represented as genuinely cyclic values. Compared to a standard term
representation, the presence of cyclic values is a significant
complication everywhere. Since the backend solver does not do anything
such as induction over these, they have to be treated as essentially
atomic.
This patch changes the representation to a standard non-recursive tree
term structure. Instead of cyclic references, an explicit constructor
is added for the "non-tree edges", which simply indicates which
ancestor record value to which the recursive reference points.
There is a potential issue with this representation, since for
mutually recursive records, the representation is not canonical: it
chooses one of the records in the cycle to start from and expresses
the cycles relative to that. Currently the choice of representation is
dictated by the frontend. For the case of vtables, the frontend
translates globals in the same order they appear in the LLVM IR, so
the representation choice is fixed.
It may turn out that other potential uses require more reasoning
support in the backend solver, which would involve a theory of
equality of record values induced by equating the representations
resulting from different rotations of the cycle of records.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21441533
fbshipit-source-id: 0c5a11378
Summary:
Having `val size_of : Typ.t -> t` in the signature of `Term` and `val
size_of : t -> t` in the signature of `Exp` gives the impression that
`Term` and `Exp` know something about `Typ`. But they don't, those
functions are only trivial convenience wrappers, and only have a few
uses, so just inline them to clarify that it is `Typ` that knows about
the sizes of types.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21441535
fbshipit-source-id: 09b135a8c
Summary:
Should have been included in:
22cbec493 [sledge] Rename contexts/profiles to be more conventional
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21441538
fbshipit-source-id: 92b591171
Summary:
Dune does not track the ocamlformat binary as a dependency of the
`fmt` rules, so when testing or upgrading ocamlformat, the existing
`fmt` target is not reliable.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D21441539
fbshipit-source-id: 40bea4447
Summary:
Add a path condition to each symbolic state, represented in sledge's arithmetic domain. This gives a precise account of arithmetic constraints. In particular, it is relation and thus is more robust in the face of inter-procedural analysis.
This is gated behind a flag for now as there are performance issues with the new arithmetic.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D20393947
fbshipit-source-id: b780de22a
Summary:
Show that the SSA restrictions imply that the blocks can be
topologically sorted so that any use of a variable follows its
definition in the list of blocks. This showed a slight flaw in my
definition of SSA form. It used to treat program counters up to
equality. However, PCs that point to a block header contain the location
that control came from (so that the Phi instructions can be executed),
but the SSA restrictions shouldn't pay attention to that, so now the
definition of SSA introduces a equivalence on PCs that ignores that
additional information.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D21066873
fbshipit-source-id: 735575a1f
Summary:
Introduce an explicit assumption that all of the instructions are ones
that are implemented in the translation so far, rather than just
cheating proof cases.
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D20891352
fbshipit-source-id: 37598bd8f
Josh Berdine
Scott Owens
Jules Villard