Summary:
Works the same way as read/write races on fields, except that are more relaxed (er, unsound) in deciding whether two containers may alias.
This is needed to avoid reporting a ton of FP's; full explanation in comments.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D5493404
fbshipit-source-id: 0a5d8b1
Summary:
The way we represented container writes before was pretty hacky: just use a dummy field for the name of the method that performs the container write.
This diff introduces a new access kind for container writes that is much more structured.
This will make it easier to soundly handle aliasing between containers and support container reads in the near future.
Reviewed By: da319
Differential Revision: D5465747
fbshipit-source-id: e021ec2
Summary:
Read/write race errors should always show one trace for a read and one trace for a write.
We forget to pass the conflicting writes to the reporting function in one case, which prevented us from showing a well-formed trace.
Fixed it by making the `conflicts` parameter non-optional
Reviewed By: jberdine
Differential Revision: D5209332
fbshipit-source-id: 05da01a
Summary: Using Conjunction for thread join has known false negatives. Finer grained recording of threading information fixes this.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D5111161
fbshipit-source-id: aab483c
Summary:
Before we understood ownership, we needed this to avoid a mountain of Builder-related FP's.
Now that we have fairly sophisticated understanding of ownership, we can kill this hack.
Reviewed By: jaegs
Differential Revision: D4940238
fbshipit-source-id: 8d86e57
Summary: This should make the reports much easier to understand. We can generalize to reporting a stack trace for all of the writes in the future if we wish.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4845641
fbshipit-source-id: 589fdbc
Summary: If two public methods touch the same state and only one is marked `ThreadSafe`, it's reasonable to report unsafe accesses on both of them.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4785038
fbshipit-source-id: 5a80da4
Summary:
*Unless* the unprotected write runs on the main thread and the read doesn't.
Otherwise, we'll already report on the unprotected write, and we don't want to duplicate.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4798357
fbshipit-source-id: 5de06a0
Summary:
No new functionality here; mostly `FN_` tests documenting our current limitations.
Will start chipping away at the false negatives in follow-up diffs.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4780013
fbshipit-source-id: 7a0c821
Summary: Bringing the logic back to where it was before the big refactoring of the reporting logic.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4774541
fbshipit-source-id: afeaaf8
Summary:
Move all of the reporting on top of the aggregation functionality.
This lets us delete lots of code
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4772223
fbshipit-source-id: 47cc51a
Summary:
This was the one type of races we were not yet reporting (besides ones that use the wrong synchronization :)).
Wrote new utility function to aggregate all accesses by the memory they access.
This makes it easy to say which accesses we should report and what their conflicts are.
Eventually, we can simplify the reporting of other kinds of unsafe accesses using this structure.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4770542
fbshipit-source-id: 96d948e
Summary:
If I read off the main thread and write on the main we
could have a race. (Writes off main are already reported.)
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4746138
fbshipit-source-id: 8b6e9c5
Summary:
Before, `trace_of_pname` only grabbed unprotected writes from the summary, so the traces ending in an unprotected read were truncated.
We now look at reads too when appropriate.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4719740
fbshipit-source-id: 28f6e63
Summary: Run all the checkers one after each other, which allows the Infer AI framework to run several checkers together, including the possibility for them to collaborate.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4621838
fbshipit-source-id: e264d67
Summary:
When both an unprotected write and a read/write race emanate from the same line,
undoubtedly because of interprocedurality, strip the read/write report (for now).
Perhaps report the info in more succinct form later, but keep to one report/line.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4685102
fbshipit-source-id: 291cf20
Summary: Previously, we wouldn't report races where the write was under synchronization.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4658850
fbshipit-source-id: e9f4c41
Summary:
Stop multiple reports per line happening. These come about
because of interprocedural access to multiple fields. Present one trace,
and summary information about other accesses.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4636232
fbshipit-source-id: 9039fea
Summary: distinguish writes via method calls (e.g., add) from writes via assignment in the error messages
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4611748
fbshipit-source-id: 7594d3b
Summary: Report at most one read/write race or unprotected write per access path per method
Reviewed By: sblackshear, jvillard
Differential Revision: D4590815
fbshipit-source-id: 3c3a9d9
Summary: Reports on reads that have one or more conflicting writes. When you report, say which other methods race with it.
Reviewed By: sblackshear
Differential Revision: D4538793
fbshipit-source-id: 47ce700
Summary: Should stop us from reporting on benign races of fields that are caching resources.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4538037
fbshipit-source-id: 15236b4
Summary:
Previously, we would lose track of ownership in code like
```
Obj owned = new Obj();
Obj stillOwned = id(owned); // would lose ownership here
stillOwned.f = ... // would report false alarm here
```
This diff partially addresses the problem by adding a notion of "unconditional" (always owned) or "conditional" (owned if some formal at index i is owned) ownership.
Now we can handle simple examples like the one above.
I say "partially" because we still can't handle cases where there are different reasons for conditional ownership, such as
```
oneOrTwo(Obj o1, Obj o2) { if (*) return o1; else return o2; } // we won't understand that this maintains ownership if both formals are owned
Obj stillOwned = oneOrTwo(owned1, owned2);
stillOwned.f = ... // we'll report a false alarm here
```
This can be addressed in the future, but will require slightly more work
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4520069
fbshipit-source-id: 99c7418
Summary:
Constants are always "owned" in the sense that no one can mutate them.
In code like
```
Obj getX(boolean b) {
if (b) {
return null;
}
return new Obj();
}
```
, we need to understand this in order to infer that the returned value is owned.
This should fix a few FP's that I've seen.
Reviewed By: peterogithub
Differential Revision: D4485452
fbshipit-source-id: beae15b
Sam Blackshear
Kyriakos Nikolaos Gkorogiannis
Peter O'Hearn
Jeremy Dubreil