Summary:
Makes sure that topl summaries don't repeat. Previously this happened
when two posts led to the same summary when procedure-local variables
were killed. Such repeated summaries quickly lead to exponential
explosion. (For example, the added test -- `ManyLoops.java` -- didn't
finish in any reasonable time.)
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25209623
fbshipit-source-id: 04b1a3e12
Summary:
PulseTopl.large_step is now implemented
All active tests are migrated now to topl-in-pulse.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D25179556
fbshipit-source-id: dc1136bab
Summary:
Report errors found by running Topl on top of Pulse, when using
--topl-pulse. Topl tests now run on top of Pulse.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23030771
fbshipit-source-id: 8770c2902
Summary:
The generated code used to contain Prune statements that had boolean
connectives in their conditions. After this commit, all conditions
should have no boolean connective (LNot, LOr, LAnd) at top-level; that
is, prune conditions should be atomic.
The main motivation behind this change is that (a) frontends follow this
convention, and (b) Pulse assumes this convention.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D23022273
fbshipit-source-id: 1313328e4
Summary:
The old --topl-only is now --topl-biabd-only, and there's also
--topl-pulse-only. This is WIP: the latter runs pulse, but it doesn't yet
extract Topl errors from pulse summaries. (The citv part of pulse path
conditions appears to have the necessary information.)
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D22815250
fbshipit-source-id: a01792945
Summary:
This seems to make sense as it's a separate analysis (that depends on
biabduction). This introduces unpleasant `|| is_checker_enabled TOPL`
whenever we try to figure out if biabduction will run. I think this is a
more general problem that deserves a more general solution to express
the fact that checkers can depend on others, so that, eg,
`is_checker_enabled Purity` is true when we pass `--loop-hoisting`. Will
address in another diff.
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D21618460
fbshipit-source-id: 8b0c9a015
Summary:
Currenlty the cost issue is printed at the first node of a function, which is usually the first
statment of the function. This may give a wrong impression that the cost of the statement is
changed.
This diff re-locate where to print issues with heuristics. Going backward from the first node
lines, it looks up a line satisfying,
1. A line should start with <fname> or should include " <fname>".
2. The <fname> found in 1 should be followed by a space, '<', '(', or end of line.
Reviewed By: jvillard
Differential Revision: D20766876
fbshipit-source-id: b4fee3180
Summary:
This syntax
- is less confusing (according to several people who are not me);
objectively, there's less magic under the hood
- gives fine control over register number (because condition/action are separated)
- lets one compare values of different arguments of the same call
(e.g., one could have a transition that is taken only if two
arguments of a method call are equal)
Reviewed By: ngorogiannis
Differential Revision: D20005403
fbshipit-source-id: fad8f3b3d
Summary: add subdirectories so that we can run each java file against its own topl properties
Reviewed By: rgrig
Differential Revision: D19347302
fbshipit-source-id: 562830774
Radu Grigore
Jules Villard
Sungkeun Cho