Summary:
This diff tries to achieve the followings: if we have the following C++ codes:
```
bool foo(int x, int y) {
return &x == &y;
}
```
We want the C++ frontend to emit Sil as if the input is written as
```
bool foo(int x, int y) {
if (&x == &y) return 1; else return 0;
}
```
This matches the behavior of our Java frontend.
The reason why we prefer an explicit branch is that it will force the backend to eagerly produce two different specs for `foo`. Without the explicit branch, for the above example the backend would produce one spec with `return = (&x == &y)` as the post condition, which is not ideal because (1) we don't want local variables to escape to the function summary, and (2) with the knowledge that no two local variables may alias each other, the backend could actually determines that `&x == &y` is always false, emitting a more precise postcondition `return = 0`. This is not possible if we do not eagerly resolve the comparison expression.
Reviewed By: akotulski
Differential Revision: D5260745
fbshipit-source-id: 6bbbf99
Summary:
:
There are throw wrapper functions like `std::__throw_bad_alloc()` defined in both libstdc++ (https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/functexcept.h) and libc++ (e.g. 907c1196a7/include/new (L145)). Folly actually exports some of them as well (diffusion/FBS/browse/master/fbcode/folly/portability/BitsFunctexcept.h). The function body of those wrappers merely throws the corresponding exception. My understanding is that the primary purpose of the wrappers is to throw the exception if everything goes well and to fall back to something reasonable when exception is disabled (e.g. when `-fno-exceptions` is passed to the compiler).
The problem is that infer doesn't really understand what those functions do, and I've seen some false positives get reported as a result of it. So to remove those FPs we need to either model them or handle them specially. Modeling those wrappers by either whitelisting them or overriding the include files turns out to be difficult, as those wrappers are only declared but not defined in the STL headers. Their implementations are not available to Infer so whitelisting them does nothing, and if I provide custom implementations in the headers then normal compilation process will be disrupted because the linker would complain about duplicated implementation.
What I did here is to replace functions whose name matches one of the throw wrapper's name with a `BuiltinDecls.exit`. I have to admit that this is a bit hacky: initially I was trying to do something more general: replacing functions with `noreturn` attribute with `BuitinDecls.exit`. That did not work because, CMIIW, the current frontend only exports function attributes for functions with actual bodies, not declaration-only functions. I'd love to be informed if there are better ways to handle those wrappers.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5266030
fbshipit-source-id: 4580227
Summary:
Read/write race errors should always show one trace for a read and one trace for a write.
We forget to pass the conflicting writes to the reporting function in one case, which prevented us from showing a well-formed trace.
Fixed it by making the `conflicts` parameter non-optional
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5209332
fbshipit-source-id: 05da01a
Summary:
For now, we just support clearing the taint on a return value.
Ideally, we would associate a kind with the sanitizer and only clear taint that matches that kind.
However, it's fairly complicated to make that work properly with footprint sources.
I have some ideas about how to do it with passthroughs instead, but let's just do the simple thing for now.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5141906
fbshipit-source-id: a5b8b5e
Summary:
This is a minimal change to (poorly) recognize and model std::mutex
lock and unlock methods, and to surface all thread safety issues for
C++ based on the computed summaries with no filtering.
This ignores much of the Java analysis, including everything about the
Threads domain. The S/N is comically low at this point.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5120485
fbshipit-source-id: 0f08caa
Summary: Gflags is a popular library used to create command line arguments. Flags shouldn't flow directly to `exec` etc.
Reviewed By: jvillard, mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5058393
fbshipit-source-id: ab062f8
Summary: String are very important for taint analysis, have to make sure that we have the right models/the right behaviors for unknown code.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D5054832
fbshipit-source-id: 7e7ee07
Summary:
This commit fixes a problem that the buffer overrun checker incorrectly
stops when a global variable (bottom) is involved in control flow.
In the new version, abstract memories return Top for unanalyzed abstract
variables.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5016447
fbshipit-source-id: 5132448
Summary:
The code was pretty fragile, it's less fragile now. We should probably just
delete that and start outputting proper class/package info directly in the
report.json instead of reverse-engineering them.
Fixes#640
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D4905973
fbshipit-source-id: 1590067
Summary:
An array has a static or dynamic length (number of elements), but it also has a
stride, determined by the type of the element: `sizeof(element_type)`. We don't
have a good `sizeof()` function available on SIL types, so record that stride
in the array type.
update-submodule: facebook-clang-plugins
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D4969697
fbshipit-source-id: 98e0670
Summary: In particular, the heuristics for propagating taint via unknown code needs to be aware of the frontend's trick of introducing dummy return variables.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5046345
fbshipit-source-id: da87665
Summary:
HIL had only been tested in Java, and it made some assumptions about what array expressions look like (the LHS is always resolvable to an access path) and assignments (the LHS is always an access path) that aren't true in C.
Fixed the code so we won't crash in this case.
Thanks to jeremydubreil for catching this.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5047649
fbshipit-source-id: e8484f4
Summary:
There are two pointer-related operations you can do in C++ but not Java that we need to support in taint analysis:
(1) `*formal_ptr = ...` when `formal_ptr` is a formal that's a pointer type. Java doesn't have raw pointers, so we didn't need to handle this case.
(2) Passing by reference, which Java also doesn't have (everything is pass-by-value).
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5041246
fbshipit-source-id: 4e8f962
Summary: Same as D5026082, but allowing specification in JSON rather than harcoded in Infer.
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5030042
fbshipit-source-id: 8a6cfee
Summary: A lot of C++ library functions look like this, so it's important to have.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5026082
fbshipit-source-id: 6f421b6
Summary: Making sure simple passthroughs like the identity function work in C++.
Reviewed By: mbouaziz
Differential Revision: D5024031
fbshipit-source-id: ce48ead
Summary:
Needed because this is how the Clang frontend translates returns of non-POD, non pointer values (I think)?
Will handle the more general case of pass by reference soon.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D5017653
fbshipit-source-id: 1fbcea5
Summary:
`[a, b] < [a, _]` and `[_, a] < [b, a]` are most probably false (it comes from size < size)
Mark definitely unsatisfied conditions as B1, others as B2+
Reviewed By: KihongHeo, jvillard
Differential Revision: D4962107
fbshipit-source-id: ba8f469
Summary:
The bufferoverrun checkers can now be run with:
infer -a checkers --bufferoverrun -- ...
Reviewed By: jeremydubreil
Differential Revision: D5010689
fbshipit-source-id: 2eaa396
Summary:
The Siof checkers can now be run with:
infer -a checkers --siof -- ...
and also runs by default using:
infer -a checkers -- ...
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5009731
fbshipit-source-id: e0e2168