Summary: When we evaluate lambdas in pulse, we create a closure object with `fake` fields to store captured variables. However, during the function call we were not linking the captured values from the closure object. We address this missing part here.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23316750
fbshipit-source-id: 14751aa58
Summary:
Report errors found by running Topl on top of Pulse, when using
--topl-pulse. Topl tests now run on top of Pulse.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23030771
fbshipit-source-id: 8770c2902
Summary:
Two issues are fixed
1. For this diff, when the condition `curr_langauge_is Java` is removed in some part of the analysis, some c bufferoverrun tests are broken. This is fixed in this diff by inspecting if we are dealing with a `Size` alias referring to an `objc_internal_collection_array`.
2. Previously, when we are modifying mutable array in a loop, e.g. adding element to the array or removing element from the array, we are unable to give an estimable size of the array after exiting the loop. This is now fixed, and the corresponding FPs are resolved.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23342350
fbshipit-source-id: 200f5261c
Summary:
The generated code used to contain Prune statements that had boolean
connectives in their conditions. After this commit, all conditions
should have no boolean connective (LNot, LOr, LAnd) at top-level; that
is, prune conditions should be atomic.
The main motivation behind this change is that (a) frontends follow this
convention, and (b) Pulse assumes this convention.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23022273
fbshipit-source-id: 1313328e4
Summary:
In the previous diffs, we implement enumerator in order to estimate the cost of for-each loop in ObjC, but when we have FP case when enumerator is used not in for-each loop. For example, the following code has top cost before the fix.
```
void nsarray_enumerator_linear_FP(NSArray* array) {
id obj;
NSInteger sum = 0;
NSEnumerator* enumerator = [array objectEnumerator];
while (obj = [enumerator nextObject]) {
sum += (NSInteger)obj;
}
}
```
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23294895
fbshipit-source-id: 50c7b359f
Summary:
`delete` works exactly like `free` so merge both models together. Also
move the `free(0)` test to nullptr.cpp as it seems more appropriate.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D23241297
fbshipit-source-id: 20a32ac54
Summary:
Fix the FP when iterating through constant collection.
facebook
This fix is a hack for now.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D23241338
fbshipit-source-id: e2e0c05f8
Summary:
As title.
This diff is co-authored by SungKeun Cho and me.
facebook
This diff is co-authored by skcho and me.
Original comments from skcho
"For the record:
1. Rory and I tried to write models for ObjC iterator.
2. We could not use Java's iterator semantics: In Java's, `hasNext` returns the size of collection, rather than a boolean, and which is used as a control variable. On the other hand, in ObjC, it calls only `nextObject`, not calling `hasNext`, and the return value of which is being checked as `null`.
3. We added an artificial field `objc_iterator_offset` to keep the index of the iterator, and the models added in this diff are handling that integer value.
A problem is that `array.objc_iterator_offset` is not included in the control variables, since the condition of the loop is `nextObject() != null` that does not include the iterator offset. We need to make `array.objc_iterator_offset` as a control variable, by changing the part collecting control variables.
"
Reviewed By: ezgicicek, skcho
Differential Revision: D22944278
fbshipit-source-id: 7e71b79c1
Summary: In the frontend captured variables for blocks are added as formal parameters in procdesc at the beginning.
Reviewed By: dulmarod
Differential Revision: D23163619
fbshipit-source-id: 2bcbe9b9c
Summary:
When implementing iterator, we find out that because some semantics of inferbo is Java-specific, we cannot simply use Java's `Collection` model for `NSCollection`.
So this diff writing `NSCollection` model separately.
This diff also extracts the common parts of `NSCollection` and `Collection` into `AbstractCollection` to combine the duplicate the parts.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22975159
fbshipit-source-id: daed3f99f
Summary:
We already take into account inheritance if the method inherits a known
modelled initializer method (e.g. Activity.onCreate()).
But if the method is explicitly marked as Initializer, we require its
overrides to be also marked.
This diffs fixes the behavior and makes it consistent, now this is
enough to annotate only parent class.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23135177
fbshipit-source-id: a21ff4a0e
Summary: Before we were modelling `vector.end()` as returning a fresh pointer every time is was called. It is common to check if an iterator is not the `end()` iterator and proceed to dereference the iterator in that case. In such code pattern `vector.end()` is called twice and returns different fresh values which causes false positives. To fix this, we add a special internal field `__infer_model_backing_array_pointer_to_last_element` to a vector to denote its end. Now, every time we call `vector.end()` we return the value of this field. We introduce a new attribute `EndOfCollection` to mark `end` iterator as the existing `EndIterator` invalidation is not suitable when we need to read the same value multiple times.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23101185
fbshipit-source-id: fa8a33b58
Summary:
As preparation for splitting summaries into some of their components, and then iterating over only those when reporting (thus gaining performance) we need procnames in the table.
Also, this fixes the now-broken use case of `infer report` with spec files, by using `--procedures-filter` to restrict printing of summaries accordingly.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D23101853
fbshipit-source-id: 1ae878d8e
Summary: Extra info helps in debugging frontend issues and such.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D23101854
fbshipit-source-id: 27024675d
Summary:
This time it's personal.
Roll out pulse's own arithmetic domain to be fast and be able to add
precision as needed. Formulas are precise representations of the path
condition to allow for good inter-procedural precision. Reasoning on
these is somewhat ad-hoc (except for equalities, but even these aren't
quite properly saturated in general), so expect lots of holes.
Skipping dead code in the interest of readability as this (at least
temporarily) doesn't use pudge anymore. This may make a come-back as
pudge has/will have better precision: the proposed implementation of
`PulseFormula` is very cheap so can be used any time we could want to
prune paths (see following commits), but this comes at the price of some
precision. Calling into pudge at reporting time still sounds like a good
idea to reduce false positives due to infeasible paths.
#skipdeadcode
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22576004
fbshipit-source-id: c91793256
Summary:
Current handling of lambdas is quite rudimentary. Looking at test
results we can see that errors are all over the place: False Positives,
False Negatives and just plain wrong results.
These tests can be grouped in 2 sets:
1. Basic support which implies:
- understanding method signatures,
- providing comprehensible error messages.
2. Extended support with implies:
- understanding scoping of values captures in lambdas (needs proper aliasing analysis).
- understanding parametric nullability in generics (needs "some"
support for Generics in our Java frontend).
With follow-up patches I'll attempt to implement "Basic" support for
Lambdas. "Extended" support will be out of scope unless there's
significant demand.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D23058673
fbshipit-source-id: 621551cca
Summary:
Absence of kotlin-annotations led to warnings messages during tests compilation:
```
$ make
warning: unknown enum constant MigrationStatus.STRICT
reason: class file for kotlin.annotations.jvm.MigrationStatus not found
```
This doesn't affect test results but is annoying, hence the fix.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D23051769
fbshipit-source-id: e45fbe7be
Summary:
This diff adds a false positive test that is introduced imprecise loop
invariant detection.
In the example, `i` and a temp variable `$irvar = get_size(arr)` are
all included in the control variables, so the complexity becomes
quadratic. The problem is that `$irvar` is not addressed as a loop
invariant:
* `is.read` is analyzed as modifying a global
* all return variables, including `$irvar`, of unmodeled functions are invalidated
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D23051414
fbshipit-source-id: 011fd086b
Summary: To avoid dead store false positives we skip initialization of a variable that has an `unused` attribute. However, this causes uninitialized value false positives when the variable is later used in macros. To fix this, instead of skipping initialization we record the information about `unused` attribute in local variable data that we can later use for filtering out dead store issues.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22868050
fbshipit-source-id: 4a2d0e680
Summary:
We get duplicated variable declaration instruction for primitive type variable initialized using list initializer, e.g.
```
int* p{nullptr};
```
This happens because we add variable declaration instruction when we translate both `DeclStmt` and `InitListExpr`. To fix this, we do not add the duplicated variable declaration when we translate `InitListExpr`.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22844726
fbshipit-source-id: 422806924
Summary:
Synthetic/autogenerated methods/fields usually contain `$` in their names.
Reporting nullability violations on such code doesn't make much sense
since the violations are not actionable for users and likely need to be
resolved on another level.
This diff contributes:
1. Several test cases that involve synthetic code of different
complexity.
2. Code that handles some particular types of errors (but not all!).
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D22984578
fbshipit-source-id: d25806209
Summary:
`java_type` aka `JavaSplitName.t` is a pair of strings. It's used in a procname to store the return type. Replace that with `Typ.t`.
This is step one of deleting `JavaSplitName`. Step two will be to replace parameters with `Typ.t`.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D20323748
fbshipit-source-id: f0029c3ca
Summary: New, experimental for now, integration with buck on Java using the `#infer-java-capture` flavor.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D22187748
fbshipit-source-id: 62cdafe6b
Summary:
This diff removes a dead field `Struct.subs`, which was used in
heuristics finding methods from sub-classes.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22945346
fbshipit-source-id: 4b3bf0093
Summary: Before, `NSCollection` are modelled like array, but this will have issue when we want to say add object to array. This diff changes `NSCollection`'s model to use Java's Collection model.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22840079
fbshipit-source-id: b944b743b
Summary:
In Cost/Inferbo checkers, it tried to find a subclass with heuristics when a method of interface or
abstract class is called. While it makes preciser analysis results in general, sometimes introduced
tricky FPs since the behavior of the heuristics depends on targets. This diff revert the heuristics
to suppress the FPs.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D22924485
fbshipit-source-id: 9f151231f
Summary: Implement `alloc` and implement initialisation method that uses the return value of `alloc`, i.e. `NSString.init`.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22840080
fbshipit-source-id: 47a7523e3
Summary:
This diff translates for-in block in objc as a simple for-loop. For example,
`for (item_type item in items) { body }` is translated to
```
NSEnumerator *enumerator = [items objectEnumerator];
item_type item;
while (item = [enumerator nextObject]) { body }
```
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D22841524
fbshipit-source-id: 296ee84df
Summary:
There are two ways to suppress it.
1. Field level suppression annotation (was already tested). This will
apply to all constructors.
2. Constructor level annotation (this is what this test does). Sometimes
there are "fake" constructors that are not intended to be called in
prod, they might leave some fields not initialized.
Note that there are two ways to add a suppression; one has a known
problem that is documented here.
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D22864869
fbshipit-source-id: f95aaa26a
Summary:
When expressions use generics or typecasts, CFG contains intermediate `_fun_cast` nodes which break some nullsafe heuristics and lead to false positives.
This affects different types of checks (null-check on assignment expressions, `map.containsKey` checks in assignment expressions, regular typecasts, etc.
See added tests for examples.
Reviewed By: mityal
Differential Revision: D22815631
fbshipit-source-id: 80d444b1c
Summary:
We check for supertypes in Java. Why not ObjC?
Would be good to get dulmarod's input here.
Reviewed By: roro47
Differential Revision: D22817126
fbshipit-source-id: 52c1c3f3c
Summary:
The old --topl-only is now --topl-biabd-only, and there's also
--topl-pulse-only. This is WIP: the latter runs pulse, but it doesn't yet
extract Topl errors from pulse summaries. (The citv part of pulse path
conditions appears to have the necessary information.)
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22815250
fbshipit-source-id: a01792945
Summary:
This diff:
1. Adds general capability to model any field as nullable /
non-nullable.
2. Uses it for Boolean.TRUE and Boolean.FALSE
Reviewed By: artempyanykh
Differential Revision: D22794226
fbshipit-source-id: 95f586592
Summary: D17500386 had added the ability to give symbolic values on functions returning exceptions. However, this might cause FPs or cryptic complexity reports (especially with subclass heuristics). This diff aims to revert it back.
Reviewed By: skcho
Differential Revision: D22764266
fbshipit-source-id: 1615544d8
Summary: We model internal builtin `__new` function to return a non-null value. This fixes nullptr_dereference false positives where we explicitly check the result of a function call for nullptr when the function returns a newly created object.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22772217
fbshipit-source-id: 37d209697
Qianyi Shu
Ezgi Çiçek
Dulma Churchill
Daiva Naudziuniene
Radu Grigore
Jules Villard
Sungkeun Cho
Mitya Lyubarskiy
Nikos Gorogiannis
Artem Pianykh