Summary:
First step toward addressing bad traces that happen in examples like
```
void sourceMethod() {
Obj source = (Obj) InferTaint.inferSecretSource();
callSameSink(null, source); // index: 1
}
void callSameSink(Obj o1, Obj o2) {
callMySink1(o1); // flows via o1 ~= index 0, don't expand
callMySink2(o2); // flows via o2 ~= index 1, can expand
}
void callMySink1(Obj o) {
... // maybe interesting something happens here that doesn't happen in callMySink2
InferTaint.inferSensitiveSink(o); // flows via o ~= index 0, can expand
}
void callMySink2(Obj o) {
InferTaint.inferSensitiveSink(o); // flows via o ~= index 0, can expand
}
```
The issue is that when we recreate a trace to the sink starting from `sourceMethod`, we don't know which of the calls to `callMySink` to expand/include in the trace.
If we expand the call to `callMySink(o1)`, we'll get a bogus trace.
In this example that's not such a big deal, but imagine the case where the first call to `callMySink` is a different function that transitively calls the sink through some long and confusing path.
Remembering the index at which taint flows into each sink will let us choose which sinks are safe to expand.
This diff just adds indexes to the API; it's not actually propagating the index info or using it during expansion yet.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5170563
fbshipit-source-id: ba4b096
Summary: We were almost always using `~report_reachable:true`, and in the cases where we weren't it is fine to do so. In general, a sink could read any state from its parameters, so it makes sense to complain if anything reachable from them is tainted.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5169067
fbshipit-source-id: ea7d659
Summary:
Ran the build with -w,-32 , delete code, repeat, until a fixpoint of no more warnings is reach.
Unfortunately we cannot fatal on w32 because ppx_compare can generate dead code (eg `compare_t` and only `compare` is used).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D4945800
fbshipit-source-id: c95afb6
Summary: Being forced to separately define `pp_element`/`pp_key` is uneccessary and makes it more cumbersome to create a set/map from an existing module that already defines `pp`.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4517308
fbshipit-source-id: 9b17c9c
Summary: Other checkers are going to start using these, so they shouldn't live in the Quandary directory anymore
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D4124654
fbshipit-source-id: b1d5bdd
Summary: Other checkers are going to start using these, so they shouldn't live in the Quandary directory anymore
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D4117359
fbshipit-source-id: e3f151e
Sam Blackshear
Jules Villard
Andrzej Kotulski
Cristiano Calcagno
Josh Berdine