Summary: Model it similar to `NSArray.initWithArray` as copying from the given dictionary elements. Removes a FP as expected.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D24136868
fbshipit-source-id: ed31c3c8f
Summary:
This diff adds translation of `dictionaryWithObjects:forKeys:count:`. In the previous implementation it was
translated as if it was `dictionaryWtihObjectsAndKeys:`, but their function parameters are different.
In this diff, it translates an array literal `NSDictionary* a = @ [ @"firstName": @"Foo", @"lastName":@"Bar" ];` to
```
n$1=NSString.stringWithUTF8:(@"firstName")
n$2=NSNumber.stringWithUTF8:(@"Foo")
n$3=NSNumber.stringWithUTF8:(@"lastName")
n$4=NSNumber.stringWithUTF8:(@"Bar")
temp1[0]:objc_object*=n$1
temp1[1]:objc_object*=n$3
temp2[0]:objc_object*=n$2
temp2[1]:objc_object*=n$4
n$3=NSDictionary.dictionaryWithObjects:forKeys:count:(temp2:objc_object* const [2*8], temp1:objc_object*const [2*8], 2:int)
```
where `temp` is an additional local variable declared as array.
See,
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsdictionary/1574184-dictionarywithobjects?language=objchttps://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsdictionary/1574181-dictionarywithobjectsandkeys
{F316854542}
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23447042
fbshipit-source-id: 14b7c3f2b
Summary:
Two issues are fixed
1. For this diff, when the condition `curr_langauge_is Java` is removed in some part of the analysis, some c bufferoverrun tests are broken. This is fixed in this diff by inspecting if we are dealing with a `Size` alias referring to an `objc_internal_collection_array`.
2. Previously, when we are modifying mutable array in a loop, e.g. adding element to the array or removing element from the array, we are unable to give an estimable size of the array after exiting the loop. This is now fixed, and the corresponding FPs are resolved.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23342350
fbshipit-source-id: 200f5261c
Summary:
In the previous diffs, we implement enumerator in order to estimate the cost of for-each loop in ObjC, but when we have FP case when enumerator is used not in for-each loop. For example, the following code has top cost before the fix.
```
void nsarray_enumerator_linear_FP(NSArray* array) {
id obj;
NSInteger sum = 0;
NSEnumerator* enumerator = [array objectEnumerator];
while (obj = [enumerator nextObject]) {
sum += (NSInteger)obj;
}
}
```
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23294895
fbshipit-source-id: 50c7b359f
Summary:
Fix the FP when iterating through constant collection.
facebook
This fix is a hack for now.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D23241338
fbshipit-source-id: e2e0c05f8
Summary:
As title.
This diff is co-authored by SungKeun Cho and me.
facebook
This diff is co-authored by skcho and me.
Original comments from skcho
"For the record:
1. Rory and I tried to write models for ObjC iterator.
2. We could not use Java's iterator semantics: In Java's, `hasNext` returns the size of collection, rather than a boolean, and which is used as a control variable. On the other hand, in ObjC, it calls only `nextObject`, not calling `hasNext`, and the return value of which is being checked as `null`.
3. We added an artificial field `objc_iterator_offset` to keep the index of the iterator, and the models added in this diff are handling that integer value.
A problem is that `array.objc_iterator_offset` is not included in the control variables, since the condition of the loop is `nextObject() != null` that does not include the iterator offset. We need to make `array.objc_iterator_offset` as a control variable, by changing the part collecting control variables.
"
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D22944278
fbshipit-source-id: 7e71b79c1
Summary: Before, `NSCollection` are modelled like array, but this will have issue when we want to say add object to array. This diff changes `NSCollection`'s model to use Java's Collection model.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22840079
fbshipit-source-id: b944b743b
Summary: Implement `alloc` and implement initialisation method that uses the return value of `alloc`, i.e. `NSString.init`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22840080
fbshipit-source-id: 47a7523e3
Summary:
This diff translates for-in block in objc as a simple for-loop. For example,
`for (item_type item in items) { body }` is translated to
```
NSEnumerator *enumerator = [items objectEnumerator];
item_type item;
while (item = [enumerator nextObject]) { body }
```
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22841524
fbshipit-source-id: 296ee84df
Summary:
We check for supertypes in Java. Why not ObjC?
Would be good to get dulmarod's input here.
Reviewed By: roro47
Differential Revision: D22817126
fbshipit-source-id: 52c1c3f3c
Summary:
This diff adds translation of `arrayWithObjects:count:`. In the previous implementation it was
translated as if it was `arrayWithObjects:`, but their function parameters are different.
In this diff, it translates an array literal `NSArray* a = @ [ 2, 3 ];` to
```
n$1=NSNumber.numberWithInt:(2:int)
n$2=NSNumber.numberWithInt:(3:int)
temp[0]:objc_object*=n$1
temp[1]:objc_object*=n$2
n$3=NSArray.arrayWithObjects:count:(temp:objc_object* const [2*8],2:int)
a:NSArray*=n$3
```
where `temp` is an additional local variable declared as array.
See,
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray/1460145-arraywithobjectshttps://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray/1460096-arraywithobjects?language=objc
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22631305
fbshipit-source-id: 5be0a55d4
Summary: If a node is unreachable and the cost of the node is Top, we were giving Top cost :( Let's fix it.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22548269
fbshipit-source-id: d79743669
Summary:
As title
Model `NSString` as `JavaString`.
Since `NSArray` does not contain information about its type of element, we do not use associate string with collection as in Java and C++. In Java, String model is implemented using java collection, and for C++, string model is implemented using vector.
So instead, we use existing `JavaString` model.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22431949
fbshipit-source-id: 7cdde1ad7
Summary: This diff prevents printing line numbers of loop in the trace description, which helps to keep the same descriptions even when the line number of a function is changed in tests.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22375584
fbshipit-source-id: 676d1a7cc
Summary: Create test for the most common unmodeled function in inferbo that acts as control variable.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22331168
fbshipit-source-id: 1913682db
Summary: Add objc test for customized class and blocks. Mostly sanity test.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22043918
fbshipit-source-id: 917deeea7
Summary:
Add objc test for ```NSArray``` and ```NSMutableArray```.
```NSMutableArray``` is a subclass of ```NSArray```.
For documentation of ```NSArray```, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsarray?language=objc
For documentation of ```NSMutableArray```, https://developer.apple.com/documentation/foundation/nsmutablearray?language=objc
The underlying mechanism for ```NSMutableArray``` is quite complicated. It changes the underlying data structure during runtime, so it is possible to have say O(log n) complexity for accessing element in array. (See here https://opensource.apple.com/source/CF/CF-855.11/CFArray.h) However, this is unlikely to happen if the engineer does not abuse the usage of the class ```NSMutableArray``` according to at least two ios engineers. So here the complexity is set to match the normal expectation of the complexity.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22041277
fbshipit-source-id: c27f43167
Summary:
Add objc test case for ```NSInteger``` and ```NSString```.
The test cases are adapted from java test case: ```IntTest.java```, ```StringBuilder.java```, and ```StringTest.java```.
Inspection of the record will be done later.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D21994620
fbshipit-source-id: 0c1d7b34e
Summary:
Now that we have a way to write cost issues, let's not rely on some arbitrary threshold (and also get rid of `EXPENSIVE_EXECUTION_TIME` issues in tests).
One consequence of this is that we will loose the cost traces in tests since `costs-report.json` doesn't have any traces. Next diff fixes that.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D21837574
fbshipit-source-id: 86b4d028d
Summary: We don't use allocation costs in prod at the moment. There is no plan to do so in the near future. Let's not report them anymore and also save some space in `costs-report.json`.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D19766828
fbshipit-source-id: 06dffa61d
Summary: We want to keep big O notation as simple as possible in cost analysis reports (especially in diff time). Therefore, let's not show constants/min/max in big O notations even though the resulting asymptotic bound might be inaccurate. Developers can click on the trace and see the actual cost.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16731351
fbshipit-source-id: 2e16f7eca
Summary: In order to test changes to bigO notation, let's record them in test results.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D16763972
fbshipit-source-id: c1376909b
Summary:
- Add allocation costs to `costs-report.json` and enable diffing over allocation costs.
- Also, let's be more consistent and modular in naming our cost issues.
- introduce a generic issue type `X_TIME_COMPLEXITY_INCREASE` where `X` can be one of the cost kinds. If the function is on the cold start, issue can have the `COLD_START` suffix. Similarly for infinite/zero/expensive calls.
- Change `PERFORMANCE_VARIATION` -> `EXECUTION_TIME_COMPLEXITY_INCREASE`
- Add new issue type for `ALLOCATION_COMPLEXITY_INCREASE_COLD_START` which will be enabled by default
- Refactor cost issues to be more modular and succinct. This also makes addition of a new cost kind very easy by adding the kind into the `enabled_cost_kinds` list in `CostKind.ml`
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D15822681
fbshipit-source-id: cf89ece59
Summary:
Instead of emitting an ad-hoc builtin on variable declaration emit a new
metadata instruction. This allows us to remove the code matching on that
ad-hoc builtin that had to be inserted in several checkers.
Inferbo & pulse used that information meaningfully and had to undergo
some minor changes to cope with the new metada instruction.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D14833100
fbshipit-source-id: 9b3009d22
Ezgi Çiçek
Qianyi Shu
Sungkeun Cho
Jules Villard
David Lively
Dino Distefano