Summary:
Make distinct reports on strict mode violations.
For now, restrict to direct violations (UI threads calls transitively a violating method).
Will assess impact and enable indirect reports later (via locks).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10126780
fbshipit-source-id: 9c75930bc
Summary:
New clang in the plugin \o/
Changes that were needed:
- (minor) Some extra AST nodes
- defining a lambda and calling it in the same line (`[&x]() { x = 1; }()`) used to get translated as a call of the literal but now an intermediate variable gets created, which confuses uninit in one test. I added another test to showcase the limitation this is hitting: storing the lambda in a variable then calling it will not get caught by the checker.
The controller you requested could not be found.: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D10128626
fbshipit-source-id: 8ffd19f3c
Summary: Before this diff, the analysis would only lookup the attributes with the classname appearing in the instruction. However, it would fail to find those attributes for inherited and not overridden methods. With this diff, the attributes are now searched recursively in the super classes.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10007469
fbshipit-source-id: 77d721cba
Summary: This fixes some cases of false positives where the analysis will compare with the wrong overridden methods. This could later be improved with the possibility to do sub-typing comparison on the parameters.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D9985249
fbshipit-source-id: 7998d8619
Summary:
Keep `--analyzer` around for now for integrations that depend on it.
Also deprecate the `--infer-blacklist-path-regex`,
`--checkers-blacklist-path-regex`, etc. in favour of
`--report-blacklist-path-regex` which more accurately represents what these do
as of now.
Rely on the current subcommand instead of the analyzer where needed, as most of
the code already does.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9942809
fbshipit-source-id: 9380e6036
Summary:
Goal of the stack: deprecate the `--analyzer` option in favour of turning
individual features on and off. This option is a mess: some of the options are
now subcommands (compile, capture), others are aliases (infer and checkers),
and they can all be replicated using some straightforward combination of other
options.
This diff: stop using `--analyzer` in tests. It's mostly `checkers` everywhere,
which is already the default. `linters` becomes `--no-capture --linters-only`.
`infer` is supposed to be `checkers` already. `crashcontext` is
`--crashcontext-only`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9942689
fbshipit-source-id: 048281761
Summary: It is common on Android code to recycle the `View` object by nullifying them in the `onDestroy()` or `onDestroyView()` methods. In this case, the outer `Fragment` object structure is preserve while the inner `View` object are set to null for the garbage collect to release the memory. However, if the fields are only set to `null` in the `onDestroy*()` methods, those fields cannot be `null` during the active lifecycle of the `Fragment`, so it is not necessary to annotate those fields with `Nullable`.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D10024458
fbshipit-source-id: b05e538d9
Summary:
The method matcher is now used sufficiently it warrants refactoring out into its own module.
Also, kill dev-android-strict-mode and leave starvation-strict-mode as the stronger option.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D9990753
fbshipit-source-id: 626a70a19
Summary:
The model for `getcwd` assumes the first argument should be non-null when in fact a NULL pointer is legitimate and results in allocation:
> As an extension to the POSIX.1-2001 standard, glibc's getcwd() allocates the buffer dynamically using mal‐
> loc(3) if buf is NULL. In this case, the allocated buffer has the length size unless size is zero, when buf
> is allocated as big as necessary. The caller should free(3) the returned buffer.
I suggest this glibc extension be used for the getcwd model to reduce false positives.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/infer/pull/925
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9830450
Pulled By: jvillard
fbshipit-source-id: 95c4862b1
Summary: Always read the attributes from the attributes DB instead of trying to read the attributes from the analysis summaries
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9845085
fbshipit-source-id: aef48e6bf
Summary: No longer report inconsistencies with the annotations with subtyping when the super class is in an external packages since those warnings are not necessarily accurate or actionable.
Reviewed By: ezgicicek
Differential Revision: D9845098
fbshipit-source-id: 1f2bcd739
Summary: Sometimes it's very confusing to see why infer believes a method is running on the UI thread. Make a trace out of all the relevant info.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9781212
fbshipit-source-id: 6d018e400
Summary:
Turn off by default until mature enough.
Also rename the dev-strict-mode test dir to highlight the dev part.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9775571
fbshipit-source-id: c3a41bbdf
Summary:
First step in writing an analyzer that is meant to run only on Android core library implementation.
This will, when finished, compute the library entrypoints that may lead to a strict mode violation.
The normal analyzer will use those to statically flag strict mode violations in app code.
Strict Mode is an Android debug mode, where doing certain things (like disk read/write or network activity) on the UI thread will raise an exception. We want to statically catch these, as well as indirect versions (the UI thread takes a lock and another thread holding that lock calls a method that would be a strict mode violation).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D9634407
fbshipit-source-id: c30bcedb3
Nikos Gorogiannis
Jules Villard
Ezgi Çiçek
Jeremy Dubreil
Mehdi Bouaziz
Sungkeun Cho
Julian Sutherland
Martin Trojer
Dino Distefano
Thomas M. DuBuisson
Daiva Naudziuniene
Martino Luca